Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

stoopid CHEF RUN crap , part 2

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Arkie View Post
    Back in Vince’s day you had to run to win.

    Now it’s more complicated. You can run or pass to get a lead, and then you run to keep the lead and work the clock. You need to pass to comeback and save precious minutes on the clock.
    How did that team get behind ?
    true Passing is more TIME EFFICIENT but is it more effective ?

    I love how all the haters can only focus on the FOURTH quarter , as if the previous 3 had nothing to do with the score before the teams came down to the last 15 minutes.

    Lets just gloss over that the 12 teams in the play-offs all have very good run games, when healthy, and they also have good run defenses.
    this is the cream of the crop.
    all 12 teams are here for a reason.

    and now the greater ability to run the ball will distinguish the good from GREAT.


    but running the ball does not mean anything until the fourth quarter, right.

    Comment


    • #17
      Brady threw 62 times in SB win.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by DENVERDUI55 View Post
        Brady threw 62 times in SB win.
        overtime game, greatest comeback in SB history, ONLY OT game in SB history.
        all you had to do was pick a cherry not throw the whole damn tree !
        why not divulge the winners of all 53 SBs how many of them ran to win to hold the trophy from the man who anointed the run game ?

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by DENVERDUI55 View Post
          Brady threw 62 times in SB win.
          and of course that was the same game the FACONS failed to RUN THE BALL in the second half,even with a commanding lead, and they let the pats back into the game.
          just like the fouts chargers, the falcons failed to run the ball !

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by CHEF LUIGI View Post

            and of course that was the same game the FACONS failed to RUN THE BALL in the second half,even with a commanding lead, and they let the pats back into the game.
            just like the fouts chargers, the falcons failed to run the ball !

            I'm sure NE having 25 rush attempts to Atlanta's 18 impacted the final score. Not the Pats going 7/14 on 3rd down and the Falcons just going 1/8 or NE running 93 plays to the Falcons 46. Much easier to pretend a lack of rushing attempts is why Atlanta failed to just score 3 more points in the 2nd half, and thereby icing the game.

            You and facts don't get along much, do you?

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by CHEF LUIGI View Post

              overtime game, greatest comeback in SB history, ONLY OT game in SB history.
              all you had to do was pick a cherry not throw the whole damn tree !
              why not divulge the winners of all 53 SBs how many of them ran to win to hold the trophy from the man who anointed the run game ?
              What was the pass run ratio in the Pat's victory over Seahawks?

              Comment


              • #22
                Chef is just confusing correlation with causation. Teams with leads that are trying to run the clock out run more. That’s all it is. If it was as simple as just calling run plays to win, then everyone would do it. I do believe a dominant running game paired with a good defense is a very good way to win in the NFL though. Running for 1-2 yards a pop in the other hand, not so much.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Next year let’s just run it every play and we will
                  go 19-0! WHY HASNT ANYONE TRIED THIS ITS SO SIMPLE

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by OABB View Post
                    Next year let’s just run it every play and we will
                    go 19-0! WHY HASNT ANYONE TRIED THIS ITS SO SIMPLE
                    Exactly why do QBs make big bucks?

                    Chef should have a max number of threads made.
                    Last edited by DENVERDUI55; 01-02-2020, 12:49 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Agamemnon View Post
                      Chef is just confusing correlation with causation. Teams with leads that are trying to run the clock out run more. That’s all it is. If it was as simple as just calling run plays to win, then everyone would do it. I do believe a dominant running game paired with a good defense is a very good way to win in the NFL though. Running for 1-2 yards a pop in the other hand, not so much.
                      This.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        we SHOULD HAVE let Peyton run the ball MORE, then we would have WON MORE superbowls - regardless of 40 TIMES!

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          It's way past time for everyone to ignore this guy and this thread and all the other threads he makes.

                          This is either brilliant trolling or willful, stubborn ignorance, but it doesn't deserve any more attention than the last time this happened.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Shananahan View Post
                            It's way past time for everyone to ignore this guy and this thread and all the other threads he makes.

                            This is either brilliant trolling or willful, stubborn ignorance, but it doesn't deserve any more attention than the last time this happened.
                            turn in your jake plummer fan club card.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              and they always resort to the absurd rather than allow themselves to consider the reality right before their eyes.
                              chef said run every down, why pay a QB, 1 or 2 yards, thats ok,just keep running.
                              Yes I said all of that and your hair smells like poop.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Agamemnon View Post
                                Chef is just confusing correlation with causation. Teams with leads that are trying to run the clock out run more. That’s all it is. If it was as simple as just calling run plays to win, then everyone would do it. I do believe a dominant running game paired with a good defense is a very good way to win in the NFL though. Running for 1-2 yards a pop in the other hand, not so much.
                                Except he thinks teams don’t get leads by passing more than rushing attempts. which is why he’s going to update every first half of games.

                                What he’s confusing is his peyote with his oregano.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X