Parent of Choice inspired by Orangeandblueblooded's Pwnfest Thread

[OABB]

Originally Posted by sakuraba

wow, just wow,. This has become the last thread...again. W*gs I believe this is really just about a preference question. Not who is more fit but who is preferred. That is what the question is. It says that the couples are equal in all things but sexual orientation. So where is the oppression of gays.

It just won't sink in....

He's got to be brilliant or insane.

It so wierd.

He just is incapable of seeing reality.

I hear the psycho string play when he posts.

We have all tried so hard to explain that is is about preference.

I have explained it and you all have explained it REPEAtEDLY!

He just ignores it.

It's so bizzare.


I don't get how anyone can be so absurd!

[sakuraba]

it's got electrolytes

[OABB]

Originally Posted by underrated29

I would not go as far as to say that the people here want to persecute gays for raising kids. Now I may not know them as well as you do, but I am pretty sure they are not standing in line now ready to persecute or form hunting parties like the salem which things and try to find gay parents.


It seems to me that it is majority peoples preference to have hetero over homo. But I doubt that anyone would say no parents is better than gay parents.

Dude...
You don't understand how nuts wags is.

There is a 4o page thread that blue just locked where this was explained like a hundred times.

He really may be insane. I'm not joking either.

I mean it's so obvious what we are saying right?


It's because I used slurs that he can't listen to the point.

He's that sensitive and gay.

[W*GS]

Originally Posted by OABB

I'm back to my original theory that you purposely are ignoring my point just to piss me off.

My theory is that you hate gays.

If you weren't so stupid as to use anti-gays slurs, in volume, then my view would have much less support.

But, since you were so kind as to betray your views with every slur, my opinion of you is proven correct.

You need to engage brain (weak and flawed as it is) before fingers hit keyboard. It might make showing that you're an idiot and a fool a wee bit more difficult.

Basically, you cut yourself off at the knees, on purpose, and then tried to play pro basketball. Quite stupid on your part.

I rather doubt the lesson has been learned, however.

[TheReverend]

Originally Posted by W*GS

My theory is that you hate gays.

If you weren't so stupid as to use anti-gays slurs, in volume, then my view would have much less support.

But, since you were so kind as to betray your views with every slur, my opinion of you is proven correct.

You need to engage brain (weak and flawed as it is) before fingers hit keyboard. It might make showing that you're an idiot and a fool a wee bit more difficult.

Basically, you cut yourself off at the knees, on purpose, and then tried to play pro basketball. Quite stupid on your part.

I rather doubt the lesson has been learned, however.

That's fine, but why do you feel the need to inject that theory into the very different discussion going on?

[W*GS]

Originally Posted by underrated29

I would not go as far as to say that the people here want to persecute gays for raising kids.

oabb's choice to use slurs, and his adoring fanboy's refusal to call him on his choice, speaks volumes.

Gays aren't human beings, in their sick and pathetic little minds.

Why defend such scum?

[TheReverend]

Originally Posted by W*GS

oabb's choice to use slurs, and his adoring fanboy's refusal to call him on his choice, speaks volumes.

Gays aren't human beings, in their sick and pathetic little minds.

Why defend such scum?

Are you including me? Because I've said several times my personal stance is very pro gay rights.

[OABB]

Originally Posted by W*GS

My theory is that you hate gays.

If you weren't so stupid as to use anti-gays slurs, in volume, then my view would have much less support.

But, since you were so kind as to betray your views with every slur, my opinion of you is proven correct.

You need to engage brain (weak and flawed as it is) before fingers hit keyboard. It might make showing that you're an idiot and a fool a wee bit more difficult.

Basically, you cut yourself off at the knees, on purpose, and then tried to play pro basketball. Quite stupid on your part.

I rather doubt the lesson has been learned, however.

fine. I don't have a problem with any of this.

I just want to know why you ignore what I actually say?

Would the point have gotten to you if I didn't slur?

[W*GS]

Originally Posted by TheReverend

That's fine, but why do you feel the need to inject that theory into the very different discussion going on?

The "very different" is based on the concept that gays are less-fit parents than heterosexuals.

The poll itself is based on the same idiocy - that gays are only worthy of hate.

I've noted that no-one has condemned anti-gay hate crimes, like the murder of Matthew Shepard. It's quite telling.

[That One Guy]

Originally Posted by TheReverend

That's fine, but why do you feel the need to inject that theory into the very different discussion going on?

That's exactly what I thought of when I read that.

It'd be like walking up on stage while someone's singing and busting into a different song. Next time someone sings a church hymn, I'm gonna bust into "Pretty fly for a white guy" just to see what W*GS gets out of it.

[OABB]

I mean if I said it like this:


All things being equal, I think it's best for a kid to have a mom and a dad instead of a gay couple.

And I'm not saying gay couples aren't wonderful parents, it's just not my preference, and I believe whole heardetly, not the preference of a child.

How about that wags?

[TheReverend]

Originally Posted by W*GS

The "very different" is based on the concept that gays are less-fit parents than heterosexuals.

The poll itself is based on the same idiocy - that gays are only worthy of hate.

I've noted that no-one has condemned anti-gay hate crimes, like the murder of Matthew Shepard. It's quite telling.

Not knocking you, but how in god's name did you possibly take that away from the poll options and original post?!

[That One Guy]

Originally Posted by W*GS

The "very different" is based on the concept that gays are less-fit parents than heterosexuals.

The poll itself is based on the same idiocy - that gays are only worthy of hate.

I've noted that no-one has condemned anti-gay hate crimes, like the murder of Matthew Shepard. It's quite telling.

Nor have we spoken on the tendency of Paris Hilton and Lindsey Lohan to avoid jailtime for criminal behavior. What's that have to do with gay parents?

[OABB]

Originally Posted by That One Guy

That's exactly what I thought of when I read that.

It'd be like walking up on stage while someone's singing and busting into a different song. Next time someone sings a church hymn, I'm gonna bust into "Pretty fly for a white guy" just to see what W*GS gets out of it.

I think my slurs cracked his brain.
I had no idea i had that kind of power.
But I literally think his brain is broken.

[W*GS]

Originally Posted by TheReverend

Not knocking you, but how in god's name did you possibly take that away from the poll options and original post?!

What does a parent's sexuality have to do with fitness as a parent?

Explain.

[W*GS]

Originally Posted by OABB

I think my slurs cracked his brain.
I had no idea i had that kind of power.
But I literally think his brain is broken.

The only things cracked here are your weak attempts at backpedaling and rationalizations.

Why do you hate homosexuals?

[That One Guy]

Originally Posted by W*GS

What does a parent's sexuality have to do with fitness as a parent?

Explain.

In the fantasy world you live in, do you think a child would never face the question from his friends, "Billy, why do you have two dads?"

How about in the real world?

[W*GS]

Originally Posted by That One Guy

Next time someone sings a church hymn, I'm gonna bust into "Pretty fly for a white guy" just to see what W*GS gets out of it.

Why would I be in a church? I'm an atheist.

[TheReverend]

Originally Posted by W*GS

What does a parent's sexuality have to do with fitness as a parent?

Explain.

Sure, but you didn't answer my question.

Once again, I have no problem with gay adoption. That being said, I DO think all things being equal it would be better for kids to be raised by a heterosexual couple so they wouldn't grow up experiencing blurred gender roles.

Is that antiquated? Possibly, but it's my opinion. Side note: I hope every healthy gay couple goes an adopts a kid.

[W*GS]

Originally Posted by That One Guy

In the fantasy world you live in, do you think a child would never face the question from his friends, "Billy, why do you have two dads?"

How about in the real world?

In the real world, families are made up of much more than just Mr. and Mrs. John Doe.

Ponder that.

[W*GS]

Originally Posted by TheReverend

Once again, I have no problem with gay adoption. That being said, I DO think all things being equal it would be better for kids to be raised by a heterosexual couple so they wouldn't grow up experiencing blurred gender roles.

The "blurred" part is only because you insist that males do Y and females do X.

Get past that ****.

[Inquisitive Encyclopedic Insomniac]

Originally Posted by NUB

How about this question:

Two identical couples in every way except their skin color: Your preference for the kid,

White or black.

Interesting question. I don't really see skin color as any issue. Actually I'm not against gays either I just wanted the actual conversation to be had.

If I was picking I probably would choose black couple.

[OABB]

freud.jpg

"Holy ****! Theece Vags guy is really cooked!"

[TheReverend]

Originally Posted by W*GS

The "blurred" part is only because you insist that males do Y and females do X.

Get past that ****.

Did you not read the part where I admitted it's antiquated?

And you still haven't the question. Why do you keep dodging questions when it relates to the actual topic? Instead you just fashion yourself some crusader for gay rights. Guess what bro? They're fine and don't you.

Now please answer my question.

[Inquisitive Encyclopedic Insomniac]

Originally Posted by underrated29

Prefer- male/female

However, with so many kids up for adoption and kids who have no parents and potentially no future. I would say any couple willing to take them in and provide them a future and not just use them for tax breaks and such, would be a winner in my book.


So looks like this

male/femal>homo>no parents

See now we are getting some place. Actual answers and discussion!!! Thank you

Mine would look more like male/female>same sex couple>single parent>no parent