Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Guns don't kill people

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • jhat01
    replied
    Originally posted by L.A. BRONCOS FAN View Post
    If it were "obvious," then we wouldn't be having this discussion, would we?
    I haven't heard anyone argue for gun rights of 9 year old children, maybe Rush has since you mentioned him but I don't listen to him so I don't know. What I'm getting at is what does this have to do with the overall gun debate? Did you post the video to highlight the stupidity of the child's parents, or the lack of proper instruction? Or are you blaming the Uzi for killing the guy?

    Leave a comment:


  • L.A. BRONCOS FAN
    replied
    Originally posted by jhat01 View Post
    That's obvious. There's no reason for a noodle armed child to be given an automatic weapon and a full magazine. That's not ground breaking or cutting edge thought, so what gives with the trolling of the "pro gun" folks?
    If it were "obvious," then we wouldn't be having this discussion, would we?

    Leave a comment:


  • jhat01
    replied
    Originally posted by L.A. BRONCOS FAN View Post
    Um, that any scenario where a nine year-old girl can get her hands on an Uzi is a bad one?
    That's obvious. There's no reason for a noodle armed child to be given an automatic weapon and a full magazine. That's not ground breaking or cutting edge thought, so what gives with the trolling of the "pro gun" folks?

    Leave a comment:


  • L.A. BRONCOS FAN
    replied
    Originally posted by jhat01 View Post
    What's the revelation here?
    Um, that any scenario where a nine year-old girl can get her hands on an Uzi is a bad one?

    Leave a comment:


  • cutthemdown
    replied
    All the guys I shoot with are democrats except for a couple of us. They are big into guns and shooting. I don't think owning guns is a slam dunk repub vs dem issue. That's why the super liberals like LABF never win on that issue. Too many democrats won't go along with more gun control.

    Pointing to accidents with guns just doesn't matter. There are lot's of activities Americans do that have accidents where people hurt themselves or other people.

    Leave a comment:


  • jhat01
    replied
    Originally posted by L.A. BRONCOS FAN View Post
    It should be interesting to see how Rush's Kids spin this one.
    What is there to spin? Dumb parents, dumb instructor, bullets to the face. What's the revelation here?

    Leave a comment:


  • L.A. BRONCOS FAN
    replied
    Originally posted by TonyR View Post
    >Video<
    It should be interesting to see how Rush's Kids spin this one.

    Leave a comment:


  • L.A. BRONCOS FAN
    replied
    Originally posted by Rohirrim View Post
    Using that logic, you shouldn't make laws against burglary either. Why? Because burglars will ignore them.
    That's really right-wing ideology in a nutshell, isn't it?

    If man-made institutions like the law, government, etc., are imperfect, then we might as well dispense with those institutions altogether.

    Leave a comment:


  • TonyR
    replied
    <iframe width="854" height="510" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/cfMzK7QwfrU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

    Leave a comment:


  • cutthemdown
    replied
    Originally posted by Rohirrim View Post
    Using that logic, you shouldn't make laws against burglary either. Why? Because burglars will ignore them.
    No because there is no lawful burglary. There is lawful gun ownership.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rohirrim
    replied
    Originally posted by nyuk nyuk View Post
    Instead of making laws on criminals, they're making them on law-abiding gun owners.
    Using that logic, you shouldn't make laws against burglary either. Why? Because burglars will ignore them.

    Leave a comment:


  • nyuk nyuk
    replied
    Originally posted by barryr View Post
    Yes I'm sure criminals would start following laws if we would only start creating more. More like for them to ignore is more like it. Idiots.
    Instead of making laws on criminals, they're making them on law-abiding gun owners.

    Leave a comment:


  • W*GS
    replied
    Originally posted by barryr View Post
    Yes I'm sure criminals would start following laws if we would only start creating more. More like for them to ignore is more like it. Idiots.
    All laws are broken, therefore, we shouldn't have any laws.

    Feel free to go **** that sheep you've had your eye on.

    Leave a comment:


  • barryr
    replied
    Yes I'm sure criminals would start following laws if we would only start creating more. More like for them to ignore is more like it. Idiots.

    Leave a comment:


  • nyuk nyuk
    replied
    Originally posted by Rigs11 View Post
    Wow. I'll break it down for you. You can't drink and drive,and you shouldn't be allowed to drink and carry a gun. Understand now?
    What makes you think people are allowed to now?



    If you abuse alcohol you don't even qualify for a conceal carry permit in Colorado. It is also ALREADY illegal to possess a firearm while under the influence.

    Colorado Revised Statutes:

    18-12-106 Prohibited Use Of Weapons

    He has in his possession a firearm while he is under the influence of intoxicating liquor or of a controlled substance, as defined in section 12-22-303(7), C.R.S. Possession of a permit issued under section 18-12-105.1 is no defense to a violation of this subsection (1).

    Federal law dictates that people who use OR are addicted to controlled substances including marijuana are forbidden from shipping, transporting, receiving or possessing firearms or ammunition.

    THEY ARE NOT ALLOWED TO OWN GUNS.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X