former CIA agent: Israel will attack Iran in September

[mhgaffney]

Robert Baer is the author of Sleeping with the Devil.
MHG


Ex-CIA officer: Israel likely to attack Iran in September

Robert Baer tells LA KPFK radio that strike on Tehran likely to happen before vote on Palestinian state, that PM wants US to be involved


http://www.jpost.com/Defense/Article.aspx?id=229605

While Robert Baer didn’t reveal the sources behind his prediction, he referred to former Mossad chief Meir Dagan’s warnings of an Israeli attack on Iran as “no bluff.”

Baer told the KPFK Radio on Tuesday recent comments made by Dagan that an Israeli attack on Iran could lead to a regional war, “tell us with near certainty that [Prime Minister Binyamin] Netanyahu is planning an attack, and in as much as I can guess when it’s going to be, it’s probably going to be in September, before a [UN General Assembly] vote on the Palestinian state.”

Netanyahu is “also hoping to draw the United States into the conflict – and in fact, there’s a warning order inside the Pentagon to prepare for conflict with Iran,” Baer said.

The retired senior CIA officer predicted that Israel would attack the Natanz nuclear facility, as well as “a couple of others to degrade their capabilities.”

“The Iranians will strike back where they can, and that will be in Basra and in Baghdad,” where the US has a reduced troop presence, Baer said.

“We’ve started to look at Iran’s targets in Iraq and across the border,” he said.

Baer, however, said a regional war was unlikely.

“What we’re facing here is an escalation, not a planned all-out war,” he said.

There was no response from the Prime Minister’s Office in Jerusalem.

[underrated29]

the source was that guy who thought the world would end a few months ago and changed it to octoboer. This falls into his timeline.

[W*GS]

This is a re-run of an episode of "Gaffe's Wacky World of Jew Hatred" that was originally shown three years ago.

[DenverBrit]

Gaffney, you need to update your act!

[That One Guy]

Gaff, wanna put your Mane account on this guy's reputation?

If Israel does a full on attack (None of this they cyber attacked BS) by Oct 1, we'll stop making fun of all your threads. If there's no attack by Oct 1, you can't post anything but football talk until next season. Deal? Or do you not believe this fool either?

[theAPAOps5]

Did he talk to that Russian general who said the same thng 2 years ago.

[The Lone Bolt]

So when no such military action occurs are you just going to go to "cyber attack" like last time Gaff?

[mhgaffney]

As usual the knee jerks attack the messenger. If you don't like the prediction -- take it up with Robert Baer.

W*G's standard reaction of accusing me of being anti semitic would be humorous if the issues were not so dire.

As for Brit's post about me updating my act -- someone please inform him that history has a way of repeating every few years. The updates are in fact the same old story -- endlessly repeated.

MHG

[That One Guy]

Originally Posted by mhgaffney

As usual the knee jerks attack the messenger. If you don't like the prediction -- take it up with Robert Baer.

W*G's standard reaction of accusing me of being anti semitic would be humorous if the issues were not so dire.

As for Brit's post about me updating my act -- someone please inform him that history has a way of repeating every few years. The updates are in fact the same old story -- endlessly repeated.

MHG

Idiots make silly predictions every day. We don't make a thread about every one of them. It'd be the equivalent of making a thread about every rapture prediction and get perturbed because no one is taking the prediction serious. Has any of your insight ever come to fruition?

[mhgaffney]

Yeah sure -- but this one is a former CIA agent, author and celebrity.

As for insight coming to fruition -- yes of course. Many of us predicted the attack on Iraq beforehand and attempted to stop it. Even though millions of people demonstrated against another war -- we failed to stop it.

There were many idiots like you -- back then too -- sitting on their hands, or cheering Bush, or jeering at the peace activists.

The only thing that is certain is that history will repeat again -- IF we do not turn the tide.
MHG

[DenverBrit]

Originally Posted by mhgaffney

As usual the knee jerks attack the messenger. If you don't like the prediction -- take it up with Robert Baer.

W*G's standard reaction of accusing me of being anti semitic would be humorous if the issues were not so dire.

As for Brit's post about me updating my act -- someone please inform him that history has a way of repeating every few years. The updates are in fact the same old story -- endlessly repeated.

MHG

Nothing to do with history and everything to do with your conspiracy and predictive posts.

As for 'informing' me about history, you can't be serious.

No one has posted as much laughably inaccurate nonsense as you.

[ant1999e]

IMO Robert Baer is a respectable source. I'm not saying it'll happen or that Gaff isn't crazy.

[The Lone Bolt]

Originally Posted by mhgaffney

Yeah sure -- but this one is a former CIA agent, author and celebrity.

As for insight coming to fruition -- yes of course. Many of us predicted the attack on Iraq beforehand and attempted to stop it. Even though millions of people demonstrated against another war -- we failed to stop it.

There were many idiots like you -- back then too -- sitting on their hands, or cheering Bush, or jeering at the peace activists.

The only thing that is certain is that history will repeat again -- IF we do not turn the tide.
MHG

About two years ago you predicted (based on a statement by Scott Ritter) that an attack on Iran by the United States was "imminent."

Then when no military attack on Iran occurred you insisted that the U.S. did attack Iran as predicted but it was a "cyber attack."

So my questions is this: if no military action against Iran occurs in this instance as well, are you just going to fall back on "cyber attack" again (or some equally lame excuse) or are you going to step up and admit that Baer was wrong?

[mhgaffney]

Originally Posted by DenverBrit

Nothing to do with history and everything to do with your conspiracy and predictive posts.

As for 'informing' me about history, you can't be serious.

No one has posted as much laughably inaccurate nonsense as you.

My predictive posts?

I have made none except to warn about history repeating.

Yours is the response of a clown -- a guy who never in his whole life went two steps out of his way to learn the truth about anything --

except for maybe trivia.

[DenverBrit]

Originally Posted by mhgaffney

My predictive posts?

I have made none except to warn about history repeating.

Yours is the response of a clown -- a guy who never in his whole life went two steps out of his way to learn the truth about anything --

except for maybe trivia.

Bull****!!

Originally Posted by mhgaffney

This report speaks for itself. MHG

http://www.onlinenews.com.pk/details.php?id=100487


America will attack Iran, Syria in October: Gul

RAWALPINDI: The former chief of ISI, Maj. Gen (R) Hameed Gul has "predicted" that America would definitely attack Iran and Syria simultaneously in October.

He was talking after attending the Hamdard Majlis Shoora, Tuesday evening. He also condemned the lackluster and weak reaction of Pakistan and Islamic bloc about Israel’s attack of Lebanon.

Analyzing the current war scenario he observed that war has both political and strategic factors and despite "using" Israel, America has lost the war in Lebanon, where masses have united against the recent Israeli onslaught, and would have been more formidable if the generals of Saddam had not sold out to American dollars.

He analyzed that Israel would soon be "forced" to stop its land strikes but would continue its horrific and heinous air strikes against Lebanon, converting it to ruins.

He also "predicted" that after Iran and Syria, Saudi Arabia would also meet the same fate, followed by Pakistan.

[Boomhauer]

Israel has long declared they'll launch preeminent attacks against Iran because Iran doesn't like them. Would Iran be more justified in launching preeminent attacks against Israel for their declaration of intended war?

Despite who shoots first, the world will be a lot better place once Israel is toast. Too bad Israeli citizens won't take action to prevent destruction at the hands of their own leadership like citizens of many other countries in the MidEast have done.

[ant1999e]

Originally Posted by Boomhauer

Israel has long declared they'll launch preeminent attacks against Iran because Iran doesn't like them. Would Iran be more justified in launching preeminent attacks against Israel for their declaration of intended war?

Despite who shoots first, the world will be a lot better place once Israel is toast. Too bad Israeli citizens won't take action to prevent destruction at the hands of their own leadership like citizens of many other countries in the MidEast have done.

I don't remember Israel threatening to wipe Iran off the face of the earth like Iran has threatened to do to Israel.
The world will be a better place once Israel is toast? Wow!

[epicSocialism4tw]

Israel should destroy every nuclear and military installation in Iran.

And then they should leave a horse head in the bed of Achmadinejad.

[ant1999e]

Originally Posted by epicSocialism4tw

Israel should destroy every nuclear and military instillation in Iran.

And then they should leave a horse head in the bed of Achmadinejad.

Or they could just take akmed jed's head.

[Boomhauer]

Originally Posted by epicSocialism4tw

Israel should destroy every nuclear and military installation in Iran. ...

Should the US, likewise, destroy every nuclear and military installation in Israel? Likewise- fence in, starve, arrest-torture-execute Israeli citizens, then fire burning phosphate at them and use their children to set off mines during 'pacification' exercises. Likewise- roll tanks through Israel and declare the land a foreign country, then start building on what land wasn't taken and declare that foreign territory as well.

... or do the methods and rules Israel uses not apply against them ...

[Spider]

Originally Posted by epicSocialism4tw

Israel should destroy every nuclear and military installation in Iran.

And then they should leave a horse head in the bed of Achmadinejad.

Take your meds ......... your starting to blather

[mhgaffney]

Originally Posted by epicSocialism4tw

Israel should destroy every nuclear and military installation in Iran.

And then they should leave a horse head in the bed of Achmadinejad.

This clown Epic calls himself a Christian. What a bat crazy fool his is. Like so many fundamentalists.

Epic has more in common with the fanatical Jidahists than with any genuine Christian.

[mhgaffney]

Originally Posted by Boomhauer

Should the US, likewise, destroy every nuclear and military installation in Israel? Likewise- fence in, starve, arrest-torture-execute Israeli citizens, then fire burning phosphate at them and use their children to set off mines during 'pacification' exercises. Likewise- roll tanks through Israel and declare the land a foreign country, then start building on what land wasn't taken and declare that foreign territory as well.

... or do the methods and rules Israel uses not apply against them ...

It's a double standard. Israel gets away with murder on a regular basis. But point it out -- and you are tarred and feathered with the anti semite nonsense...

[cutthemdown]

So Gaff are you saying Obamas October surprise will be a September war? That is crazy talk. Israel wouldn't want to tangle with Iran unless they had no choice. So many would die, that would be crazy.

[mhgaffney]

I agree Cut. But if the economy tanks real bad -- later this summer-fall -- they may have no option but to distract us with another war.

Either another war or another 9/11.

This is the pattern of history.