Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Really Palin ? Nukes ?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Really Palin ? Nukes ?

    Wow so glad she's not in office. Is there a dumber person alive ? Rhetorical question I know she is. Anyways she thinks the only way to deal with Russia is Nuclear war.

    http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/20...good-guy-nuke/

  • #2
    MAD, based on the Nash Equilibrium, worked out for us.

    Comment


    • #3
      Is there a dumber person alive? Of Course, he's president.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by ColoradoDarin View Post
        Is there a dumber person alive? Of Course, he's president.
        Bingo!

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by ColoradoDarin View Post
          Is there a dumber person alive? Of Course, he's president.
          Yahtzee....

          Comment


          • #6
            da bomb, yo

            Comment


            • #7
              Yep,the pres is the dumb one because he's not starting WW3. Dipshets.....

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by ColoradoDarin View Post
                Is there a dumber person alive? Of Course, he's president.
                Biden is exponentially worse. He's a functional retard with an uncanny ability to be wrong 100% of the time.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Dr. Broncenstein View Post
                  Biden is exponentially worse. He's a functional retard with an uncanny ability to be wrong 100% of the time.
                  What does this have to do with Biden or Obama ?

                  So you guys are good to go on dropping the bomb then ?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Quoydogs View Post
                    What does this have to do with Biden or Obama ?

                    So you guys are good to go on dropping the bomb then ?
                    Sarah Palin has made millions and millions saying stupid and brash things... most have stopped listenign or caring, just trying to cash in again. Nobody takes her seriously even conservatives- compare her to Ted Cruz or even Michelle Bachman- they make Sarah looks like the lightweight-intellectual void of space she is.

                    Sarah sold me when she had no answer to what she reads to keep up on the news... jesus, just say the WSJ...

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      chiceknhawks!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by B-Large View Post
                        Sarah Palin has made millions and millions saying stupid and brash things... most have stopped listenign or caring, just trying to cash in again. Nobody takes her seriously even conservatives- compare her to Ted Cruz or even Michelle Bachman- they make Sarah looks like the lightweight-intellectual void of space she is.

                        Sarah sold me when she had no answer to what she reads to keep up on the news... jesus, just say the WSJ...
                        she reads all of them

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Seven different schools to score a degree in TV bimbo.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Quoydogs View Post
                            What does this have to do with Biden or Obama ?

                            So you guys are good to go on dropping the bomb then ?
                            I'm not a big Palin fan or anything, but she only appears to be making a (maybe overly-folksy) reference to the well-known doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction.

                            If you don't want to get nuked, have nukes. Pretty simple concept.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              L0L!

                              Bible Spice is back in the news and making a fool of herself again...
                              The Washington Post Delivers A Knock-Out Punch To Sarah Palin



                              The Washington Post delivered a knock-out punch to Sarah Palin on Monday in response to a Sunday post on her Facebook page calling out the Post.

                              In her Facebook post, Palin challenged the Washington Post “To reclaim your credibility (and the mainstream media’s, at large), I challenge you to engage in the same aggressive investigative journalism you courageously employed 42 years ago covering President Nixon.”

                              The public knows about President Obama’s incompetence, Palin added, but it would be “well-served” if the media would use its resources to uncover the truth regarding “Team Obama.”

                              On Monday, Washington Post published a rebuttal to Palin’s post beginning with a video clip of Palin’s now infamous interview with Katie Couric, during which Palin unable to name a single national publication that she read. Couric went on to win a Cronkite Award with the judges calling Couric’s interview with Palin a “defining moment in the 2008 presidential campaign.” A film clip was later leaked showing Couric mocking Palin.

                              Below is the clip of Palin fumbling the question about what publications she reads, followed by the Washington Post rebuttal.

                              “Sarah Palin slams The Washington Post, credits The Washington Post”
                              Hello Ms. Palin: We all know from your famous interview with Katie Couric that you’re not much of a reader of newspapers and magazines. When asked to name a specific one, you said, “I’ve read most of them, again, with a great appreciation for the press, for the media.” When pressed to name one, you said, “All of ‘em, any of ‘em that have been in front of me over all these years.” Pressed again, you said, “I have a vast variety of sources where we get our news…”

                              Now you’re showing some evidence that you’ve read The Washington Post, circa the early 1970s. In a recent Facebook post, you demonstrate some familiarity with this newspaper’s Watergate coverage, in an appeal to The Post’s current editors: “I challenge you to engage in the same aggressive investigative journalism you courageously employed 42 years ago covering President Nixon.”

                              You say, “The list of Obama abuses and impeachable offenses is long.”
                              But you say that The Post has “fallen like a lead balloon” and that “Those running the Washington Post’s show now, compared to those during the Nixon era, are too afraid of being uninvited to the permanent political class’ cocktail parties and petty gossip fests, making you all a bunch of wusses.”

                              Way to blast that Washington Post!

                              One problem, though: The post in which you blast the Washington Post sits about ten posts above this July 20 Facebook post of yours, which starts with these words:
                              Obama Knew of Border “Crisis” Prior to Reelection; Lied About That, Too!

                              The Washington Post has a bombshell article out about how “top officials at the White House and the State Department had repeatedly been warned of the potential for a further explosion in the number of migrant children since the crisis began escalating two years ago.”

                              Bold text added to note a contradiction in your timeline. In one Facebook post, you’re calling The Post wussies, and in an earlier one, you’re crediting its reporting for exposing a policy failure of the Obama administration. It’s not really a big deal, though. One remedy would be to delete the post that congratulates The Post for its July 19 story on the early warnings about the border crisis. Another remedy would be to amend your Post-slamming post to say something along the lines of: “You’ve fallen like a lead balloon, except for that sweet story last week about how the Obama administration had ample warning of the border crisis, as well as any other Obama administration-critical stories that I missed on account of my documented failure to read newspapers.”

                              A third approach would be to leave things as they are, on the safe assumption that no one looks to you for consistency anyhow.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X