![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Seasoned Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 370
Adopt-a-Bronco: Lyle Alzado |
It was a horse**** call. It cost the Broncos a chance to go up 14-3 in the 3rd. What are the chances the Broncos get an apology this week from the NFL league office?
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Ask me about my title
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,849
Adopt-a-Bronco: Von Miller |
It did contribute to my new avatar, and that's pretty awesome.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Zombie Slayer
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 5,249
Adopt-a-Bronco: Von Miller |
about the same as our chances of getting McD to apologize for putting an offense out there that goes 3 and out too often
I hated the call also, but it should have been at least 14-3 at that point anyhow |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: colorado springs, co
Posts: 22,575
|
it's too bad the broncos had no chance to win the game after that play.
oh wait.... |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 12,559
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
that play was a game changer, such a huge play that should hvae never been penalized. refs definitely werent on our side this game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
I'm all up in your face
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Omaha
Posts: 12,405
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
Why would the refs say sorry for making the correct call? Do you guys understand the rules? This isn't a new one...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 678
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Groovy Baby
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: West side of Michigan
Posts: 236
|
Isn't a chop block where a second offensive player goes low on a a guy that is already engaged with another blocker? That guy sure wasn't engaged when he ran over Moreno laying on the ground.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
I'm all up in your face
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Omaha
Posts: 12,405
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
Quote:
To be clear, it is also against the rules if both blockers hit the defender at the same time. It doesn't matter how it happens, you can't block high and low on a defender. Last edited by jhns; 11-01-2010 at 11:10 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Seasoned Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 370
Adopt-a-Bronco: Lyle Alzado |
Hochstein didn't even make an attempt to block the rusher. Hochstein was thrown into the rusher.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
It is what it Is.
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 53,817
Adopt-a-Bronco: Buy My Book |
You could probably call that same call a bunch of times during the game. It was a call that shouldn't have been made.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
I'm all up in your face
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Omaha
Posts: 12,405
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Hokie since 1993
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 45,991
Adopt-a-Bronco: Tom Jackson |
It was a bull**** call.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 12,559
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
I'm all up in your face
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Omaha
Posts: 12,405
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
Anti-bronco agenda? I am one of the few that has been wanting what is best for this team. It is you Raider fans that have been happy about the direction of this team. Don't worry, I don't fault you for it. I always hope the Raiders go down this path. It is how fans of division rivals work.
Last edited by jhns; 11-01-2010 at 11:29 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 7,365
Adopt-a-Bronco: Chris Harris |
It was a bad call. It was not a correct call at all. The rule is that 2 blockers cannot enguage the defender (one high and one low). Moreno was not enguaging at all. He simply fell to the ground and did not attempt to go make a block at all. It's not his fualt some stupid DL ran his way and fell over him. So the OL for Denver just touches the guy and Moreno in no way was even attempting to block the guy. That was not a chop block. It was a F'd up call and the refs a ****ING IDIOT. We all know what a real chop block is and why that rule was put in there. This was NOT a ****in chop block and trust me, the lead NFL rules guy knows this. The Broncos simply got F'd on this one.
Last edited by ZONA; 11-01-2010 at 11:39 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
I'm all up in your face
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Omaha
Posts: 12,405
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 683
|
Quote:
Yeah, as much as it sucks, the rule is not about intent, only about what happens on the field. If the rules were called based on intent, 80% of all facemask calls would be nullified. Moreno did not mean to engage the defender, hell he was honestly just trying to get out of the way. He just happened to fall at the guys legs, while Hocstien engaged him high. No, it was not intentional. Doesn't matter. The rule is pretty clear. Now, you could argue that it feels like that is the sort of call that is only going against us right now and never be called on the other team. But, by the strict interpretation of the rules, it was the correct call. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 7,365
Adopt-a-Bronco: Chris Harris |
Why don't you post up the rule then. Because I don't think it says anything about a player laying on the ground as being a blocker.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
aka mav_7. who?
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: VA (heart is in TX)
Posts: 3,444
|
Moreno looked at the defender (and saw him coming) just before performing the flea flicker. Immediately after he intentionally went down to block the incoming defender. Hochstein was pushed into the same defender and barely touched the guy. It was a BS call and overall, if someone were to sit down and watch gamefilm from the past 10 years, would see that we get some of the most retarded calls against the team. Who knows, maybe it's just me being a crybaby. Ha
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 7,365
Adopt-a-Bronco: Chris Harris |
I guess if you are laying down 3/4's of the way, not looking at the defender, back is facing the defender, you are still considerd to be "blocking" that guy. What a bunch of horse ****. And yes, Hoch was shoved into him. We need these refs to use just a tad of discretion don't ya think. There is hardly ever anything so black and white, there is usually some degree of grey and the refs need to actually SEE what the **** they are looking at and interpret. Could they call holding on almost every play, sure, but the NFL says don't do that, use your judgement. Well obviously this is something they should have done here. I doubt all refs today would have called that penalty. Just this stupid MF'er who can't think right.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
I'm all up in your face
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Omaha
Posts: 12,405
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
Looking at that rule won't help you then. You need to look up what a block is. An offensive player getting in the way and stopping progress of a defensive player, is a block. Moreno didn't go to the defenders legs for no reason. This is a common block from RBs.
Last edited by jhns; 11-01-2010 at 12:35 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: London, ON
Posts: 10,021
Adopt-a-Bronco: Spencer Larsen |
That was a bull**** call to some extend, but it was also extremely poor judgement by Hochstein, who should never have blocked the guy in the back. If he just keeps his hands to himself, that is a TD.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Faneco this...
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: California
Posts: 6,302
Adopt-a-Bronco: ERIC DECKER |
I absolutely agree. The refs ****ed us numerous times yesterday. I want to find that ref and kick the **** out of him I am so pissed
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
TEAM FIRST.
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 29,785
|
Quote:
I don't claim to know the rule, but I thought if this was at the LOS, it had to involve 2 players to be called? |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| NFL must audible PI rule | Goobzilla | Orange Mane Central Discussion | 53 | 10-21-2010 09:14 AM |
| SC Justice Antonin Scalia says Death Penalty for Innocent Man is Perfectly Fine | footstepsfrom#27 | War, Religion and Politics Thread | 32 | 08-20-2009 11:16 PM |
| Choose a Candidate... | TheDave | War, Religion and Politics Thread | 43 | 10-13-2007 10:09 AM |
| New Jersey Legislature Suspends Death Penalty | Bronco_Beerslug | War, Religion and Politics Thread | 0 | 01-10-2006 05:02 AM |
| Flea flicker or Boot leg? | DBroncos4life | Orange Mane Central Discussion | 10 | 12-12-2005 04:35 AM |