Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Climate Change in the Coloradan Mind

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Pony Boy View Post
    [...]
    One news story from a journalist counts as "many"?

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Pony Boy View Post
      Yes, funny how many are linking the flooding in Boulder to global warming but when the Big Thompson Canyon flooded in 1976 and killed 140, it was just a freak act of nature that happens every 100 years or so.
      The Big Thompson flood was in July when it is normal (or always had been) to get the heavier rains (May is the heaviest). We're in mid-September, which normally has one of the lowest precipitation averages.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by Rohirrim View Post
        The Big Thompson flood was in July when it is normal (or always had been) to get the heavier rains (May is the heaviest). We're in mid-September, which normally has one of the lowest precipitation averages.
        Rightard: "what global warming? It's flooding...derp"

        Comment


        • #64
          And two more conservatives demonstrate their mastery of the concept of climate vs. weather.

          You guys should teach a class.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by houghtam View Post
            And two more conservatives demonstrate their mastery of the concept of climate vs. weather.

            You guys should teach a class.

            You do realize you kiddies blame just about every kind of bad anything on Global Warmins.

            Drought. Heavy Rains. Snow. Lack of Snow. Wildfire. Floods. It's all been laid at the feet of the Warmins by Scientological Apocalysts at one time or another.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by BroncoBeavis View Post
              You do realize you kiddies blame just about every kind of bad anything on Global Warmins.

              Drought. Heavy Rains. Snow. Lack of Snow. Wildfire. Floods. It's all been laid at the feet of the Warmins by Scientological Apocalysts at one time or another.
              No.

              When there are trends, however, people tend to say those things.

              You guys, on the other hand, are captains of the "NURRRR It's 70 in July...where's da global warming, guys? NURRRR" club.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by BroncoBeavis View Post
                You do realize you kiddies blame just about every kind of bad anything on Global Warmins.

                Drought. Heavy Rains. Snow. Lack of Snow. Wildfire. Floods. It's all been laid at the feet of the Warmins by Scientological Apocalysts at one time or another.
                You do realize you simply ignore what doesn't fit your agenda.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by houghtam View Post
                  No.

                  When there are trends, however, people tend to say those things.

                  You guys, on the other hand, are captains of the "NURRRR It's 70 in July...where's da global warming, guys? NURRRR" club.

                  http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming...-global-4.html

                  http://www.ucsusa.org/news/press_rel...ding-0540.html

                  Please, go on.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Changes in climate can impact weather events.

                    You just learned something. If it sank in.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      And once again, Beavis demonstrates why he's a lost cause.

                      How many times do you have to post an article without reading it before you just give up?

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Just highlighting how virtually any natural event anywhere can feed this perfect circle of confirmation bias you guys have built for yourself.

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by BroncoBeavis View Post
                          Just highlighting how virtually any natural event anywhere can feed this perfect circle of confirmation bias you guys have built for yourself.
                          No, you highlighted how you are talking out of your ass and have no real understanding of the issue, just like you have so many times.

                          Congrats, Beavis.

                          You're the new cutthemdown.

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Originally posted by houghtam View Post
                            No, you highlighted how you are talking out of your ass and have no real understanding of the issue, just like you have so many times.

                            Congrats, Beavis.

                            You're the new cutthemdown.

                            Coming from The Quintessential Asstalking Virtuoso, that really means something.

                            To somebody.
                            Somewhere.
                            Maybe.

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by houghtam View Post
                              No, you highlighted how you are talking out of your ass and have no real understanding of the issue, just like you have so many times.

                              Congrats, Beavis.

                              You're the new cutthemdown.

                              Beavis' argument is that the sheer volume of signs leading to the confirmation of AGW is proof that it can't be true.

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by Rohirrim View Post
                                Beavis' argument is that the sheer volume of signs leading to the confirmation of AGW is proof that it can't be true.
                                It's not the sheer volume of signs that indicates a problem. It's the number of places alarmists keep looking for signs.

                                If your search for global climate truth lands you looking around a certain town or state with some flooding, you're not really looking for truth in the first place.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X