Johnny Manziel sued for sexual harassment - plaintiff seeking $25 million

[Action]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>BREAKING: Johnny Manziel sued for sexual harassment; plaintiff seeks $25 million <a href="http://t.co/ryvNDzPiHf">http://t.co/ryvNDzPiHf</a></p>&mdash; Darren Heitner (@DarrenHeitner) <a href="https://twitter.com/DarrenHeitner/statuses/469831322785947648">May 23, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Following is NSFW (but hilarious)





This is the person suing

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Shaq&#39;s shoe... you know what THAT means? <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23ouch&amp;src=hash">#ouch</a> �� <a href="http://t.co/VAKVFD0HS4">pic.twitter.com/VAKVFD0HS4</a></p>&mdash; Samantha Schacher (@SamSchacher) <a href="https://twitter.com/SamSchacher/statuses/467382547341926402">May 16, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

-------

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Manziel suit was definitely filed. I just double-checked for the filing in the court system: <a href="http://t.co/91gJ75YMdf">pic.twitter.com/91gJ75YMdf</a></p>&mdash; Kristi Dosh (@SportsBizMiss) <a href="https://twitter.com/SportsBizMiss/statuses/469835261715562497">May 23, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Abuse of judicial system is no joke. If filed lawsuit against Johnny Manziel is frivolous, plaintiff should be punished accordingly.</p>&mdash; Darren Heitner (@DarrenHeitner) <a href="https://twitter.com/DarrenHeitner/statuses/469836220986834945">May 23, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Johnny Manziel lawsuit will get very ugly if someone fraudulently filed under Samantha Schacher's name.</p>&mdash; Darren Heitner (@DarrenHeitner) <a href="https://twitter.com/DarrenHeitner/statuses/469840348420644865">May 23, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

[Action]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>A few things to know on this Manziel lawsuit: Per Court clerk, the filer is a “frequent filer” &amp; Samantha Schacher is an alias. (1/2)</p>&mdash; Ian Rapoport (@RapSheet) <a href="https://twitter.com/RapSheet/statuses/469842844941684736">May 23, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>On the Manziel lawsuit: The address used by “Schacher” is actually 190 Marietta St. N.W. in Atlanta. Aka, CNN’s main address.</p>&mdash; Ian Rapoport (@RapSheet) <a href="https://twitter.com/RapSheet/statuses/469843193626767360">May 23, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Read the lawsuit for yourself: <a href="http://t.co/3jtmda8xkk">http://t.co/3jtmda8xkk</a>. The amount of misspellings (“Skyes” “Judereon Clowney”) are worth noting.</p>&mdash; Ian Rapoport (@RapSheet) <a href="https://twitter.com/RapSheet/statuses/469843955509510144">May 23, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

[Rabb]

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...ainst-manziel/

Hoax

[Action]

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...ainst-manziel/

Hoax

one way or another - if you read the filing it's obvious something is up - but the fact that it was actually FILED INTO THE US COURT SYSTEM....

[HILife]

lmao. This is got to be a hoax; that or one really stupid lawyer. I can't believe this actually got filled.

[Old Dude]

I think that if I were serious about suing someone for $25 million, I'd probably retain a lawyer.

The fact that this is a pro se filing is a strong indication that it's BS.

[goldengopher1976]

The purposeful misspelling of Jadeveon is the funniest part. Well, that and the whole "it's a small world" sequence. And the rest of it.

[BroncoBuff]

It's definitely not an authentic lawsuit.

Her "document" fails to comply with even the most basic Court Rules and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: It's single-spaced, not on pleading paper, not properly captioned with her contact info, there isn't even a caption to identify the document itself - clerk would likely reject the filing on that basis alone - and it purports to be 4 separate documents in 1 (complaint, declaration, motion for TRO, motion for preliminary injunction). Capper is that while the Court is identified by what appears to be an authentic stamp, the case number is written in hand - in the wrong place - and its letters and numbers are not legible.

[BroncoBuff]

I rest my case.

And hers.

[Rohirrim]

All sorts of pathos going on here. Where to start...?

[baja]

This is "Onion" type work and it's pretty darn funny.

Can't imagine anyone thinking it is real, not even for one second.

Of course it's a Hoax

[Action]

This is "Onion" type work and it's pretty darn funny.

Can't imagine anyone thinking it is real, not even for one second.

Of course it's a Hoax

It was filed...

[baja]

It was filed...

That doesn't mean it is not a total joke.

[Action]

That doesn't mean it is not a total joke.

Oh - obviously it is - I was just responding to about can't imagine someone thinking it's real.

[baja]

Oh - obviously it is - I was just responding to about can't imagine someone thinking it's real.

I think it is some whacked out publicity stunt