peter king predicts top 35 pick for marshall - The Orange Mane

tsiguy96 · 04-13-2010, 04:16 PM

its a bidding war and i bet the best one wins...

Quote:

GM with WR need (but not interested in Marshall) just told me he now feels Den will get top-35 pick for him in trade. Higher that I thought.

Hercules Rockefeller · 04-13-2010, 04:18 PM

Rams at #33 or Bucs at #35 then

BroncoInferno · 04-13-2010, 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hercules Rockefeller

Rams at #33 or Bucs at #35 then

Rams at #33 would be a great position to be in. Would have all night to field offers from teams looking to move up.

mhgaffney · 04-13-2010, 04:25 PM

33 would be like wow.

Dagmar · 04-13-2010, 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hercules Rockefeller

Rams at #33 or Bucs at #35 then

That would be good. Neither of those teams are going to be contenders this year. Rams please!

God move for the Rams too, Bradford Marshall and Jackson is pretty good...

Harvitz81 · 04-13-2010, 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BroncoInferno

Rams at #33 would be a great position to be in. Would have all night to field offers from teams looking to move up.

This. The 33rd pick is worth so much more as teams will go over their boards after rd 1 and you can bet that someone will be willing to pay a kings ransom for this pick to get that player that dropped out of the first round.

Might be able to trade down about 10 picks and pick up an additional 3rd or a 2nd from next year.

Popps · 04-13-2010, 04:33 PM

33 would be nice. Great value, low paycheck.

Chris · 04-13-2010, 04:42 PM

Who do you think we would draft at 33? As far as top OL prospects go I'm guessing Pouncey and Iupati are gone by then.

Swedish Extrovert · 04-13-2010, 04:45 PM

**** that. Keep him in Denver. This is not going to be pretty.

DenverBrit · 04-13-2010, 04:47 PM

Does SF have two firsts??

Mr.Meanie · 04-13-2010, 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DenverBrit

Does SF have two firsts??

Yes.

BMarsh, Crabtree and Vernon Davis would be really, really fun to watch. I imagine the 49ers are thinking so too. I can easily see them trading us #17.

HAT · 04-13-2010, 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dagmar

That would be good. Neither of those teams are going to be contenders this year. Rams please!

God move for the Rams too, Bradford Marshall and Jackson is pretty good...

Bucs @ 35 more likely IMO. They have two seconds. I still think there's an outside shot that The Rams go Suh with #1 with the idea of taking McCoy @ #33.

As mentioned....33 would be a great pick to own though with the new format this year.

Baba Booey · 04-13-2010, 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DenverBrit

Does SF have two firsts??

Would they want two headcases at WR though?

Marshall would probably b**** about not being able to get #15 from Crabtree.

That said, I'd love to trade him to SF for a first if they'll bite.

SoDak Bronco · 04-13-2010, 05:02 PM

this is great news...hopefully we can get the seahawks to give up #14 or else they won't be sniffing marshall.

DenverBrit · 04-13-2010, 05:04 PM

With the tender signed, it makes sense to look at those teams holding two firsts as possible trade partners.

Seattle might still provide laughs by trading back the first they got from Denver last year.

Traveler · 04-13-2010, 07:11 PM

While the jury is still out on the Alphonso Smith trade, Xanders/ JMFMcD have done a pretty nice job of getting value for the trades they have made.

If BM is traded, let see if the trend continues.

Broncoman13 · 04-13-2010, 07:18 PM

I wonder if the Rams would be interested in giving up Carriker and a pick?

Caligula · 04-13-2010, 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Broncoman13

I wonder if the Rams would be interested in giving up Carriker and a pick?

why? When they can get him for a pick?

Broncoman13 · 04-13-2010, 07:32 PM

B/c a team could come in and offer a low first and get ahead of them... they may want to sweeten the pot, and honestly... I'd prefer the #33 and a player to a low first.

Possibilities at #33...
Pouncey, Tate, Odrick, Benn, Iupati, Lee, Weatherspoon, Saffold, Mays, Dunlap, Dan Williams, and then a handful of CBs. Yes, I know that a lot of these guys are projected as first round picks, but there is a very good chance that a few or even several of them slip out of the first round.

If you were able to get a starting LDT/DE to go along with that pick it would go a long way toward freeing you up at #11, 33, and 45.

You could pretty much go BPA at #11, C/OG at 33, and BPA again at 45 (I hope it's Sean Lee).

DBroncos4life · 04-13-2010, 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Broncoman13

I wonder if the Rams would be interested in giving up Carriker and a pick?

I hope so.

Caligula · 04-13-2010, 07:34 PM

Let me clarify. Why would the Rams offer up the best pick in the 2nd round, AND a player when they don't need to?

gyldenlove · 04-13-2010, 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Traveler

While the jury is still out on the Alphonso Smith trade, Xanders/ JMFMcD have done a pretty nice job of getting value for the trades they have made.

If BM is traded, let see if the trend continues.

Not really.

The Smith trade was bad, the Quinn trade was bad, the Lekevin trade was bad, the Hochstein trade didn't yield much, the Brandstater trade isn't looking amazing right now.

Aside from the Cutler trade and potentially the Brady Quinn trade I would say that duo is batting pretty poorly when it comes to getting value.

gtown · 04-13-2010, 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Caligula

Let me clarify. Why would the Rams offer up the best pick in the 2nd round, AND a player when they don't need to?

Maybe the Rams don't want to gamble with any of the WRs in the draft when they can simply trade a second and a player for a proven Pro Bowl WR. What better to go with a shiny new franchise QB then a proven guy who won't have a steep learning curve.

Broncoman13 · 04-13-2010, 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Caligula

Let me clarify. Why would the Rams offer up the best pick in the 2nd round, AND a player when they don't need to?

Why don't they need to?

Bigdawg26 · 04-13-2010, 07:54 PM

Man I hope we do instead of that 60th pick. Under 35th pick would be pretty sweet to get a guy like Pouncey, Benn (who I would love to get), or another G/C

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

04-13-2010, 04:18 PM	#2
Hercules Rockefeller Ring of Famer Join Date: May 2001 Posts: 16,013 Adopt-a-Bronco: DJ Williams	Rams at #33 or Bucs at #35 then

04-13-2010, 04:25 PM	#4
mhgaffney Ring of Famer Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 9,845	33 would be like wow.

04-13-2010, 04:33 PM	#7
Popps TEAM FIRST. Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Los Angeles, CA Posts: 29,792	33 would be nice. Great value, low paycheck.

04-13-2010, 04:42 PM	#8
Chris Millenium Scrooge McDuck Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 7,541 Adopt-a-Bronco: OrlandoFranklin	Who do you think we would draft at 33? As far as top OL prospects go I'm guessing Pouncey and Iupati are gone by then.

04-13-2010, 04:45 PM	#9
Swedish Extrovert President of the Universe Formerly known as mightysmurf Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Highlands Ranch Posts: 15,118 Adopt-a-Bronco: Joel Dreesen	**** that. Keep him in Denver. This is not going to be pretty.

04-13-2010, 04:47 PM	#10
DenverBrit Just hanging out. Got a breath mint?? Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Denver Posts: 11,116 Adopt-a-Bronco: The Team	Does SF have two firsts??

04-13-2010, 05:02 PM	#14
SoDak Bronco Lace em' up and lets go!! Von Miller aka QB Killa Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: South Dakota Posts: 4,133 Adopt-a-Bronco: Robert Ayers	this is great news...hopefully we can get the seahawks to give up #14 or else they won't be sniffing marshall.

04-13-2010, 05:04 PM	#15
DenverBrit Just hanging out. Got a breath mint?? Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Denver Posts: 11,116 Adopt-a-Bronco: The Team	With the tender signed, it makes sense to look at those teams holding two firsts as possible trade partners. Seattle might still provide laughs by trading back the first they got from Denver last year.

04-13-2010, 07:11 PM	#16
Traveler Traveling Man! Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Atlanta, GA Posts: 4,417 Adopt-a-Bronco: Ryan Clady	While the jury is still out on the Alphonso Smith trade, Xanders/ JMFMcD have done a pretty nice job of getting value for the trades they have made. If BM is traded, let see if the trend continues.

04-13-2010, 07:18 PM	#17
Broncoman13 Broncoholic JT #80 Join Date: May 2001 Location: Colorado Posts: 16,962 Adopt-a-Bronco: Orange Julius	I wonder if the Rams would be interested in giving up Carriker and a pick?

04-13-2010, 07:32 PM	#19
Broncoman13 Broncoholic JT #80 Join Date: May 2001 Location: Colorado Posts: 16,962 Adopt-a-Bronco: Orange Julius	B/c a team could come in and offer a low first and get ahead of them... they may want to sweeten the pot, and honestly... I'd prefer the #33 and a player to a low first. Possibilities at #33... Pouncey, Tate, Odrick, Benn, Iupati, Lee, Weatherspoon, Saffold, Mays, Dunlap, Dan Williams, and then a handful of CBs. Yes, I know that a lot of these guys are projected as first round picks, but there is a very good chance that a few or even several of them slip out of the first round. If you were able to get a starting LDT/DE to go along with that pick it would go a long way toward freeing you up at #11, 33, and 45. You could pretty much go BPA at #11, C/OG at 33, and BPA again at 45 (I hope it's Sean Lee).

04-13-2010, 07:34 PM	#21
Caligula Seasoned Veteran New to the Forum Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 269 Adopt-a-Bronco: None	Let me clarify. Why would the Rams offer up the best pick in the 2nd round, AND a player when they don't need to?

04-13-2010, 07:54 PM	#25
Bigdawg26 Ring of Famer New to the Forum Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 1,481 Adopt-a-Bronco: None	Man I hope we do instead of that 60th pick. Under 35th pick would be pretty sweet to get a guy like Pouncey, Benn (who I would love to get), or another G/C