Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

seismic data points to use of explosives on 9/11

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    I never stated they were silent.

    I never said the noise was wind. That's your overactive imagination.

    Comment


    • #17
      When buildings fall down -- even large buildings like the WTC -- they do not generate seismic signals at a distance. The ground waves only travel a few miles.

      The signals picked up by Lamont-Doherty had traveled a much greater distance. This is indicative of explosives.

      There are other problems also with the official story -- covered pretty well I thought by Dr Rousseau.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by mhgaffney View Post
        I never stated they were silent.

        I never said the noise was wind. That's your overactive imagination.
        Um, yes you did. Can anybody else chime in on this?

        Comment


        • #19
          Dolt,

          You are living up to your name. If you have a substantive comment about Rousseau's paper, fine. If you insist on pursuing this present line of bs I'll put you on iggy.
          MHG

          Comment


          • #20
            this is for Ro

            Yes I am part of a world conspiracy and am proud of it...
            ----David Rockefeller


            This is a paraphrase of a passage from Rockefeller's memoirs - for the verbatim quote keep reading...

            David Rockefeller, man at the top...

            At the top of the list of those who run the world, we have the major international banking houses, which control the global central banking system. From there, these dynastic banking families created an international network of think tanks, which socialised the ruling elites of each nation and the international community as a whole, into a cohesive transnational elite class. The foundations they established helped shape civil society both nationally and internationally, playing a major part in the funding – and thus coordinating and co-opting – of major social-political movements.

            An excellent example of one member of the top of the hierarchy of the global elite is David Rockefeller, patriarch of the Rockefeller family. Long serving as Chairman and CEO of Chase Manhattan bank, he revolutionised the notion of building a truly global bank. He was also Chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations, a founding member of Bilderberg and the Trilateral Commission, heavily involved in the family philanthropies, and sits atop a vast number of boards and foundations. Even Alan Greenspan, in a speech to the Council on Foreign Relations, said that David Rockefeller and the CFR have, “in many respects, formulated the foreign policy of this country.”36

            In another speech to the Council on Foreign Relations, then World Bank President James Wolfesohn, said in 2005, in honour of David Rockefeller’s 90th birthday, that, “the person who had perhaps the greatest influence on my life professionally in this country, and I’m very happy to say personally there afterwards, is David Rockefeller.” He then said, “In fact, it’s fair to say that there has been no other single family influence greater than the Rockefeller’s in the whole issue of globalisation and in the whole issue of addressing the questions which, in some ways, are still before us today. And for that David, we’re deeply grateful to you and for your own contribution in carrying these forward in the way that you did.”37

            David Rockefeller, himself, wrote, “For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicised incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterising my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”38

            36. CFR, Remarks at the Council on Foreign Relations Annual Corporate Conference, Transcripts: March 10, 2005.

            37. CFR, Council on Foreign Relations Special Symposium in honor of David Rockefeller’s 90th Birthday, Transcript: May 23, 2005.

            38. David Rockefeller, Memoirs, New York: Random House: 2002, 405

            http://www.thesurvivalistblog.net/wh...istBlog.net%29

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by mhgaffney View Post
              Dolt,

              You are living up to your name. If you have a substantive comment about Rousseau's paper, fine. If you insist on pursuing this present line of bs I'll put you on iggy.
              MHG
              Translation: If you don't agree with me, I'll cry.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by DenverBrit View Post
                Translation: If you don't agree with me, I'll cry.
                Look out Brit. He may just put you on iggy too!

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by The Lone Bolt View Post
                  Look out Brit. He may just put you on iggy too!
                  I'm already there....so he claims.

                  Comment


                  • #24

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      I'm still waiting for a substantive comment about the paper at the top of this thread.

                      Evidently, nonsense is the best you clowns can do. Are there any serious people out there?

                      MHG

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        You are on a football site you know.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          hahahahaaa

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            I would imagine planes hitting building and exploding would also cause a lot of seismic activity. Besides, what incompetent fool would put explosives near the top of a building and hope that brings the building down. If someone wanted to collapse a building, they would put the explosives at the base of the building. Or through the entire building like demolition experts do.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Wrong, the planes were traveling horizontal to the earth's surface and hit many floors above the ground. The impacts were absorbed and cushioned by the buildings. There was no coupling with the earth.

                              The seismic events were caused by explosives at the level of the ground or belowground - and therefor were coupled with the ground.

                              This is the only way a seismic signal can travel the distance to the sensors. MHG

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by mhgaffney View Post
                                Wrong, the planes were traveling horizontal to the earth's surface and hit many floors above the ground. The impacts were absorbed and cushioned by the buildings. There was no coupling with the earth.

                                The seismic events were caused by explosives at the level of the ground or belowground - and therefor were coupled with the ground.

                                This is the only way a seismic signal can travel the distance to the sensors. MHG
                                Brilliant deduction, Holmes!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X