If Teddy is there at 31, do you take him?

[LikeABoss5820]

If they can deal Brock, i'd do it to make up for that pick.

[BroncoMan4ever]

I wouldn't take him at 63 let alone 31

[rolandftw]

Doubt they would. Personally, like his game a lot more then Brock's but it's hard to see Denver dealing him out so early and spending a first day pick on a player that isn't going to help the team at all this season.

[Bronc0guy]

I would without hesitation.

[LikeABoss5820]

Doubt they would. Personally, like his game a lot more then Brock's but it's hard to see Denver dealing him out so early and spending a first day pick on a player that isn't going to help the team at all this season.

I agree but i dont think many thought Manning would recover the way he did.

Unlikely to happen but if Elway likes him

[DBroncos4life]

He had one of the worst pro days in the history of ever.

[IndelibleScribe]

Nope, at 29 you start fielding calls. "Hey, if you need a QB the time is now."
I like Teddy but no QB in the first.

[BMORE]

That would lead to pandemonium Larry!

[maven]

If they can deal Brock, i'd do it to make up for that pick.

What does the team get for Brock? And to see Denver burn a 1st on Bridgewater b4 trading Brock?

burn........

[SoCalBronco]

Nope

[SonOfLe-loLang]

No. No. No

[broncosteven]

If they can deal Brock, i'd do it to make up for that pick.

No, his stock is falling. He had a bad pro-day and Oss looks like the better QB at this point especially since Oss has the investment of time in our system.

No way they would draft a struggling rook QB then dump a backup they have been grooming from this guy. Maybe one of the other stronger armed pocket passers who were way more accurate and hope Dysert could fill in for a few games if needed.

If Carr fell to us then maybe, I still wouldn't expect to get more than a 4th for Oss though if that.

The guy from Pitt had some nice pro day tape as did the guy from Eastern IL.

That said I would be pissed if we ended up with a QB in the 1st round. On ESPN NFL Live someone said that if you take a QB in the 1st round it puts pressure on your staff to start him NO MATTER WHO THE CURRENT QB IS. The pressure comes from both the fan base and the internal pressure to commit to a 1st round pick subliminally.

The point was that even if you wanted to develop a QB taken in the late 1st (think Tebow) there will be implied pressure for him to take on a starting role within a year or 2 and you cannot develop a guy like that even if he is a steal late in the 1st round and you have a solid starter in place.

I agree, maybe late 2nd but the highest I would take a development QB would be early 3rd round unless I was the GM of a desperate franchise that hasn't hit on a QB in the draft like kFc or Oakland.

[LikeABoss5820]

What does the team get for Brock? And to see Denver burn a 1st on Bridgewater b4 trading Brock?

burn........

2nd and 4th or 5th.

[Mat'hir Uth Gan]

Yes. He's the best QB in this draft on tape. Do not care about the Pro Day at all. He's hit every one of those passes accurately under pressure in big games for years.

[BroncosfanGuy]

If they can deal Brock, i'd do it to make up for that pick.

make up for what pick? Osweiler is likely a much better QB prospect as it stands anyway