The Truth, Still Inconvenient

[W*GS]

Krugman nails it again. The deniers are losing. Of course.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/04/op...04krugman.html

[Dukes]

This issue has warped your mind.

[DBruleU]

Originally Posted by W*GS

Krugman nails it again. The deniers are losing. Of course.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/04/op...04krugman.html

Well, the truth sure is inconvenient.

[Obushma]

Krugman is a failure, Keynesian economics has created this mess. Krugman runs and hides like a p***Y when faced with an Austrian.

[W*GS]

The irony, as Krugman points out, is that the deniers pinned their hopes that BEST would show NASA/NOAA/JMA/etc. wrong and that manmade climate change was a hoax.

Too bad, boys - the data is what it is, and the real politically-based manipulation is all on the denier side. Wadda shocker.

[Obushma]

Originally Posted by W*GS

The irony, as Krugman points out, is that the deniers pinned their hopes that BEST would show NASA/NOAA/JMA/etc. wrong and that manmade climate change was a hoax.

Too bad, boys - the data is what it is, and the real politically-based manipulation is all on the denier side. Wadda shocker.

Data manipulation, no doubt you wallow in it W*gs.

[W*GS]

Originally Posted by Obushma

Data manipulation, no doubt you wallow in it W*gs.

Muller is already being thrown under the bus by the usual suspects. It's your side that lacks integrity and honesty - obviously.

Deniers have never cared about the science at all.

[Obushma]

Originally Posted by W*GS

Muller is already being thrown under the bus by the usual suspects. It's your side that lacks integrity and honesty - obviously.

Deniers have never cared about the science at all.

It's not a side I take W*gs but the truth.

I don't disagree that man has created pollution on the planet, I disagree with the carbon tax credit plan you and other globalists have come up with.

As we move forward into the future, and most of the world resources are owned, it only makes sense that globalists find a new "mythological" resource to exploit against the population of the world.

[DBruleU]

Originally Posted by W*GS

Muller is already being thrown under the bus by the usual suspects. It's your side that lacks integrity and honesty - obviously.

Deniers have never cared about the science at all.

Would that be the science that was found to be fraudulant?

No one disagress with taking care of the planet. But to the degree you'd like us to go is where you lose the majority of people.

[Arkie]

There's nothing we can do to stop the climate cycle.

[Dukes]

Originally Posted by Arkie

There's nothing we can do to stop the climate cycle.

That won't stop the government from trying to profit from it.

[cutthemdown]

I could care less if Earth is warming or cooling. Either way we have to adapt. Either way it can't be stopped if it is manmade. That is unless you want to go kill people all over the world to reduce the amount of humans. No takers? ok then deal with it.

[W*GS]

Originally Posted by Obushma

It's not a side I take W*gs but the truth.

I don't disagree that man has created pollution on the planet, I disagree with the carbon tax credit plan you and other globalists have come up with.

Then your problem is with a potential policy, not the science.

[W*GS]

Originally Posted by DBruleU

Would that be the science that was found to be fraudulant?

Which science, and it was found "fraudulant" by whom?

Details, please.

Originally Posted by DBruleU

No one disagress with taking care of the planet. But to the degree you'd like us to go is where you lose the majority of people.

Just like Obushma - your problem is with policy, not the science.

[W*GS]

Originally Posted by Arkie

There's nothing we can do to stop the climate cycle.

Why are some people so fatalistic? We're causing the problem - but we're helpless to stop it? Why?

[W*GS]

Originally Posted by cutthemdown

I could care less if Earth is warming or cooling. Either way we have to adapt. Either way it can't be stopped if it is manmade. That is unless you want to go kill people all over the world to reduce the amount of humans. No takers? ok then deal with it.

Why do you suggest genocide? Are we no smarter than that?

[Dukes]

Originally Posted by W*GS

Which science, and it was found "fraudulant" by whom?

Details, please.



Just like Obushma - your problem is with policy, not the science.

Probably because politicians are hijacking the science for their political gain

[Garcia Bronco]

Originally Posted by W*GS

Then your problem is with a potential policy, not the science.

There you ho again; Which "science" would that be?

[Obushma]

Originally Posted by W*GS

Then your problem is with a potential policy, not the science.

I don't agree with a economic globalist like Krugman, so I doubt I believe the "data" your globalist scientists bring to the table either.

[Dr. Broncenstein]

[W*GS]

Originally Posted by Dukes

Probably because politicians are hijacking the science for their political gain

Politicians like the GOP?

Change "hijacking" to "denying", and you're entirely correct.

[W*GS]

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco

There you ho again; Which "science" would that be?

Little things like physics, chemistry, you know.

[W*GS]

Originally Posted by Obushma

I don't agree with a economic globalist like Krugman, so I doubt I believe the "data" your globalist scientists bring to the table either.

I see. Krugman is just reporting on the latest attempt to show that manmade climate change is some sort of fraud or hoax is blowing up in the deniers' faces; as expected, the science is sound.

Whether you believe in it or not. Sorta like gravity.

[W*GS]

Originally Posted by Dr. Broncenstein

[...]

Cartoons are great for kids.

Check out Peter Sinclair's series "Climate Denial Crock of the Week" on YouTube.

[Arkie]

Originally Posted by W*GS

Why are some people so fatalistic? We're causing the problem - but we're helpless to stop it? Why?

The sun is responsible for global warming. Our SUVs and light bulbs play a tiny role, but this trend would have happened regardless of humans, and when the trend reverses, there's nothing we can do to stop the cooling. Are we responsible for the recent global warming on Mars too?