Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Republicans and Corruption Acceptance

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by BroncoBeavis View Post
    How many special councils were named in each case?

    Why the discrepancy?
    The Special Counsel was named because Trump fired Comey, Dipsh!t...

    Comment


    • #32
      It doesn't take much intellect to write an article with a slew of unsubstantiated allegations over the years and claim they "tar" the object in question.

      Interestingly, the prog writers that attempt such things with Trump never did it under Clinton, in spite of the many women that came forward with allegations of everything from sexual harassment to rape.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Pontius Pirate View Post
        Lol Trump is definitely beating Hillary in how many his teams indictments have racked up (this graph needs updating stat!)
        Hi, Einstein.

        Not one "indictment" mentioned in your retarded meme is related to "Russia collusion."

        What someone does on his own private time is neither relevant to Trump or the Mueller investigation.

        Try harder next time, and make sure you keep it honest for once.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Guess Who View Post
          The Special Counsel was named because Trump fired Comey, Dip****...
          Meanwhile the Clintons had a tarmac buddy firmly in control. Good point. That's why the difference.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by nyuk nyuk View Post
            Hi, Einstein.

            Not one "indictment" mentioned in your retarded meme is related to "Russia collusion."

            What someone does on his own private time is neither relevant to Trump or the Mueller investigation.

            Try harder next time, and make sure you keep it honest for once.
            Why do you think Deutsche Bank gave Trump hundreds of millions of dollars at the same time that Wall Street banks had blacklisted him, shortly after which, Deutsche Bank was fined $10 billion for laundering Russian mob money? Not to mention, Trump hotels all over the world appear to be hotbeds of Russian money laundering.

            Please explain.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by BroncoBeavis View Post
              Meanwhile the Clintons had a tarmac buddy firmly in control. Good point. That's why the difference.


              Oops!

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by nyuk nyuk View Post
                Hi, Einstein.

                Not one "indictment" mentioned in your retarded meme is related to "Russia collusion."

                What someone does on his own private time is neither relevant to Trump or the Mueller investigation.

                Try harder next time, and make sure you keep it honest for once.
                Lol the Mueller investigation isn’t even over yet and Manafort is sitting in court right now talking about his role in the Trump administration

                https://www.politico.com/story/2018/...t-trial-766439

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by L.A. BRONCOS FAN View Post
                  Yes, Fox News star.

                  And candidate for U.S. Senate.

                  Not my fault that the facts are inconvenient for you.
                  User-authored crap isn't "fact," regardless of how much affinity you may have for it. Daily Kos is known for junk articles written by random shmucks.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Pontius Pirate View Post
                    Lol the Mueller investigation isn’t even over yet and Manafort is sitting in court right now talking about his role in the Trump administration

                    https://www.politico.com/story/2018/...t-trial-766439
                    Ooh "his role." Well ****, there's "collusion" for you and ****, etc.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Rohirrim View Post
                      Why do you think Deutsche Bank gave Trump hundreds of millions of dollars at the same time that Wall Street banks had blacklisted him, shortly after which, Deutsche Bank was fined $10 billion for laundering Russian mob money? Not to mention, Trump hotels all over the world appear to be hotbeds of Russian money laundering.

                      Please explain.
                      It's very simple: Your entire argument is correlation-equals-causation fallacy and thus has no basis.

                      "Appear to be" isn't an argument. I'm sure many legitimate business owners have been subject to people attempting money laundering and other scams under their noses, and only in the case of someone you hate anyway, do you assume these supposed incidents are proof of something.

                      You suffer from crippling confirmation bias.


                      con·fir·ma·tion bi·as
                      noun
                      noun: confirmation bias
                      the tendency to interpret new evidence as confirmation of one's existing beliefs or theories.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by BroncoBeavis View Post
                        Meanwhile the Clintons had a tarmac buddy firmly in control. Good point. That's why the difference.
                        WTH does that have to do with anything? Anything at all?

                        So lets get this straight. I owned you and told you why the special counsel was all Trump's doing and you pull the Hillary card.... lol
                        Attached Files

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by nyuk nyuk View Post
                          It's very simple: Your entire argument is correlation-equals-causation fallacy and thus has no basis.

                          "Appear to be" isn't an argument. I'm sure many legitimate business owners have been subject to people attempting money laundering and other scams under their noses, and only in the case of someone you hate anyway, do you assume these supposed incidents are proof of something.

                          You suffer from crippling confirmation bias.


                          con·fir·ma·tion bi·as
                          noun
                          noun: confirmation bias
                          the tendency to interpret new evidence as confirmation of one's existing beliefs or theories.
                          You apply the EXACT same logic to the dossier.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by Guess Who View Post
                            WTH does that have to do with anything? Anything at all?

                            So lets get this straight. I owned you and told you why the special counsel was all Trump's doing and you pull the Hillary card.... lol
                            Uh, again, I didn't pull in the Hillary card. You'll have to point that finger elsewhere.

                            And since y'all apparently want to go there, I'll highlight the difference between a truly independent prosecution and one that was deliberately kept internal in order to do fun stuff like literally immunize everyone possibly guilty of or party to various felonies.

                            You guys can seal clap it all you want. I'm just not going to leave the truth about that sham investigation unsaid while you do so.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              This just in $56,000 of tax payer money spent at Trump Hotel in D.C.

                              Directly profiting off being President.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by nyuKKK
                                User-authored crap isn't "fact," regardless of how much affinity you may have for it. Daily Kos is known for junk articles written by random shmucks.


                                "Yap yap yap...attack the messenger because I can't refute the message...yap yap yap..."

                                Don't you know any other logical fallacies, Drama Llama?

                                Your **** is getting repetitive.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X