Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Deutsche Bank Staff Saw Suspicious Activity in Trump and Kushner Accounts

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Deutsche Bank Staff Saw Suspicious Activity in Trump and Kushner Accounts

    JACKSONVILLE, Fla. — Anti-money laundering specialists at Deutsche Bank recommended in 2016 and 2017 that multiple transactions involving legal entities controlled by Donald J. Trump and his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, be reported to a federal financial-crimes watchdog.

    The transactions, some of which involved Mr. Trump’s now-defunct foundation, set off alerts in a computer system designed to detect illicit activity, according to five current and former bank employees. Compliance staff members who then reviewed the transactions prepared so-called suspicious activity reports that they believed should be sent to a unit of the Treasury Department that polices financial crimes.

    But executives at Deutsche Bank, which has lent billions of dollars to the Trump and Kushner companies, rejected their employees’ advice. The reports were never filed with the government.

    -------------

    But former Deutsche Bank employees said the decision not to report the Trump and Kushner transactions reflected the bank’s generally lax approach to money laundering laws. The employees — most of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity to preserve their ability to work in the industry — said it was part of a pattern of the bank’s executives rejecting valid reports to protect relationships with lucrative clients.

    “You present them with everything, and you give them a recommendation, and nothing happens,” said Tammy McFadden, a former Deutsche Bank anti-money laundering specialist who reviewed some of the transactions. “It’s the D.B. way. They are prone to discounting everything.”

    Ms. McFadden said she was terminated last year after she raised concerns about the bank’s practices. Since then, she has filed complaints with the Securities and Exchange Commission and other regulators about the bank’s anti-money-laundering enforcement.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...cid=spartanntp

  • #2

    Comment


    • #3

      Comment


      • #4
        .

        Comment


        • #5

          Comment


          • #6

            Comment


            • #7

              Comment


              • #8

                Comment


                • #9
                  So hillary is the president now?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by IQ33
                    So hillary is the president now?
                    Listening to tRump lemmings like you, it would be easy to get that impression.

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	59754507_2314261308848950_4715557173961162752_n.jpg?_nc_cat=111&_nc_ht=scontent.fbkk8-3.fna&oh=dd47e475f18b9fef0e6a823fac4efe7d&oe=5D9A91BB.jpg
Views:	262
Size:	57.3 KB
ID:	2463581

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I see the nattering, blathering righties are still.....well, nattering and blathering.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        In for the updates and to watch a few heads explode over the fact that Dons dead bodies keep unburying themselves.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Nothing burger, Mueller Report clearly stated their is no collusion or obstruction or anything illegal. MAGAts!!!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by El Minion View Post
                            Nothing burger, Mueller Report clearly stated their is no collusion or obstruction or anything illegal. MAGAts!!!
                            First of all, you haven't seen an unredacted version, second, no it didn't clearly state that, 3rd I bet you haven't even read the report, you're just going off of the Barr summary. In fact, Mueller released a statement saying he was dissatisfied with the initial summary from Barr. Damn some of you are really really stupid.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by ZONA View Post

                              First of all, you haven't seen an unredacted version, second, no it didn't clearly state that, 3rd I bet you haven't even read the report, you're just going off of the Barr summary. In fact, Mueller released a statement saying he was dissatisfied with the initial summary from Barr. Damn some of you are really really stupid.
                              I am pretty sure that was post was made in jest.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X