![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 7,180
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
Monday, September 28, 2009
By Parie II. The latest trick from corporate America is to force out workers that are 62 plus so that they don’t count as unemployed rather they are "retired". This is creating a surge in social security claims that will put the system in the red for the first time since the Reagan recession. Reagan then doubled the tax, the biggest tax increase ever. A tax that was levied on the poor and middle class; the rich don’t pay anything on the "rich" part of their income (no flat tax for them). Current revenue is also down as wages are being depressed and also from having 30 million people out of work. Claims filed for retirement or disability under Social Security rose 900,000 over the previous year for the fiscal year ending this month. This trend will only accelerate as more people exhaust their unemployment benefits in the so called jobless recovery. Extensions to benefits passed by Congress only apply in about half of the states. Another big advantage to retirement is that you can get single payer health insurance from the government (shhh, don’t tell the kids). There are in fact trillions of dollars in the Social Security reserve fund, but Reagan, Bush and Bush stole that money, so more money will have to be borrowed to replace the empty fund. Bush called the special Treasury Bonds issued for this purpose worthless paper. It’s the truth if you accept the premise that the Republicans have destroyed our economy and government. He would know, since he was instrumental in making that so. The right-wingers are throwing a self righteous fit, "we told you that Social Security would go broke and should be put in the stock market, wait, wait, we mean we told you it should be put in real estate, wait, we mean it should be in Treasury Bonds (it already is in Treasury Bonds)... well, err, aaa, we told you so!" The Social Security Adm. says it will even out again in about two years as corporations run out of people to push into retirement, of course they are assuming the economy won’t get worse. Just the same the corporate media is pushing the notion that Congress needs to "fix" Social Security by slashing benefits, raising the retirement age and increasing taxes even though the only problem is the looted treasury. Repealing the Reagan tax cuts would fix all our problems but since the top 1% now own more than the bottom 90%, don’t hold your breath. We’re approaching the distribution of wealth ratio they had in the old Soviet Union where the party elite effectively "owned" almost everything. At least there everybody got health care and a pension. I guess we can’t expect that, Comrade. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 2,347
Adopt-a-Bronco: Offensive Line |
Great article... but most folks won't get it.... after all, isn't Obama, who is trying to fis the damage, the great socialist nazi who is destroying our great country?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Hokie since 1993
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 45,991
Adopt-a-Bronco: Tom Jackson |
Lol. The president can take money fron SS? Please explain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 7,180
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
Quote:
Before Reagan, America had a steel industry. After Reagan, it didn't. Before Reagan, America had a viable automotive industry. After Reagan, the US was buying its cars from Japan. Before Reagan, small retailers still existed. After Reagan, small stores had all but disappeared, giving way to huge corporate chains, and, in time, WalMart --the economic Kudzu that ate America. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Hokie since 1993
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 45,991
Adopt-a-Bronco: Tom Jackson |
You tell so many lies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Partisan
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Twixt Hell & Highwater
Posts: 48,842
|
Capitalism is fine. What we have is corporatism. And corporatism is just a modern name for an old system: Feudalism. I guess it's not a pure feudal system, because there really is no king. It's more like a feudal oligarchy with a bunch of lords and barons and then everybody else; The serfs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 7,180
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
Oh really! Its obvious Republican Administrations can't govern a nation economically, financially, and domestically.
Any Democratic President has presided over greater economic growth and job creation than any Republican President since World War II. When Bush Jr took office, job creation was worst under a Republican, Bush Sr, at 0.6% per year and best under a Democrat, Johnson, at 3.8% per year. Economic growth under President Carter was far greater than under Reagan or Bush Sr. In fact, economic growth in general was greater under Johnson, Kennedy, Carter, and Clinton than under Reagan or Bush. Democrats always outperform a failed party: the GOP! The job creation rate under Clinton was 2.4% significantly higher than Ronald Reagan's 2.1% per year. The "top performing Presidents" by this standard, in order from best down, were Johnson, Carter, Clinton, and Kennedy. The "worst" (in descending order) were Nixon, Reagan, Bush. Half of jobs created under Reagan were in the public sector--some 2 million jobs added to the Federal Bureaucracy. Hadn't he promised to reduce that bureaucracy? Reagan, though promising to reduce government and spending, tripled the national debt and left huge deficits to his successor. Bush Jr's record will be even worse. By contrast, most of the jobs created on Clinton's watch were in the private sector. Put another way: any Democratic President beats any Republican President since World War II. Only the GOP could have destroyed a nation so efficiently and have the nerve to tout it on TV ads! Bush Jr has finished the job begun by Reagan. See ya' in hell! |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Don't Argue With Me
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 5,023
Adopt-a-Bronco: Darris Nash |
And your solution is communism. Boy, that will really work.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|