If Kyle Orton had 17 ints so far, what would our record be? - The Orange Mane

bronco0608 · 11-14-2009, 12:28 PM

Poll!

Broncotilldeath · 11-14-2009, 12:31 PM

loborugger · 11-14-2009, 12:31 PM

0 and 8.

Check that, we probably woulda bet Cleveland.

1 and 7.

Bronx33 · 11-14-2009, 12:40 PM

Not nearly enough options.

LRtagger · 11-14-2009, 12:41 PM

WTF where is 3-5

??

Arkie · 11-14-2009, 12:54 PM

2-6 if they were spread out an even two picks per game

6-2 or 5-3 if half of them were clumped together in a couple of games like Jay's 9 picks against the Pack and Niners

BlaK-Argentina · 11-14-2009, 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arkie

2-6 if they were spread out an even two picks per game

6-2 or 5-3 if half of them were clumped together in a couple of games like Jay's 9 picks against the Pack and Niners

6-2? No way. 5-3 with a LOT of luck.

2-6 sounds about right. Wins against CLE and OAK.

oubronco · 11-14-2009, 01:12 PM

I don't have any idea but popps would still be sucking his rod

strafen · 11-14-2009, 01:12 PM

Any time you hear the phrase "game manager" that means...you suck as a QB.
It means he's there to play not to lose.
Despite not having thrown any significant INT's until we played Pitts, he still had not done anything spectacular to win us any game.
I would give the game we won against NE as the only game out of 6 wins when Orton was a factor.
Other than that, he's been irrelevant on all the remaining 5 wins, and totally responsible for our two losses where he showed his inability to rally from behind and win a game when is still within our grasp...

Swedish Extrovert · 11-14-2009, 01:27 PM

2-6.

We would have lost all those close games. Probably still have beaten Oakland and Cleveland.

Br0nc0Buster · 11-14-2009, 01:33 PM

Id say 2-6 with the only wins against Cleveland and Oakland

DenverBrit · 11-14-2009, 02:18 PM

Who knows, he might throw all 17 ints in one game.

DenverBound · 11-14-2009, 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oubronco

I don't have any idea but popps would still be sucking his rod

You'd probably enjoy that, huh?

oubronco · 11-14-2009, 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DenverBound

You'd probably enjoy that, huh?

popps would

errand · 11-14-2009, 09:47 PM

The funny thing is, Kyle Orton hasn't thrown 17 INT's in the same time it's taken Jay to toss 35 of them.

Popps · 11-14-2009, 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oubronco

I don't have any idea but popps would still be sucking his rod

The thing is, if you're going to be one of my stalkers, you at least need to do enough homework to know how silly that statement is.

Knowing that Cutler isn't a "franchise QB" doesn't mean I'm automatically in love with his replacement.

Sorry you've been on the wrong side of all of this. Like a lot of trolls, this has been a rough time for you.

I suggest forming some sort of support group for people that don't understand football.

oubronco · 11-15-2009, 08:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Popps

The thing is, if you're going to be one of my stalkers, you at least need to do enough homework to know how silly that statement is.

Knowing that Cutler isn't a "franchise QB" doesn't mean I'm automatically in love with his replacement.

Sorry you've been on the wrong side of all of this. Like a lot of trolls, this has been a rough time for you.

I suggest forming some sort of support group for people that don't understand football.

Sorry poops the Cutler thing is long gone most people have moved on except you and we hear it week in and week out how you just love Orton's nuts so don't come at me with your weak smack about being a troll I loves me some Broncos football except for Orton mainly because he can't seem to throw an accurate pass more than 5-10 yds after that his throws are behind or way too high and he just has a knack for moving into the pass rushers instead of away from them or hit a wr in stride if he can prove it on the field more than half a game then fine i'll be on board but unfortunately he's limited in these areas

GeniusatWork · 11-15-2009, 08:26 AM

2-6 best

View Poll Results: Guess Denver's record with a QB throwing 17 ints
0-8 It's the offensive cordinator's fault!	3	11.11%
1-7 It's the running back's fault!	7	25.93%
2-6 It's his Oline's fault!	11	40.74%
4-4 It's his receivers fault!	6	22.22%
5-3 Did you see how put the team in position to win?	0	0%
6-2 He is adjusting to the system!	0	0%
Voters: 27. You may not vote on this poll

11-14-2009, 12:28 PM	#1
bronco0608 Ring of Famer New to the Forum Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 1,177 Adopt-a-Bronco: None	If Kyle Orton had 17 ints so far, what would our record be? Poll! Last edited by bronco0608; 11-14-2009 at 12:32 PM..

11-14-2009, 12:31 PM	#2
Broncotilldeath Rookie New to the Forum Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 61 Adopt-a-Bronco: None	1-7

11-14-2009, 12:41 PM	#5
LRtagger Ring of Famer CUT THAT MEAT Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 1,258 Adopt-a-Bronco: None	WTF where is 3-5??

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

11-14-2009, 12:31 PM	#3
loborugger lost in the ether Did we finally get a FB??? Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: The 'cuse Posts: 5,783 Adopt-a-Bronco: Peyton Hillis	0 and 8. Check that, we probably woulda bet Cleveland. 1 and 7.

11-14-2009, 12:40 PM	#4
Bronx33 lets go partner Rumpson Rocks Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Lakewood,Colo Posts: 41,221 Adopt-a-Bronco: Woodyard	Not nearly enough options.

11-14-2009, 12:54 PM	#6
Arkie Ring of Famer Gggggrrrrrr rrrraaaahhh Arrrrhhhn. Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 9,083 Adopt-a-Bronco: Quinton Carter	2-6 if they were spread out an even two picks per game 6-2 or 5-3 if half of them were clumped together in a couple of games like Jay's 9 picks against the Pack and Niners

11-14-2009, 01:12 PM	#8
oubronco John Foneco !! Mile High Magic Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Sooner Country Posts: 20,604	I don't have any idea but popps would still be sucking his rod

11-14-2009, 01:12 PM	#9
strafen Karma Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 6,928 Adopt-a-Bronco: Elway	Any time you hear the phrase "game manager" that means...you suck as a QB. It means he's there to play not to lose. Despite not having thrown any significant INT's until we played Pitts, he still had not done anything spectacular to win us any game. I would give the game we won against NE as the only game out of 6 wins when Orton was a factor. Other than that, he's been irrelevant on all the remaining 5 wins, and totally responsible for our two losses where he showed his inability to rally from behind and win a game when is still within our grasp...

11-14-2009, 01:27 PM	#10
Swedish Extrovert President of the Universe Formerly known as mightysmurf Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Highlands Ranch Posts: 14,959 Adopt-a-Bronco: Joel Dreesen	2-6. We would have lost all those close games. Probably still have beaten Oakland and Cleveland.

11-14-2009, 01:33 PM	#11
Br0nc0Buster 2012 AFC West Champs stiff arming through the playoffs Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Kansas Posts: 4,434	Id say 2-6 with the only wins against Cleveland and Oakland

11-14-2009, 02:18 PM	#12
DenverBrit Just hanging out. Got a breath mint?? Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Denver Posts: 11,072 Adopt-a-Bronco: The Team	Who knows, he might throw all 17 ints in one game.

11-14-2009, 09:47 PM	#15
errand Ring of Famer Forgot more than you'll ever know Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Western NC mountains Posts: 15,062	The funny thing is, Kyle Orton hasn't thrown 17 INT's in the same time it's taken Jay to toss 35 of them.

11-15-2009, 08:26 AM	#18
GeniusatWork I like to be optimistic But not nauseatingly optimistic Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Denver Posts: 243 Adopt-a-Bronco: None	2-6 best