Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The rookie QB's

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Boltjolt
    replied
    Originally posted by RonStoppable View Post
    Why you dont look in the others threads?
    He also played vs the bears(if i remeber corectly) 1st 2 drives. He is a 1st round talent and was rated higher then mahomes at espn science lab.
    AND did you see him? He got something.
    Yet he was a 7th round pick. If he were regarded that highly he would of went higher. This is a QB desperate league. Someone at ESPN science labs needs a drug test.
    Keep dreaming about that. But, as a division rival, I say start him!

    Leave a comment:


  • RonStoppable
    replied
    Originally posted by Boltjolt View Post
    Chad Kelly? Lol, what, did he have a good preseason game against the 2nd and 3rd string or something? He is more talented than Keenum? Lol, based on what?
    Seriously, you got to be kidding.
    Why you dont look in the others threads?
    He also played vs the bears(if i remeber corectly) 1st 2 drives. He is a 1st round talent and was rated higher then mahomes at espn science lab.
    AND did you see him? He got something.

    Leave a comment:


  • MamaMia
    replied
    Originally posted by Mile High Salute View Post
    Just watch - this is gonna be Rosen's coming out party. He took it personally that the Broncos passed on him and has long circled this game on his calendar. Major revenge potential in this game vs. a defense that is either unequipped or uninterested in stopping the bleeding (maybe both).
    that.. or he'll throw a few picks and shrug like he's annoyed to be there

    Leave a comment:


  • Boltjolt
    replied
    Originally posted by GaryPupiak View Post
    Chad Kelly's talent is so far superior to Keenum it defies all common logic why he is not playing.

    Not only is his talent superior, he is exciting to watch. Keenum = zzzzzzzzz.
    Chad Kelly? Lol, what, did he have a good preseason game against the 2nd and 3rd string or something? He is more talented than Keenum? Lol, based on what?
    Seriously, you got to be kidding.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Coyote
    replied
    Originally posted by GaryPupiak View Post
    Chad Kelly's talent is so far superior to Keenum it defies all common logic why he is not playing.

    Not only is his talent superior, he is exciting to watch. Keenum = zzzzzzzzz.
    It's radio. It makes sense because it's Radio.

    He also put von Miller in coverage and Roby as an outside CB. He picks Garcia over McGovern. He sticks with Marshall over Jewel. He doesn't move Boles or give him help when he gets smoked. He calls for 3 back to back passing plays when our running game is killing it.
    He doesn't know how to use a radio.

    It makes perfect sense....

    Leave a comment:


  • Boltjolt
    replied
    Originally posted by Pony Boy View Post
    What QB will be worth taking with our top 5 pick in 2019?
    This QB class isn't going to be that great. Certainly not like this year's class. It will be better in 2020.

    Leave a comment:


  • Powderaddict
    replied
    I just learned that Phillip Rivers is athletic enough to get out of the pocket.

    Leave a comment:


  • TonyR
    replied
    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Ready to have your mind blown? Check out the best &amp; worst-rated QBs OUTSIDE THE POCKET this season.<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/FightForEachOther?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw ">#FightForEachOther</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/InBrotherhood?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#I nBrotherhood</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/RavensFlock?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Rav ensFlock</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/FlyEaglesFly?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Fl yEaglesFly</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Seahawks?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Seahaw ks</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Skol?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Skol</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/LARams?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#LARams</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/GoNiners?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#GoNine rs</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Browns?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Browns</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/GoBills?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#GoBills </a> <a href="https://t.co/WPSl3l8wBu">pic.twitter.com/WPSl3l8wBu</a></p>&mdash; NFL Matchup on ESPN (@NFLMatchup) <a href="https://twitter.com/NFLMatchup/status/1052203849027637251?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 16, 2018</a></blockquote>
    <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

    Get Mayfield and Allen out of the pocket and they self destruct.

    Leave a comment:


  • TonyR
    replied
    Originally posted by Mile High Salute View Post
    Yep - I agree. Just wish they would split it into garbage time stats vs. a prevent defense and real stats when the game is still on the line. It would make it a lot easier to justify Keemian's benching with what all of us can see using the eye test.
    But Keenum is actually a good example. He's 29th in QB rating, and 29th in QBR. So even though he may not be perfectly ranked, he's ranked low. And a low ranking in both stats is a pretty good indicator that he sucks. And that your eyes don't deceive you.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mile High Salute
    replied
    Originally posted by TonyR View Post
    True. But you can make generalizations from them. For example, higher rated QB's are generally better than lower rated QB's. And this becomes more true as the sample size grows.
    Yep - I agree. Just wish they would split it into garbage time stats vs. a prevent defense and real stats when the game is still on the line. It would make it a lot easier to justify Keemian's benching with what all of us can see using the eye test.

    Leave a comment:


  • TonyR
    replied
    Originally posted by Mile High Salute View Post
    And yet Keemian's ratings were 95.0 and 91.7 the last two games, so he must be better than Darnold. Ratings don't tell the whole story.
    True. But you can make generalizations from them. For example, higher rated QB's are generally better than lower rated QB's. And this becomes more true as the sample size grows.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mile High Salute
    replied
    Originally posted by TonyR View Post
    Ok, you want his QB ratings instead?

    9/20 vs. Jets: 100.1
    9/30 vs. Raiders: 70.7
    10/7 vs. Ravens: 81.7
    10/14 vs. Chargers: 52.6
    And yet Keemian's ratings were 95.0 and 91.7 the last two games, so he must be better than Darnold. Ratings don't tell the whole story.

    Leave a comment:


  • TonyR
    replied
    Originally posted by Agamemnon View Post
    QBR? lulz
    Ok, you want his QB ratings instead?

    9/20 vs. Jets: 100.1
    9/30 vs. Raiders: 70.7
    10/7 vs. Ravens: 81.7
    10/14 vs. Chargers: 52.6

    Leave a comment:


  • Agamemnon
    replied
    Originally posted by TonyR View Post
    Mayfield's QBR has declined every week since he took over for Tyrod Taylor in Week 3. In that relief appearance, he had a week-best 96.1 QBR. But he followed it up with a 53.1, a 41.0 and a 14.5 in Week 6 against the Chargers.

    http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/2...2018-total-qbr
    QBR? lulz

    Leave a comment:


  • DENVERDUI55
    replied
    Originally posted by TonyR View Post
    Mayfield's QBR has declined every week since he took over for Tyrod Taylor in Week 3. In that relief appearance, he had a week-best 96.1 QBR. But he followed it up with a 53.1, a 41.0 and a 14.5 in Week 6 against the Chargers.

    http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/2...2018-total-qbr
    Cleveland is winning with a talented Defense and a running game. Mayfield has been pretty mediocre.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X