The Orange Mane -  a Denver Broncos Fan Community  

Go Back   The Orange Mane - a Denver Broncos Fan Community > Orange Mane Discussion > Orange Mane Central Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Chat Room Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-10-2010, 09:36 AM   #1
rugbythug
Church Eyes.
 
rugbythug's Avatar
 
Salty Dog

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,046

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Mr. Miller
Default Where to Change First Things First.

1. Left Guard. Since probably the 2005 Season. The Ben Hamilton Spot has been a serious Problem in Short Yardage. This year with the Blocking style changes that problem seemed to spread from just Short Yardage But to every run Play. Off Tackle, Sweeps were forced back before the runner was able to go North/South. Watch the good running teams this year. Chris Johnson was clean till positive yardage on every play. Every Bronco back had a hand on them in the back field on nearly every play. Keeping the LOS clean till the runner can hit the hole must change for this team to play well next year.

2. Defensive Tackle-At the end of this season Off Tackle runs were pure gold. I don't know the average gain but I am sure it was massive. Less so were outside runs, and runs up the gut. So IMO 2 tackles first and then the nose. Also other than the ageless Vonnie Holiday no pressure was ever generated. Kenny P. Looked great in preseason but disappeared later in the year. Good teams get pressure from these guys.

Improve the above and we win 20-30% more games.

From those two glaring issues we run into a lot of lesser issues.
1.RB Play
2.WR #2
3.Inside LB
4.QB Play-Orton is fine when the play is working as drawn up. But plays like he has vertigo if pressure comes or the first receiver is not open. For all the check down complaints he gets. He rarely ever makes a check down throw that generates positive yds. Mostly he checks it down into a players cleat.
5.Nickle CB
rugbythug is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 01-10-2010, 09:46 AM   #2
gunns
I WANT DEFENSE!
 
gunns's Avatar
 
Defense, defense, defense

Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Always Hoping
Posts: 12,424

Adopt-a-Bronco:
TJ Ward
Default

Those are my thoughts exactly...OL and DL. People say TD being brought in helped Elway win those SB's. It was more the OL, who helped Elway and TD. The two anchors to each side. Improve them, you improve the rest of the team.
gunns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2010, 09:56 AM   #3
gtown
Perennial Pro-bowler
 
Hoya Saxa!!

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: DC
Posts: 921

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Juggernaut #46
Default

Of all the OL I have seen in the draft, I have been most impressed with Iupati. That guy is a monster. He played a nearly perfect bowl game and every time I saw him, I came away awed. If we get an extra first rounder, I hope we target this guy.

And what of Olsen? Was he that raw?
gtown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2010, 09:57 AM   #4
Lev Vyvanse
Ring of Famer
 
Lev Vyvanse's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 3,048
Default

Did you mean D Ends?
Lev Vyvanse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2010, 10:00 AM   #5
watermock
"Hoodie Jr"
 
watermock's Avatar
 
"Hug me!"

Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Hot Springs, Ouachitah
Posts: 76,813
Default

Quote:
If we get an extra first rounder, I hope
WE had one...he got fronted by Ty Law and and a free agent midsason.
watermock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2010, 10:01 AM   #6
Tombstone RJ
Ring of Famer
 
Tombstone RJ's Avatar
 
Old School

Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: In the Tetons!
Posts: 21,937

Adopt-a-Bronco:
WorrellWilliams
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rugbythug View Post
1. Left Guard. Since probably the 2005 Season. The Ben Hamilton Spot has been a serious Problem in Short Yardage. This year with the Blocking style changes that problem seemed to spread from just Short Yardage But to every run Play. Off Tackle, Sweeps were forced back before the runner was able to go North/South. Watch the good running teams this year. Chris Johnson was clean till positive yardage on every play. Every Bronco back had a hand on them in the back field on nearly every play. Keeping the LOS clean till the runner can hit the hole must change for this team to play well next year.

2. Defensive Tackle-At the end of this season Off Tackle runs were pure gold. I don't know the average gain but I am sure it was massive. Less so were outside runs, and runs up the gut. So IMO 2 tackles first and then the nose. Also other than the ageless Vonnie Holiday no pressure was ever generated. Kenny P. Looked great in preseason but disappeared later in the year. Good teams get pressure from these guys.

Improve the above and we win 20-30% more games.

From those two glaring issues we run into a lot of lesser issues.
1.RB Play
2.WR #2
3.Inside LB
4.QB Play-Orton is fine when the play is working as drawn up. But plays like he has vertigo if pressure comes or the first receiver is not open. For all the check down complaints he gets. He rarely ever makes a check down throw that generates positive yds. Mostly he checks it down into a players cleat.
5.Nickle CB
I agree, however the Broncos need to start with a center, and then a left guard. Fix those two positions and the entirior of the oline startes to solidify.
Tombstone RJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2010, 10:08 AM   #7
ludo21
RIP Darrent Williams
 
ludo21's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Glendale, AZ
Posts: 19,053

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Paul Ernster
Default

Agreed, OL and DL are the answers, as always.

WR #1 is what we need though, I doubt BMarsh is here next season.
ludo21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2010, 10:12 AM   #8
gyldenlove
Ring of Famer
 
gyldenlove's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Nęstved, DK
Posts: 10,890

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Spencer Larsen
Default

It is funny how fast history is rewritten, last year we had the best offensive line in franchise history from a statistical point of view and even though we all know it didn't have as much talent as the lines of the late 90s it was still pretty damn good. But now all of a sudden we have had line trouble since 2005?

Lets say it like it is, Mcdaniels wants to play a system he doesn't have the players for, he is a slightly more talented Jim Bates in that respect. So now we have to spend a lot of resources and time trying to replace at least 2 offensive linemen, and while we do that every other fault with Mcdaniels offense can be entirely blamed on the offensive line. The fact that our run game suffered so badly had nothing to do with our beloved 1st round runningback, or the fact that we ran almost exclusively from double or triple TE sets, practically telegraphing the defense what was coming, and certainly had nothing to do with our complete lack of passes of more than 10 yards which allowed the defense to load up the line of scrimmage. It had nothing to do with the playcalling, running on 1st down and then passing on 2nd and 3rd. It was all due to the interior offensive line.

The funny thing is, we were leading the league for about half the season when it came to negative yards, we had less than 1 per game, but I am assume that was also because of the interior line.

I agree we need help on the interior line, but let us not rewrite history just yet to hide all the obvious blemishes with our offense, because most of them are not attributable to the interior line.
gyldenlove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2010, 10:56 AM   #9
Pony Boy
"Whoa Nellie"
 
Pony Boy's Avatar
 
Omaha !!!

Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 7,583

Adopt-a-Bronco:
mellon head
Default

Rebirth of the Fridge ......Mt Cody in the middle and at fullback on the goal line.

Perry scores at fullback...POW .....

Pony Boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2010, 10:59 AM   #10
eddie mac
Ireland's No1 Bronco
 
eddie mac's Avatar
 
Eddie Mac 87 gone but never forgott

Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: IRELAND
Posts: 16,621

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Rod Smith
Default

Look at the Saints. IMHO the OL play of Nicks and Evans alone at both OG positions was one of the major reasons this team has shot through the roof offensively.
eddie mac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2010, 11:43 AM   #11
Tombstone RJ
Ring of Famer
 
Tombstone RJ's Avatar
 
Old School

Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: In the Tetons!
Posts: 21,937

Adopt-a-Bronco:
WorrellWilliams
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gyldenlove View Post
It is funny how fast history is rewritten, last year we had the best offensive line in franchise history from a statistical point of view and even though we all know it didn't have as much talent as the lines of the late 90s it was still pretty damn good. But now all of a sudden we have had line trouble since 2005?

Lets say it like it is, Mcdaniels wants to play a system he doesn't have the players for, he is a slightly more talented Jim Bates in that respect. So now we have to spend a lot of resources and time trying to replace at least 2 offensive linemen, and while we do that every other fault with Mcdaniels offense can be entirely blamed on the offensive line. The fact that our run game suffered so badly had nothing to do with our beloved 1st round runningback, or the fact that we ran almost exclusively from double or triple TE sets, practically telegraphing the defense what was coming, and certainly had nothing to do with our complete lack of passes of more than 10 yards which allowed the defense to load up the line of scrimmage. It had nothing to do with the playcalling, running on 1st down and then passing on 2nd and 3rd. It was all due to the interior offensive line.

The funny thing is, we were leading the league for about half the season when it came to negative yards, we had less than 1 per game, but I am assume that was also because of the interior line.

I agree we need help on the interior line, but let us not rewrite history just yet to hide all the obvious blemishes with our offense, because most of them are not attributable to the interior line.
Well said, no argument here. I'm a big fan of the oline and much of the offenses problems arise from the play calling. Not sure why McD was so vanilla, maybe he was trying to prove a point, that is, "we are gonna live and die by these plays and at the end of the season, I'm gonna know where our strength and weaknes truly are for my offense...."

Did McD sacrifice this year to prove a point? I dunno, but it's a ligit question.
Tombstone RJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2010, 11:59 AM   #12
Rohirrim
Partisan
 
Rohirrim's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Twixt Hell & Highwater
Posts: 53,921

Adopt-a-Bronco:
CJ Anderson
Default

IMO, to build a winning football team, you start with the basics: Build a line that can get you one yard, anytime, anywhere on the field, against any opponent, no matter what the situation. Once you have that, start working back.
Rohirrim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2010, 12:19 PM   #13
PRBronco
_never forget_
 
PRBronco's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2004
Location: Calgary
Posts: 4,239

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Vathquezth
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rugbythug View Post
1. Left Guard. Since probably the 2005 Season. The Ben Hamilton Spot has been a serious Problem in Short Yardage. This year with the Blocking style changes that problem seemed to spread from just Short Yardage But to every run Play. Off Tackle, Sweeps were forced back before the runner was able to go North/South. Watch the good running teams this year. Chris Johnson was clean till positive yardage on every play. Every Bronco back had a hand on them in the back field on nearly every play. Keeping the LOS clean till the runner can hit the hole must change for this team to play well next year.

2. Defensive Tackle-At the end of this season Off Tackle runs were pure gold. I don't know the average gain but I am sure it was massive. Less so were outside runs, and runs up the gut. So IMO 2 tackles first and then the nose. Also other than the ageless Vonnie Holiday no pressure was ever generated. Kenny P. Looked great in preseason but disappeared later in the year. Good teams get pressure from these guys.

Improve the above and we win 20-30% more games.

From those two glaring issues we run into a lot of lesser issues.
1.RB Play
2.WR #2
3.Inside LB
4.QB Play-Orton is fine when the play is working as drawn up. But plays like he has vertigo if pressure comes or the first receiver is not open. For all the check down complaints he gets. He rarely ever makes a check down throw that generates positive yds. Mostly he checks it down into a players cleat.
5.Nickle CB
Great post, I'd like to say I agree with everything, but I just read an excellent thread on the mane that told me that our running game is bad because McD is petulant and Knowshon is a bust. Shonn Greene would make Ben Hamilton a better blocker.

Jk of course. It all starts with the line. I'm watching Mankins play right now and am envious, I just saw him stone Ngata.
PRBronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2010, 01:52 PM   #14
rugbythug
Church Eyes.
 
rugbythug's Avatar
 
Salty Dog

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,046

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Mr. Miller
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gyldenlove View Post
It is funny how fast history is rewritten, last year we had the best offensive line in franchise history from a statistical point of view and even though we all know it didn't have as much talent as the lines of the late 90s it was still pretty damn good. But now all of a sudden we have had line trouble since 2005?

Lets say it like it is, Mcdaniels wants to play a system he doesn't have the players for, he is a slightly more talented Jim Bates in that respect. So now we have to spend a lot of resources and time trying to replace at least 2 offensive linemen, and while we do that every other fault with Mcdaniels offense can be entirely blamed on the offensive line. The fact that our run game suffered so badly had nothing to do with our beloved 1st round runningback, or the fact that we ran almost exclusively from double or triple TE sets, practically telegraphing the defense what was coming, and certainly had nothing to do with our complete lack of passes of more than 10 yards which allowed the defense to load up the line of scrimmage. It had nothing to do with the playcalling, running on 1st down and then passing on 2nd and 3rd. It was all due to the interior offensive line.

The funny thing is, we were leading the league for about half the season when it came to negative yards, we had less than 1 per game, but I am assume that was also because of the interior line.

I agree we need help on the interior line, but let us not rewrite history just yet to hide all the obvious blemishes with our offense, because most of them are not attributable to the interior line.
We have not been a strong 3rd and Short team since 05. Anyone who has seen a game knows this. Maybe you have a hard time remembering. How about the 07 Detroit Game?
rugbythug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2010, 01:58 PM   #15
rastaman
Ring of Famer
 
New to the Forum

Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 7,180

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pony Boy View Post
Rebirth of the Fridge ......Mt Cody in the middle and at fullback on the goal line.

Perry scores at fullback...POW .....

Fridge ate himself out of the league. Mount Cody will probably do the same.
rastaman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2010, 02:23 PM   #16
skpac1001
Ring of Famer
 
skpac1001's Avatar
 
I brings the ruckus

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Temecula, Ca
Posts: 1,091

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rugbythug View Post
We have not been a strong 3rd and Short team since 05. Anyone who has seen a game knows this. Maybe you have a hard time remembering. How about the 07 Detroit Game?
I'm not really sure what to make of this, but I will throw it out there.
According to NFL.com, we are 11th in the league at Power rushing, as defined by
Rush Pwr = Percentage of rushes on 3rd or 4th down with 2 or fewer yards to go that achieved a first down or TD. Also includes rushes on 1st-and-goal and 2nd-and-goal from the opponent's 2-yard line or closer.
http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorysta...M&d-447263-p=1

There seems to be as many mammoth power rush lines below us as above.

Edit: I screwed this up pretty badly. I counted only power runs right, at which we ranked 11th. Power runs to the center ranked 30th. Power runs left ranked 14th.

Last edited by skpac1001; 01-10-2010 at 02:53 PM..
skpac1001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2010, 02:28 PM   #17
gyldenlove
Ring of Famer
 
gyldenlove's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Nęstved, DK
Posts: 10,890

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Spencer Larsen
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rugbythug View Post
We have not been a strong 3rd and Short team since 05. Anyone who has seen a game knows this. Maybe you have a hard time remembering. How about the 07 Detroit Game?
When did I bring up 07 as being a good year? I talked about 08 being a good year for our offensive line.

Here is the list of teams who converted better on 3rd down in 2008 than we did:

Indianapolis Colts


(We finished 2nd in the league tied with New Orleans at a 48% conversion rate)

Do you still want to tell me how awful we were on 3rd downs?

I will give you this one chance to walk away from a bad argument you can't win.
gyldenlove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2010, 02:29 PM   #18
gyldenlove
Ring of Famer
 
gyldenlove's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Nęstved, DK
Posts: 10,890

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Spencer Larsen
Default

And for reference: here is the difference a year and poor offensive playcalling makes:

From 48% to 36%, that is a drop of 25% from 08 to 09.
gyldenlove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2010, 02:31 PM   #19
WolfpackGuy
Call me, "Maybe"
 
WolfpackGuy's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Delaware
Posts: 6,733
Default

The team was absolutely horrible in short yardage and goalline this season.
WolfpackGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2010, 02:44 PM   #20
Bronx33
lets go partner
 
Bronx33's Avatar
 
Rumpson Rocks

Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Lakewood,Colo
Posts: 40,525

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Woodyard
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WolfpackGuy View Post
The team was absolutely horrible in short yardage and goalline this season.


Calling the same play over and over didn't help either.
Bronx33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2010, 02:47 PM   #21
skpac1001
Ring of Famer
 
skpac1001's Avatar
 
I brings the ruckus

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Temecula, Ca
Posts: 1,091

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WolfpackGuy View Post
The team was absolutely horrible in short yardage and goalline this season.
Was there any yardage situations we were good at? I doubt we were ranked any higher in med to long yardage situations then we were at short.
skpac1001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2010, 02:52 PM   #22
WolfpackGuy
Call me, "Maybe"
 
WolfpackGuy's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Delaware
Posts: 6,733
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skpac1001 View Post
Was there any yardage situations we were good at? I doubt we were ranked any higher in med to long yardage situations then we were at short.
That 2nd and 87 against the Bengals was pretty good.

I bet they're tops in that category...
WolfpackGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2010, 02:59 PM   #23
Dedhed
Ring of Famer
 
Dedhed's Avatar
 
Fare thee well

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 10,155

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Q Smith
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gtown View Post
Of all the OL I have seen in the draft, I have been most impressed with Iupati. That guy is a monster. He played a nearly perfect bowl game and every time I saw him, I came away awed. If we get an extra first rounder, I hope we target this guy.
Why do we need an extra 1st to target this guy?
Dedhed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2010, 03:01 PM   #24
skpac1001
Ring of Famer
 
skpac1001's Avatar
 
I brings the ruckus

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Temecula, Ca
Posts: 1,091

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dedhed View Post
Why do we need an extra 1st to target this guy?
I think taking him at 11 would be a little early value-wise. We could always trade down though.
skpac1001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2010, 03:12 PM   #25
Dedhed
Ring of Famer
 
Dedhed's Avatar
 
Fare thee well

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 10,155

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Q Smith
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skpac1001 View Post
I think taking him at 11 would be a little early value-wise. We could always trade down though.
I can stand that argument. We have a great player available at a great area of need, but people worry about taking him 5 or 6 picks before some random value board has him listed.

It's a "two in the bush is greater than one in the hand" argument, and imo, completely fallacious.
Dedhed is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes



Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:03 AM.


Denver Broncos