Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

This Story of a Prof Who Fails His Entire Class to Illustrate Obama's Socialism Has the Left Furious

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Fedaykin
    replied
    Let me guess, same source as:

    Leave a comment:


  • Bronco Bob
    replied
    Epic Fail!

    Leave a comment:


  • houghtam
    replied
    Originally posted by Garcia Bronco View Post
    I know what I am talking about. I just don't have the time to educate you today or what everybody else already seems to know. The Roman Empire was an autocratic dictatorship. the Roman Republic was not. Are you sure you know what you're asking? The Roman Empire was not a Democracy. Had no principles generally speaking that you would call democratic.

    Like I said...Republics last longer.


    Believe me, I know both what I am asking and what I am talking about.

    "Capitalism will always outlast communism/socialism"

    Please, speak to the "capitalistic" tendencies of both the Republic and the Empire vs. their "socialist" tendencies. No, it most definitely doesn't depend on how you define the two.

    Leave a comment:


  • Garcia Bronco
    replied
    Originally posted by houghtam View Post
    Depends on definition? No, if you're going to make blanket statements like that about socialist policies, we need to be sure you know what you're talking about. The socialist influences which also were the basis for fascism in Europe were very different under Republican Rome than they were under the Roman Empire. What were they? Did one have more than the other? If so, how do you account for the fact that both lasted at least 500 years, with one lasting arguably far longer?
    I know what I am talking about. I just don't have the time to educate you today or what everybody else already seems to know. The Roman Empire was an autocratic dictatorship. the Roman Republic was not. Are you sure you know what you're asking? The Roman Empire was not a Democracy. Had no principles generally speaking that you would call democratic.

    Like I said...Republics last longer.

    Leave a comment:


  • houghtam
    replied
    Originally posted by Garcia Bronco View Post
    Athens is probably the best example vs the Roman Republic
    In you lifetime a number of democracies have sprung up and failed.
    Depends on definition? No, if you're going to make blanket statements like that about socialist policies, we need to be sure you know what you're talking about. The socialist influences which also were the basis for fascism in Europe were very different under Republican Rome than they were under the Roman Empire. What were they? Did one have more than the other? If so, how do you account for the fact that both lasted at least 500 years, with one lasting arguably far longer?

    Leave a comment:


  • Garcia Bronco
    replied
    Originally posted by houghtam View Post
    This statement wasn't very well researched.

    How long did the Roman Republic last? off the top of my head, roughly 500 years The Roman Empire? start would typically be considered when Ceaser took power, roughly 44 BC

    Which had more elements of socialism and fascism, the Republic or the Empire? depends on your definition of the two

    Further, can you give examples of Republics vs. Democracies? I'd like to see where you classify them, considering there have been very, very few true Democracies in the history of the world.
    Athens is probably the best example vs the Roman Republic
    In you lifetime a number of democracies have sprung up and failed.

    Leave a comment:


  • houghtam
    replied
    Originally posted by Garcia Bronco View Post
    No system is perpetual, but

    Republics last longer than Democracies, and Capitalism will always outlast Communism/Socialism.
    This statement wasn't very well researched.

    How long did the Roman Republic last? The Roman Empire?

    Which had more elements of socialism and fascism, the Republic or the Empire?

    Further, can you give examples of Republics vs. Democracies? I'd like to see where you classify them, considering there have been very, very few true Democracies in the history of the world.

    Leave a comment:


  • Garcia Bronco
    replied
    Originally posted by Irish Stout View Post
    Communism and socialism are two different things. The example in the OP is more akin to communism. We've been a capitalist-socialist country for quite awhile.
    I didn't say they were exactly the same thing, but for the purposes of my point they are....which is not as long lasting as what we currently use. Generally speaking they are the same or rather one is the product of the other..

    Leave a comment:


  • DenverBrit
    replied
    Originally posted by txtebow View Post
    Stay on point and address the article that is the subject of this thread you cowards...


    Still posting fairy tales.

    Leave a comment:


  • ghwk
    replied
    Originally posted by houghtam View Post


    http://www.snopes.com/college/exam/socialism.asp

    I knew I heard this stupid **** somewhere before...

    Bwhaha and Barry came to its rescue!!

    Hey Barry may want to do some research before you post!

    Leave a comment:


  • houghtam
    replied


    http://www.snopes.com/college/exam/socialism.asp

    I knew I heard this stupid **** somewhere before...

    Leave a comment:


  • barryr
    replied
    Originally posted by ghwk View Post
    You know every post of yours is EXACTLY the same content. Different words, at least a few of them, but you are the epitome of broken record poster.
    I know truth hurts, but too bad. I know liberals don't like hearing or seeing the truth about themselves, mainly their hypocrisy, but don't worry, I'll remind you. You don't like it? Oh, well, cry to someone who cares. At least I can do so without following people around just to make personal insults on posters and can do so without making threats, unlike the actions of many liberals around here.

    Leave a comment:


  • Irish Stout
    replied
    Originally posted by Garcia Bronco View Post
    No system is perpetual, but

    Republics last longer than Democracies, and Capitalism will always outlast Communism/Socialism.
    Communism and socialism are two different things. The example in the OP is more akin to communism. We've been a capitalist-socialist country for quite awhile.

    Leave a comment:


  • Garcia Bronco
    replied
    No system is perpetual, but

    Republics last longer than Democracies, and Capitalism will always outlast Communism/Socialism.

    Leave a comment:


  • ghwk
    replied
    Originally posted by barryr View Post
    As what will typically happen, the liberals around here will just make silly, childish comments about posters because the subject matter is too uncomfortable to make a reasoned comment. Not that making "reasoned" comments come easy for them anyway. It's all about feelings and childlike views of the world, not to mention being masters of hypocrisy on every issue. Liberals love everyone sacrificing as long as that doesn't include them doing it of course.
    You know every post of yours is EXACTLY the same content. Different words, at least a few of them, but you are the epitome of broken record poster.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X