Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

FOX IS A ****ING IDIOT!!!!!!!!!!!!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The1percentKid
    replied
    Originally posted by TonyR View Post
    So even when Fox is right he still ****s it up.


    That's a joke btw

    Leave a comment:


  • TonyR
    replied
    Originally posted by Drunken.Broncoholic2 View Post
    I know going for 2 at that time would've made it a 2 score game but not kicking that extra point resulted in it being 39-30 instead of 39-31? At the end they would've just needed a TD on that last drive instead of having to kick a FG and onside for another TD

    Has this been brought up ? Don't see many talking about it. You kick the extra point there knowing this offense can score
    Here's Barnwell's take on it:

    Second-guessers step off! I wasn't enthralled with Fox's performance on Sunday night, notably how conservative he was on fourth down during the first 40 minutes of the game, but he got the most notable two-point conversion choice of the game right.

    People saying that Fox didn't need to go for two on this possession ignore how bad the Denver offense had been up to that point. By making this call, the Broncos were creating the possibility of turning a two-touchdown game into a one-touchdown, oneā€“field goal game (with a successful two-point conversion). They would also still be within two touchdowns (without any two-pointers) if they converted and the Colts later added a field goal (as they would actually do). Denver didn't get the two-pointer when Peyton Manning uncharacteristically put too much zip on a pass to a wide-open Demaryius Thomas, who dropped the throw.
    http://www.grantland.com/blog/the-tr...oaching-week-7

    Leave a comment:


  • SonOfLe-loLang
    replied
    Originally posted by maven View Post
    Well they had a delay of game called after that play. I guess the guys upstairs thought it wasn't worth challenging so he didn't throw the flag.
    It wouldnt have come back, but had it been called a TD on the field, it wouldnt have been reversed either. One of those.

    Leave a comment:


  • The1percentKid
    replied
    I know going for 2 at that time would've made it a 2 score game but not kicking that extra point resulted in it being 39-30 instead of 39-31? At the end they would've just needed a TD on that last drive instead of having to kick a FG and onside for another TD

    Has this been brought up ? Don't see many talking about it. You kick the extra point there knowing this offense can score

    Leave a comment:


  • maven
    replied
    Well they had a delay of game called after that play. I guess the guys upstairs thought it wasn't worth challenging so he didn't throw the flag.

    Leave a comment:


  • phibacka31
    replied
    Originally posted by Drunken.Broncoholic2 View Post
    Isn't the pylon considered the goalline? It's a catch when caught and a football move is made. Trying to hit the pylon with the ball is a football move IMO. Hitting a pylon with the ball can jar it loose. If he doesn't hit the pylon and goes out of bounds I can see it being incomplete. But hitting the pylon is like crossing the goal line. The pylon is considered the goal line right?
    THIS!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • The1percentKid
    replied
    Isn't the pylon considered the goalline? It's a catch when caught and a football move is made. Trying to hit the pylon with the ball is a football move IMO. Hitting a pylon with the ball can jar it loose. If he doesn't hit the pylon and goes out of bounds I can see it being incomplete. But hitting the pylon is like crossing the goal line. The pylon is considered the goal line right?

    Leave a comment:


  • DENVERDUI55
    replied
    Originally posted by Kaylore View Post
    I was pissed at him for not going for it early in the game on fourth and like half an inch.
    I agree. The first drive of the game set the tone. I guess he did and said Denver is playing conservative.

    Leave a comment:


  • horsepower
    replied
    Originally posted by baja View Post
    I wanted him to challenge what should have been Decker's touchdown

    yes good point, decker caught the ball took a step(football move) dived and then broke the plane the ball came out after he landed

    Leave a comment:


  • Rohirrim
    replied
    Originally posted by baja View Post
    I'd say you are the one being played. Greatest tax hoax since the beginning of time, global warming. Want to worry about something worry about 17 Trillion debt. That will bite you in the ass long before melting glaciers.
    Wow! Senator Inhofe posts on the Mane. Cool.

    Leave a comment:


  • broncobum6162
    replied
    Originally posted by Agamemnon View Post
    It's hard to win in the playoffs much less win a Super Bowl when you constantly play not to lose rather than to win. Just ask Marty Schottenheimer.
    Rep

    Leave a comment:


  • DenverBrit
    replied
    Originally posted by rolandftw View Post
    I don't get this thread. This loss was mainly on Denver's turnovers and bad offensive line protection
    Exactly!

    The play calling comes from the same guys we were happy with before last night's loss.

    They played a very good team at home, one that had already beaten Seattle and SF. Player miscues lost the game not coaching.

    Can't turn the ball over 4 times and expect to win.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zealot
    replied
    Originally posted by Action View Post
    Your rulebook doesn't regard goal line.

    I showed a play exactly where it was ruled a touchdown after it was reviewed in the same scenario.
    If you were to actually read it instead of thinking you know it all, it says in item 1 "whether in the field of play or the end zone."

    The other play you are referencing was determined to be that he secured the ball and turned up field in before going to the ground. The dive was the next move meaning the play was over the instant he crossed the goal line.
    Last edited by Zealot; 10-21-2013, 09:44 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • L.A. BRONCOS FAN
    replied
    Yeah, Fox > MickeyD - FWIW.

    Leave a comment:


  • FireFly
    replied
    Originally posted by R8R H8R View Post
    I'd rather have McD, he was aggressive. He couldn't coach worth a ****, but hell, he sure would take a lot of chances on game day and in the draft!

    I wanted Fox to go for it on 4th and an inch too, but face it, if we don't make it, a real possibility the way we played tonight, you same guys will be the first ones to call for his head.
    McD was a terrible personnel guy. Horrible 6 days out of 7 and everyday during the offseason, but on game day Fox is just as bad sometimes worse and definitely gutless.

    Fox plays not to lose rather than playing to win

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X