The Orange Mane -  a Denver Broncos Fan Community  

Go Back   The Orange Mane - a Denver Broncos Fan Community > Orange Mane Discussion > Orange Mane Central Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Chat Room Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-19-2010, 10:49 AM   #1
Natedogg
1st Amendment Protection
 
Natedogg's Avatar
 
You givin' me a ride home Russell??

Join Date: May 2005
Location: Narcville, USA
Posts: 2,099

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Travis Henry
Default OT Document Friday: The Cuban Missile Crisis Part Two. New Evidence on the Danger.

Here's this week's post I wrote for my job at the National Security Archive. Its a rundown about the new evidence we have about the Cuban Missile Crisis. Some is pretty scary.

Here's a snippet; documents proving the assertions are available at the actual site.

http://nsarchive.wordpress.com/2010/...to-khrushchev/

But other recent evidence shows that the Cuban Missile Crisis was even more dangerous than Kennedy and Khrushchev perceived at the time:

* Despite detecting some nuclear weapons in Cuba, US intelligence was dangerously incorrect in other facets. In addition to mistakenly reporting the presence of Chinese troops on Cuba, Secretary of Defense McNamara reported to the President that there were 6,000 to 8,000 Soviet “technicians” on the island rather than the actual 43,000 armed combat troops. Some of these troops, we now know, were within fifteen miles of Guantanamo Bay and were armed with nuclear cruise missiles which could have obliterated the US base within minutes.
* Fidel Castro was ready to sacrifice his country to nuclear war to promote the socialist cause. In a 26 October 1962 letter to Khrushchev, he wrote that if the imperialist United States “manage[ed] to carry out an invasion of Cuba…then that would be the moment to eliminate this danger forever, in an act of the most legitimate self-defense [read: nuclear war].” Castro’s zeal likely contributed to Khrushchev’s decision to remove the nuclear weapons from Cuba.
* American U2 planes escalated the crisis. On 27 October 1962, Cuban and Soviet troops shot down an American U2 over Cuban airspace because they feared it could uncover the position of the Soviet nuclear cruise missiles near Guantanamo Bay; Maj. Rudolf Anderson was killed. That same day, a U2 piloted by Captain Charles Maultsby flew into Soviet airspace, ran out of fuel, and glided home to Alaska. Khrushchev asked Kennedy in his 28 October 1962 letter, “Is it not a fact that an intruding American plane could be easily taken for a nuclear bomber, which might push us to a fateful step?”
* And most shockingly, hours after the U2 plane was shot down over Cuba, the US Navy used grenade-sized depth charges to force a Soviet submarine armed with a nuclear torpedo to surface in the Caribbean. One sailor has controversially claimed that the captain of the sub became enraged, ordered the nuclear torpedo armed, and yelled, “We’re going to blast them now! We will die, but we will sink them all.” Fortunately, cooler heads prevailed. According to Robert Kennedy, when McNamara informed the President that depth charges had been used on Soviet submarines, “those few minutes were the time of greatest worry to the President. His hand went up to his face & covered his mouth and he closed his fist.”

http://nsarchive.wordpress.com/2010/...to-khrushchev/

Let me know what you think.

Last edited by Natedogg; 02-19-2010 at 11:37 AM..
Natedogg is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 02-19-2010, 11:01 AM   #2
Archer81
Optimum Homo
 
Archer81's Avatar
 
Tactical Neck.

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 22,377
Default

Dammit...I knew 13 days with Kevin Costner was too good to be true...


Archer81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2010, 11:02 AM   #3
Natedogg
1st Amendment Protection
 
Natedogg's Avatar
 
You givin' me a ride home Russell??

Join Date: May 2005
Location: Narcville, USA
Posts: 2,099

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Travis Henry
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sirhcyennek81 View Post
Dammit...I knew 13 days with Kevin Costner was too good to be true...


Yeah, sorry to ruin it, but the whole climax part about the sov ships turning back at the lasts second before the blockade never happened. Funny how things get remembered.
Natedogg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2010, 11:16 AM   #4
colonelbeef
Lets be friend
 
colonelbeef's Avatar
 
Elway is the new Jerry West

Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 3,876

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Derek Wolfe
Default

Even if correct, none of these countries have been or are of any real threat to the sovereignty of the USA. Those days died when Nazi Germany decided to go after the USSR instead of holding tight with their European and African claims.
colonelbeef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2010, 11:22 AM   #5
Natedogg
1st Amendment Protection
 
Natedogg's Avatar
 
You givin' me a ride home Russell??

Join Date: May 2005
Location: Narcville, USA
Posts: 2,099

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Travis Henry
Default

The Soviets could have destroyed the USA with nuclear weapons (even by accident). The Nazis could not. Its doubtful the Nazis could have even crossed the Atlantic. They couldn't even cross the English Channel.

And I am almost completely certain that everything in my post is correct (check the links documenting my assertions). If you find anything specific I wrote that you don't think is true, let me know.
Natedogg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2010, 12:26 PM   #6
WolfpackGuy
Call me, "Maybe"
 
WolfpackGuy's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Delaware
Posts: 6,788
Default

They should've rooted out Castro long before 1962.

The amazing thing is the old fart's still alive!
WolfpackGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2010, 01:36 PM   #7
Archer81
Optimum Homo
 
Archer81's Avatar
 
Tactical Neck.

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 22,377
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Natedogg View Post
The Soviets could have destroyed the USA with nuclear weapons (even by accident). The Nazis could not. Its doubtful the Nazis could have even crossed the Atlantic. They couldn't even cross the English Channel.
And I am almost completely certain that everything in my post is correct (check the links documenting my assertions). If you find anything specific I wrote that you don't think is true, let me know.

That was in 1941. If the Nazis win in Europe and either conquer England or get them to surrender, the British navy ends up in Nazi hands, and with no one to oppose them from Gibraltar to Siberia, the construction of a blue water navy would have happened.

But this is the assumption Hitler would have wanted to conquer the Americas; it would have been doubtful he pushes for war in the Western hemisphere in his lifetime.

Archer81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2010, 05:37 PM   #8
loborugger
lost in the ether
 
loborugger's Avatar
 
Did we finally get a FB???

Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The 'cuse
Posts: 5,714

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Peyton Hillis
Default

Fidel Castro was ready to sacrifice his country to nuclear war to promote the socialist cause.

loborugger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2010, 06:43 PM   #9
SoCalBronco
Nixonite
 
SoCalBronco's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Arcadia, CA
Posts: 35,009

Adopt-a-Bronco:
D.J. Williams
Default

Perhaps you should write an article on the second Cuban Missile Crisis as well.
__________________
SoCalBronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2010, 12:21 AM   #10
Natedogg
1st Amendment Protection
 
Natedogg's Avatar
 
You givin' me a ride home Russell??

Join Date: May 2005
Location: Narcville, USA
Posts: 2,099

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Travis Henry
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SoCalBronco View Post
Perhaps you should write an article on the second Cuban Missile Crisis as well.
During the Carter administration?
Natedogg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2010, 12:31 AM   #11
uplink
Ring of Famer
 
uplink's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,978
Default

From TV documentaries:

The Nazis had a plan to attach the U.S. with long range bomber projects in the initial stages. Hitler wrote a follow up to 'mein kamp' where he focuses on eliminating the U.S.

Fidel was a pragmatist and Che was the reason for all the Cuban extremist actions such as housing Soviet bombs and wanting to use them, fighting in the Congo, Boliva, etc etc. When Che left for Boliva and then was killed, the Cuban problem was much milder.

These guys that display the Che images don't seem to realize this guy murdered a bunch of people (he ran the executions after Fidel seized power) and almost caused WWIII and would have loved it. He didn't value human life, just his idealism.
uplink is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2010, 12:41 AM   #12
Archer81
Optimum Homo
 
Archer81's Avatar
 
Tactical Neck.

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 22,377
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by uplink View Post
From TV documentaries:

The Nazis had a plan to attach the U.S. with long range bomber projects in the initial stages. Hitler wrote a follow up to 'mein kamp' where he focuses on eliminating the U.S.

Fidel was a pragmatist and Che was the reason for all the Cuban extremist actions such as housing Soviet bombs and wanting to use them, fighting in the Congo, Boliva, etc etc. When Che left for Boliva and then was killed, the Cuban problem was much milder.

These guys that display the Che images don't seem to realize this guy murdered a bunch of people (he ran the executions after Fidel seized power) and almost caused WWIII and would have loved it. He didn't value human life, just his idealism.

But but but...he rode a motorcycle through south america! and they made a flattering movie about him!

Archer81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2010, 12:47 AM   #13
SoCalBronco
Nixonite
 
SoCalBronco's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Arcadia, CA
Posts: 35,009

Adopt-a-Bronco:
D.J. Williams
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Natedogg View Post
During the Carter administration?
No. Cienfuegos, 1970.
__________________
SoCalBronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2010, 01:36 AM   #14
ZONA
Ring of Famer
 
ZONA's Avatar
 
Fun at the range MAR 2014

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 9,248

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Chris Harris
Default

Talk about close calls, Hitler's "secret weapon" the Messerschmitt Me 262 Jet Fighter was almost ready for production in 1945. Had he had that Jet Fighter just a year earlier, we all could be talking German today. A Jet Fighter would have easily turned things in favor of Hitler's Army. But the BMW jet engine, and the other one, both were just not totally reliable at the time. But still, there are those "what if's". What if, America didn't join the war when it did. What if we waited a year or 2? You never know.

http://thefutureofthings.com/column/...n-germany.html
ZONA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2010, 01:53 AM   #15
Killericon
YES A DT!!!!!!
 
Killericon's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: From Calgary, in Halifax for School
Posts: 7,673

Adopt-a-Bronco:
watermock
Default

Yeah, in Fog of War McNamara talks about how later him and Castro met and talked about the missiles already there and Castro's willingness to use them.
Killericon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2010, 06:39 AM   #16
mhgaffney
Ring of Famer
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 10,612
Default

The real story is that JFK stood up to the generals, eg. Curtis Lemay, all of whom pressured him to invade Cuba.

If JFK had not stood firm, if he had knuckled under to the Pentagon, none of us would be having this conversation.

JFK paid the ultimate price -- later -- when the CIA offed him.
mhgaffney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2010, 10:58 AM   #17
Archer81
Optimum Homo
 
Archer81's Avatar
 
Tactical Neck.

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 22,377
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mhgaffney View Post
The real story is that JFK stood up to the generals, eg. Curtis Lemay, all of whom pressured him to invade Cuba.

If JFK had not stood firm, if he had knuckled under to the Pentagon, none of us would be having this conversation.

JFK paid the ultimate price -- later -- when the CIA offed him.

Or if Kennedy had not pulled support for the Bay of Pigs at the last second, no missiles would have ever been sent to Cuba in the first place, and we never would have had a Cuban Missile Crisis...

And the CIA did not kill Kennedy.

Archer81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2010, 11:13 AM   #18
elsid13
Lost In Space
 
elsid13's Avatar
 
Bóg, Honor, Ojczyzna

Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: DC
Posts: 19,568
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Killericon View Post
Yeah, in Fog of War McNamara talks about how later him and Castro met and talked about the missiles already there and Castro's willingness to use them.
Great movie, anyone interested in American History should watch it.
elsid13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2010, 05:22 PM   #19
Cito Pelon
Attack at all times . . .
 
Cito Pelon's Avatar
 
Shabby County Seat

Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AFC Championshipville, NotTooShabby County
Posts: 15,990

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Slim Shabby
Default

Those were tough times in 1962. My uncle was SAC at Tyndall AFB and they were on total alert. There was absolutely no f'ing around at that time. The Caribbean was absolutely gonna be a US sphere of possession. The Monroe Doctrine was gonna be enforced, period. Naval and Air units were moved from all over as a massive military presence. Cuba was locked down. Kruschev could yell as loud as he wanted to but Cuba was locked down.

It was almost toe to toe, but NATO gave Kruschev some face by withdrawing missile batteries in Turkey from the Crimean front. That's a little known aspect of the Cuban Crisis. It was touch and go there for a little while. The story that Kennedy and Kruschev were eye to eye is not an exaggeration, they were eye to eye, and they were both thankful they didn't go toe to toe. Kruschev backed off at the last minute, and some say it's because of NATO withdrawing missile batteries in the Crimea.
Cito Pelon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2010, 05:37 PM   #20
Cito Pelon
Attack at all times . . .
 
Cito Pelon's Avatar
 
Shabby County Seat

Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AFC Championshipville, NotTooShabby County
Posts: 15,990

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Slim Shabby
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Natedogg View Post
The Soviets could have destroyed the USA with nuclear weapons (even by accident). The Nazis could not. Its doubtful the Nazis could have even crossed the Atlantic. They couldn't even cross the English Channel.

And I am almost completely certain that everything in my post is correct (check the links documenting my assertions). If you find anything specific I wrote that you don't think is true, let me know.
It was only a ploy. Put yourself in the Soviet's position. They were surrounded by nuclear capable positions. Japan, Korea, China was their enemy, Iran, Turkey, France, NATO, all the way to the Arctic Circle. The USSR was surrounded.
Cito Pelon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2010, 07:51 PM   #21
uplink
Ring of Famer
 
uplink's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,978
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Natedogg View Post
Its doubtful the Nazis could have even crossed the Atlantic. They couldn't even cross the English Channel.
They could have but couldn't gain air superiority. I don't think a battle has been won since the end of WWI without holding air superiority.
uplink is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2010, 07:59 PM   #22
Natedogg
1st Amendment Protection
 
Natedogg's Avatar
 
You givin' me a ride home Russell??

Join Date: May 2005
Location: Narcville, USA
Posts: 2,099

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Travis Henry
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cito Pelon View Post
It was only a ploy. Put yourself in the Soviet's position. They were surrounded by nuclear capable positions. Japan, Korea, China was their enemy, Iran, Turkey, France, NATO, all the way to the Arctic Circle. The USSR was surrounded.
I know (MA in Cold War history). But the fact is the Soviets had enough nukes to destroy the world. Only we and them (and now Russia) could do that.

Some people think that Mutually Assured Destruction was a great idea. Start reading up on Launch on Warning.
Natedogg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2010, 08:01 PM   #23
Natedogg
1st Amendment Protection
 
Natedogg's Avatar
 
You givin' me a ride home Russell??

Join Date: May 2005
Location: Narcville, USA
Posts: 2,099

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Travis Henry
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cito Pelon View Post
Those were tough times in 1962. My uncle was SAC at Tyndall AFB and they were on total alert. There was absolutely no f'ing around at that time. The Caribbean was absolutely gonna be a US sphere of possession. The Monroe Doctrine was gonna be enforced, period. Naval and Air units were moved from all over as a massive military presence. Cuba was locked down. Kruschev could yell as loud as he wanted to but Cuba was locked down.

It was almost toe to toe, but NATO gave Kruschev some face by withdrawing missile batteries in Turkey from the Crimean front. That's a little known aspect of the Cuban Crisis. It was touch and go there for a little while. The story that Kennedy and Kruschev were eye to eye is not an exaggeration, they were eye to eye, and they were both thankful they didn't go toe to toe. Kruschev backed off at the last minute, and some say it's because of NATO withdrawing missile batteries in the Crimea.
Thats what my article is all about. RFK and the Soviet Amabassador Dobrynin made the deal. And btw, its Khrushchev
Natedogg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2010, 08:01 PM   #24
Killericon
YES A DT!!!!!!
 
Killericon's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: From Calgary, in Halifax for School
Posts: 7,673

Adopt-a-Bronco:
watermock
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by uplink View Post
They could have but couldn't gain air superiority. I don't think a battle has been won since the end of WWI without holding air superiority.
*Cough* Vietnam, Russia/Afghanistan *Cough*
Killericon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2010, 08:03 PM   #25
Natedogg
1st Amendment Protection
 
Natedogg's Avatar
 
You givin' me a ride home Russell??

Join Date: May 2005
Location: Narcville, USA
Posts: 2,099

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Travis Henry
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by uplink View Post
They could have but couldn't gain air superiority. I don't think a battle has been won since the end of WWI without holding air superiority.
Or Naval. The WW2 historical consensus is that the British navy would not have lets the Krauts through.
Natedogg is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes



Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:29 AM.


Denver Broncos