Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bloomberg's history of supporting stop and frisk : "All the crime is in the minority areas"

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by Dr.10-307 View Post

    There you go! How about you go pull up the “racist and xenophobic” New York City, Chicago, Baltimore crime statistics?
    As if such statistics would support your disingenuous claims...

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by Dr.10-307 View Post

      Yes. He was telling the truth. Admit it and move on.
      Dr. Deplorable doesn’t seem to appreciate the seriousness of the “glass houses” problem he has here...

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by L.A. BRONCOS FAN View Post

        As if such statistics would support your disingenuous claims...
        You can’t solve problems if you won’t admit the problem exists. All you do is make excuses. YOU are part of the problem.

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by Dr.10-307 View Post

          The issue has nothing to do with Bloomberg as it’s common knowledge that inner city minorities have a crime problem. My issue is that you, other Democrats, and the media fail to admit the problem exists and make excuses when confronted about your double standards. Admit you have a problem and confront the problem, not the people that point it out.
          Why do you think there is a disproportionate amount of crime with inner city minorities?

          The question shouldn’t be “if” there is a problem. The question should be “why” there is a problem and what is the solution?

          Comment


          • #50
            First off, it should be acknowledged there are no "victims" of stop-and-frisk - merely people who are delayed and inconvenienced.

            Police brutality is a separate issue ... Profiling is also a separate issue.


            ​​​​​I want to know if Bloomberg's statistics are accurate. If they are, then he was approaching it like the businessman he is: Identify the problem, then implement steps to address it. If his statistics are wrong, he should be drawn and quartered in a public square.

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by BroncoBuff View Post
              First off, it should be acknowledged there are no "victims" of stop-and-frisk - merely people who are delayed and inconvenienced.

              Police brutality is a separate issue ... Profiling is also a separate issue.


              ​​​​​I want to know if Bloomberg's statistics are accurate. If they are, then he was approaching it like the businessman he is: Identify the problem, then implement steps to address it. If his statistics are wrong, he should be drawn and quartered in a public square.
              Well, everyone’s missing the real question. Did he say it when he was a Republican?

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by spdirty View Post

                Why do you think there is a disproportionate amount of crime with inner city minorities?

                The question shouldn’t be “if” there is a problem. The question should be “why” there is a problem and what is the solution?
                First of all, they need to admit the problem exists and quit making excuses. Then, maybe they can figure out how raise children that are less likely to embrace a crime culture. Kids need fathers in their lives and they need to stay in school. Gangs need to be eradicated and law enforcement needs to be respected.


                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by Dr.10-307 View Post

                  First of all, they need to admit the problem exists and quit making excuses. Then, maybe they can figure out how raise children that are less likely to embrace a crime culture. Kids need fathers in their lives and they need to stay in school. Gangs need to be eradicated and law enforcement needs to be respected.

                  F the police!

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by Dr.10-307 View Post

                    First of all, they need to admit the problem exists and quit making excuses. Then, maybe they can figure out how raise children that are less likely to embrace a crime culture. Kids need fathers in their lives and they need to stay in school. Gangs need to be eradicated and law enforcement needs to be respected.


                    You don't say! You have a degree in child psychology? Or you get that from the vaunted magazine: Wisdom of Captain Obvious?

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by L.A. BRONCOS FAN View Post

                      Dr. Deplorable doesn’t seem to appreciate the seriousness of the “glass houses” problem he has here...
                      The glass houses are those liberals like you who have claimed in no small part that alleged sound bytes from Trump that upset people render him in and of themselves an unelectable knuckle-dragger.

                      Clearly the shoe doesn't fit on the other foot thus you're exposed as a bunch of lying, braying hacks.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by BroncoBuff View Post
                        First off, it should be acknowledged there are no "victims" of stop-and-frisk - merely people who are delayed and inconvenienced.
                        Such a rationalization could be used for segregated busing, restaurant seating, and bathroom facilities. It's not racist victimization, merely inconveniences and delays. Somehow I don't think you'd attempt that nor would you accept someone if they did.

                        The question is why you've chosen to make that argument here, and now.


                        ​​​​​
                        I want to know if Bloomberg's statistics are accurate. If they are, then he was approaching it like the businessman he is: Identify the problem, then implement steps to address it. If his statistics are wrong, he should be drawn and quartered in a public square.
                        If Trump said all the crime was in the minority areas, nobody would be quietly, politely inquiring as to the accuracy of those stats. Rather, there would be screaming mobs and staged protests to oust the bigot.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by L.A. BRONCOS FAN View Post

                          As if such statistics would support your disingenuous claims...
                          I don't see you upset Bloomberg stereotyping minority communities as having "all the crime."

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by nyuk nyuk View Post
                            Such a rationalization could be used for segregated busing, restaurant seating, and bathroom facilities. It's not racist victimization, merely inconveniences and delays.
                            Good point, but there is a big difference: Those "policies" were motivated purely by racism. This policy was motivated to fight crime. Words matter. Don't dilute the word "victim."


                            Originally posted by nyuk
                            If Trump said all the crime was in the minority areas, nobody would be quietly, politely inquiring as to the accuracy of those stats.
                            Wow, it's been awhile since anybody called me quiet and polite, thank you.

                            Bloomberg's problem is: He talked about crime abatement policies in terms of race - IDIOT!!! There's only ONE way to talk about it: Location, location, location. I know something about this topic (for whatever that statement's worth on a message board), and crime abatement planning is about sector-precinct-patrol-block. Location, location, location. He should have had maps and charts at that press conference. The minute he uttered the words black or brown, he lost. Idiot.

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by nyuKKK

                              The glass houses are those liberals like you who have claimed in no small part that alleged sound bytes from Trump that upset people render him in and of themselves an unelectable knuckle-dragger.

                              Clearly the shoe doesn't fit on the other foot thus you're exposed as a bunch of lying, braying hacks.
                              ^

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by nyuKKK

                                I don't see you upset Bloomberg stereotyping minority communities as having "all the crime."
                                The question is: why does it upset you?

                                After all, according to you and your white power pals, Bloomberg is just "stating a fact," right nyuKKK?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X