Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Broncos sign C/G Graham Glasgow (4 years, 44 million - 26 gtd.)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Glasgow at C and Wilkinson at RG is certainly an option.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by IndelibleScribe View Post

      Uh uh, you don't play with the OL when you have your QB of the future.
      Munchak has a plan.

      it’s encouraging how the Fangio/staff have influence on decisions.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by R8R H8R View Post

        They may now offer McGovern a lo- ball contract, and if he refuses, they go with Morris, AND draft pick(s) at C/G.
        They said the team had an offer out to McGovern but pulled the offer once Glasgow signed.

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by IndelibleScribe View Post

          I would say trade up from #15 but I don't think it will be necessary unless the target is Ruggs or a OT.
          CEH just mentioned SF is a trade target. They need picks

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Drunken.Broncoholic2 View Post

            CEH just mentioned SF is a trade target. They need picks
            Would make a lot of sense if that's what they want to do. 15 to 13 and send SF the early 4th.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Drunken.Broncoholic2 View Post

              Munchak has a plan.

              it’s encouraging how the Fangio/staff have influence on decisions.
              I agree they have a plan. But Morris being the primary plan potentially is not a good one

              Originally posted by Drunken.Broncoholic2 View Post

              CEH just mentioned SF is a trade target. They need picks
              I agree San Fran is perfect for the trade up scenario, especially with them having #13 now.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by SonOfLe-loLang View Post

                Yeah, I can't disagree, but I'm on the small island that doesn't think Bolles is that bad. He improved last year, though obviously he had those penalties. Regardless, he's not a turnstile. he's average, if not a little better. You can win with that.
                I agree, I would think that they'll go for more developmental (3rd of lower) and see if they can develop him by the time to see if they can let Bolles walk.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Aztec Bronco View Post

                  Would make a lot of sense if that's what they want to do. 15 to 13 and send SF the early 4th.
                  But why? You have only moved ahead of TB.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Yeah as really Bolles would not call a bust but just not the right kind of fit.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by socalorado View Post

                      But why? You have only moved ahead of TB.
                      Other teams will by trying to move ahead of Denver possibly for a WR though. SF or TB are both options to trade up. I think that it will be hard to move into the top 12.

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Originally posted by socalorado View Post

                        But why? You have only moved ahead of TB.
                        Other teams potentially jumping + SF could take a WR or OT.

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by socalorado View Post

                          But why? You have only moved ahead of TB.
                          Depends. SF has needs in the same positions for Denver. But they need picks. I could see them trading back with someone or taking a target Denver has in their eyes.

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Originally posted by Drunken.Broncoholic2 View Post

                            Depends. SF has needs in the same positions for Denver. But they need picks. I could see them trading back with someone or taking a target Denver has in their eyes.
                            I guess. This draft is so deep at WR. I just don’t think trading up is a good idea unless it was for a Wirfs type player who fell to 13. I say trade back just a bit to say, 20 with JAX and get Jefferson.

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Don't trade up with the 49ers. Don't trade up for a WR.

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by Aztec Bronco View Post

                                Other teams potentially jumping + SF could take a WR or OT.
                                I just don’t like it unless it was for Wirfs.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X