Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ukraine for Dummies...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ukraine for Dummies...

    The following brilliant piece by Ray McGovern is a must read. It would also be hilariously funny -- if the matter were not so dark.

    Ukraine For Dummies

    By Ray McGovern


    November 15, 2019 "Information Clearing House" - At Wednesday’s debut of the impeachment hearings there was one issue upon which both sides of the aisle seemed to agree, and it was a comic-book caricature of reality.

    House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff led off the proceedings with this: “In 2014, Russia invaded a United States ally, Ukraine, to reverse that nation’s embrace of the West, and to fulfill Vladimir Putin’s desire to rebuild a Russian empire…”

    Five years ago, when Ukraine first came into the news, those Americans who thought Ukraine was an island in the Pacific can perhaps be forgiven. That members of the House Intelligence Committee don’t know — or pretend not to know — more accurate information about Ukraine is a scandal, and a consequential one.

    As Professor Stephen Cohen has warned, if the impeachment process does not deal in objective fact, already high tensions with Russia are likely to become even more dangerous.


    https://consortiumnews.com/2019/11/1...e-for-dummies/


    Victoria Nuland plots regime change in Ukraine

    Also check out this MUST LISTEN Youtube recording of a leaked 2014 phone conversation between Victoria Nuland, Hillary's Assistant Sec of State and US ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt -- as the two discuss how to hasten the US orchestrated coup to bring about regime change in Ukraine.

    The tape of the conversation was leaked to them world press on 4 February 2014.

    https://youtu.be/WV9J6sxCs5k

    At one point in the conversation, Nuland says: F*** the EU....
    Last edited by mhgaffney; 11-15-2019, 07:59 PM.

  • #2
    Here's some Ukraine for you, dummy.

    Comment


    • #3
      When will tRump fluffers and tin foil nutters like Comrade Gaffo ever learn?

      The real ‘deep state’ is about corporate power, not entrenched bureaucrats


      With impeachment hearings underway, conservatives’ favorite catchphrase, the “deep state,” has gotten a thorough airing. Stephen Miller, the White House’s hard-line immigration adviser, called the Ukraine whistleblower a “saboteur,” adding, “I know the difference between a whistleblower and a deep state operative.” Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), an ally of President Trump, described GOP colleagues insufficiently protective of the administration as people “whose allegiance is more to the Deep State than it is to the president.” “‘Deep state’ diplomats caught up in Trump impeachment fight back,” said the Washington Times, reporting on current and former diplomats testifying for impeachment investigators.

      As the author who popularized this term, I’m invoking the privilege of correcting them. There is no deep state as the right imagines it — that is, a secret cabal of government insiders hellbent on undermining the White House. Rather, it is Trump himself, under the camouflage of populist rhetoric, who has overseen the open expansion of the deep state: entrenched interests gaining outsize influence and setting their own policy agenda, unchecked by the will of the people, their elected representatives or the civil servants meant to regulate them.

      I wrote my book “The Deep State” to capture a phenomenon I had noticed over my 30 years as a Republican staffer in Congress. Despite the fiercely partisan atmosphere of the Obama presidency, policy largely remained on the same course as under his predecessor, George W. Bush, who had foundered on the twin rocks of a Middle East quagmire and a financial meltdown. Barack Obama continued Bush’s misadventures abroad while committing a huge, unforced error of his own by intervening in Libya. He cleaned up the financial crash by bailing out banks but providing little relief to homeowners. Even his health-care bill, which Republicans decried as virtual Stalinism, copied the conservative Heritage Foundation’s 1990s proposal. It seemed that whichever party controlled government, a kind of GPS ensured that the arrow always pointed in the same direction: toward money.

      The term “deep state” first came into wide usage in Turkeys in the 1990s, and described the combination of finance, industry, and military and intelligence organizations in Turkey that made certain that policies would remain the same, no matter how the government changed. I first encountered it in the John le Carré novel “A Delicate Truth,” which describes British financial and private intelligence circles knowing secrets long before cabinet ministers did.

      “Deep state” seemed to fit: On the Hill, we used to remark how corporate lobbyists always knew the inside dope, and the dirt, first. The real power-lobbyists tended to concentrate in a few sectors: the military-industrial complex, of course (which Dwight Eisenhower warned us about); financial services, supercharged after decades of deregulation; and information technology, with its trillion-dollar companies. Boosted by the revolving door that lets those industries’ executives shuttle through government policy positions, and unfettered by any meaningful campaign finance limitations, that concentration of power formed the basis of the deep state. No conspiracies in the dark of night, no grassy knoll, no Area 51. The players are known, their actions legal.

      When I published “The Deep State” in 2016, it garnered favorable reviews and some affirmation on the left. But in the fever swamps of the far right, where conspiracy theories about black helicopters and FEMA concentration camps were the daily diet, the book really raised the temperature. In 2016, “deep state” appeared only 64 times in TV transcripts, according to an NPR analysis. In 2017, the phrase rocketed to 2,300 mentions, and then to almost 5,000 in 2018.

      The term quickly became a cliche, spawning copycat books by right-wing ankle-biters, in which they labeled whatever they disliked the “deep state.” Former congressman Jason Chaffetz wrote that the deep state consists of “an army of bureaucrats” who shielded Obama and are out to undermine Trump’s agenda. Other authors have claimed that the deep state’s mission is to “replace our Nationalist state with a Globalist-Communist State.” Roger Stone, a longtime Trump confidant and Republican fixer, even offered it as an explanation for his car accident last year: “I am a consistent critic of the ‘Deep State’ — that’s why I think I’m targeted.” It became clear to me that political ideas, once loosed into the world, are like viruses: They spread, mutate and become antibiotic-resistant.

      When Trump entered the Oval Office on a promise to “drain the swamp,” he was already the right’s avatar for the struggle against the imagined deep state. And when, in 2017, Trump adviser Steve Bannon said he suspected that something like the deep state was trying to undermine his boss, the phrase became an official Republican weapon. Trump himself has used it in a barrage of tweets and speeches, including at a rally in Louisiana last month.

      The irony becomes obvious when we examine the Trump administration’s policies, which have taken the worst features of his predecessors and put them on steroids. His Cabinet of billionaires and centimillionaires, like Betsy DeVos, Wilbur Ross and Steve Mnuchin, makes Bush’s appointees look like a Bolshevik workers’ council. Trump’s tax cuts are overwhelmingly tilted toward the rich. The Pentagon is even more bloated than before. The president presides over rampant self-dealing (such as holding official events at his own properties and failing to divest his holdings or place them in a blind trust) that may even exceed the Harding administration’s corruption.

      And it is Trump who established a shadow foreign ministry of private individuals like Rudolph Giuliani and his associates, accountable neither to the State Department nor Congress. Mounds of witness testimony suggest that these people bullied and extorted a friendly country, Ukraine, pressuring it to assist Trump’s reelection. As congressional Democrats have started investigating this abuse of the public trust, Trump allies have denounced their efforts as a deep state “coup.”

      Trump, who campaigned on fighting the deep state, has instead installed the deep state 2.0: even more corrupt, more contemptuous and more in-your-face to citizens who object. In voting to throw the bums out, his supporters got the same old policies, only this time exacerbated by unbridled corruption and contempt for the Constitution. Hoping to drive the deep state away, they installed it in the seat of power, where it’s sprawled out more comfortably than ever.


      https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlo...7HUsDDr59v_SGU

      Comment


      • #4
        So typical of LABF to refer us to the flagship newspaper of the Deep State, the Washington Post. Which is now accusing Trump of "shadow foreign policies..." This is classic Orwellian doublespeak...

        The real issue with Ukraine is the broken US promise not to expand NATO eastward... Turn off your tv set...and tune in to what our top Russia expert Dr Stephen Cohen is telling us.

        Why Are We in Ukraine?
        By Stephen F. Cohen

        http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/52557.htm

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by mhgaffney View Post
          So typical of LABF to refer us to the flagship newspaper of the Deep State, the Washington Post. Which is now accusing Trump of "shadow foreign policies..." This is classic Orwellian doublespeak...

          The real issue with Ukraine is the broken US promise not to expand NATO eastward... Turn off your tv set...and tune in to what our top Russia expert Dr Stephen Cohen is telling us.

          Why Are We in Ukraine?
          By Stephen F. Cohen

          http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/52557.htm
          Comrade Gaffo is stuck in the Ministry of Truth and he can’t get out...

          Comment


          • #6
            Another cartoon that misses the point...

            Comment

            Working...
            X