Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Stephen Hawking: "I was wrong about black holes."

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Stephen Hawking: "I was wrong about black holes."

    Hawking finally saw the light. He now says black holes do not exist. It's refreshing to hear a scientist admit a mistake like this.
    MHG

    http://starburstfound.org/hawking-fi...k-holes-exist/

  • #2
    When you gonna admit error, gaffe?

    You've got about a billion.

    Comment


    • #3
      I've acknowledged errors many times on this board. Screw you, jerk.

      Comment


      • #4
        Check out this 2011 paper by Dr Paul LaViolette, who found evidence the Pleistocene extinction event in North America was caused by a solar storm.

        This extinction has baffled science for many years.
        MHG

        http://digitalcommons.arizona.edu/ob...6-40c42f0ced1b

        Comment


        • #5
          Hawking finally saw the light. He now says black holes do not exist. It's refreshing to hear a scientist admit a mistake like this.
          MHG
          I've acknowledged errors many times on this board.

          To be clear, Hawking was not claiming that black holes don’t exist. Astronomers have been observing black holes for decades, said Joseph Polchinski, theoretical physicist at the Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics at the University of California, Santa Barbara.

          What Hawking did was propose an explanation to one of the most puzzling problems in theoretical physics. How can black holes exist when they seem to break two fundamental laws of physics — Einstein’s laws of relativity and quantum mechanics? We’ll explain.

          http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/...t-black-holes/

          Comment


          • #6
            total b.s.

            Typical lone dolt post.

            "Observing black holes?" Exactly what does that mean?

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by mhgaffney View Post
              total b.s.

              Typical lone dolt post.

              "Observing black holes?" Exactly what does that mean?
              Scientists can't directly observe black holes with telescopes that detect x-rays, light, or other forms of electromagnetic radiation. We can, however, infer the presence of black holes and study them by detecting their effect on other matter nearby.
              http://science.nasa.gov/astrophysics...s/black-holes/

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by mhgaffney View Post
                I've acknowledged errors many times on this board. Screw you, jerk.
                So, you admit that the damage caused by the plane impacts and the resulting fires brought down WTC 1 and WTC on 9/11?

                That Venus is a planet?

                That's two big errors you still cling to.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by mhgaffney View Post
                  I've acknowledged errors many times on this board. Screw you, jerk.
                  Errors?? You flat out lie and have yet to admit you do so.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by DenverBrit View Post
                    Errors?? You flat out lie and have yet to admit you do so.
                    An error implies that you thought something was true that was later shown to be false.

                    A lie is when you'll say any idiotic and patently false thing you can to sell your book.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by W*GS View Post
                      So, you admit that the damage caused by the plane impacts and the resulting fires brought down WTC 1 and WTC on 9/11?

                      That Venus is a planet?

                      That's two big errors you still cling to.
                      Wags pretends to be a scientist, but refuses even to read the seismic analysis I posted recently by Dr. Andre Rousseau (a geophysicist) showing that the seismic evidence from 9/11 supports the use of explosives to bring down the WTC.

                      MHG

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        You would do well to study Dr Paul LaViolette's work. He's one of the smartest people on the planet. I posted a link to his site.
                        MHG

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by mhgaffney View Post
                          Wags pretends to be a scientist, but refuses even to read the seismic analysis I posted recently by Dr. Andre Rousseau (a geophysicist) showing that the seismic evidence from 9/11 supports the use of explosives to bring down the WTC.
                          I already posted a debunking of his crap.

                          You ignored it.

                          You're simply a ****ing moron shyte-fer-brains troll.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            W*gs, admit you're not a scientist.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by mhgaffney View Post
                              W*gs, admit you're not a scientist.
                              I've never said I was, dickhead.

                              But I know a hell of a lot more about genuine science than you do - almost everything you post is utter bullshart.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X