Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mock wrap-up - January

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Mock wrap-up - January

    I did a tabulation of Denver's #10 pick from a data base of 60 mocks in January, most of them done after the Senior Bowl. Drew Lock was the runaway leader with 17 mocks slotting him for Denver at #10. Things will get more interesting post-combine in early March, then free agency starting March 13.

    Mocks at pick #10

    17-Drew Lock, QB, Missouri

    7 - Daniel Jones, QB, Duke

    5 - Devin White, LB, LSU

    4 - Greedy Williams, CB, LSU (one trade to #9)

    3 - Byron Murray, CB, Washington

    3 - Will Grier, QB, West Virginia

    2 - Dwayne Haskins, QB, Ohio St.

    2 - Christian Wilkins, DT, Clemson

    2 - Rashan Gary, DL, Michigan

    2 - DeAndre Baker, CB, Georgia

    2 - Jawaan Taylor, OT, Florida (one trade to #9)

    2 - Kyler Murray, QB, Oklahoma

    2 - Cody Ford, OT, Oklahoma

    2 - Ed Oliver, DL, Houston

    2 - Jonah Williams, OT, Alabama

    1 - Jeffrey Simmons, DT, Miss. St.

    1 - T. J. Hocken, TE, Iowa

    1 - N'Keal Harry, WR, Arizona St.

  • #2
    I like toast.

    Comment


    • #3
      A tackle? Really?

      Comment


      • #4
        Water has the uncanny property of having low viscosity and it feels wet.

        Read that in a book.

        Comment


        • #5
          what liquid has less viscosity than water?

          Comment


          • #6
            It appears that a large amount think we take a QB.

            The message I get off of that is... Even the peanut gallery knows we need a QB.

            (Also... I'd be happy with any of the above listed QBs, we got a sht show circus QB room and we really need at least a long term #2. Either guy would set a higher ceiling than currently exists for at least one seat in the QB room. As long as we fill #2 & #1 with viable young guys over the next two years, then the QB room ceiling can grow out of being stuck paying gobs to Orton types.)
            Last edited by Old Coyote; 02-01-2019, 08:18 PM.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Action View Post
              A tackle? Really?
              OT would be the most cost effective at #10 if the Broncos sign Foles and a lockdown LCB in FA. Everything depends on how Broncos choose to attack the first day of FA.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by pricejj View Post
                OT would be the most cost effective at #10 if the Broncos sign Foles and a lockdown LCB in FA. Everything depends on how Broncos choose to attack the first day of FA.
                I don't think there's anything cost effective about signing Foles and a "lock down" corner. Pretty piss poor move, financially, actually.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by pricejj View Post
                  OT would be the most cost effective at #10 if the Broncos sign Foles and a lockdown LCB in FA. Everything depends on how Broncos choose to attack the first day of FA.
                  Odd post
                  I want playmaker at #10 plus #10 cost the same not matter the position.
                  Not sure teams win super bowls because the tenth player in the draft is “cost effective “ whatever that mean in terms of the 10th pick

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by CHEF LUIGI View Post
                    what liquid has less viscosity than water?
                    pee

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Papa-pwn View Post
                      I don't think there's anything cost effective about signing Foles and a "lock down" corner. Pretty piss poor move, financially, actually.
                      I think he was referring to drafting a OT as being the cost effective part if those other things happen. I don't think he's saying that scenario would be the most cost effective.

                      I could be wrong though.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I'm hoping for a QB, if the FO truly likes any of them.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X