The Orange Mane -  a Denver Broncos Fan Community  

Go Back   The Orange Mane - a Denver Broncos Fan Community > Orange Mane Discussion > Orange Mane Central Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Chat Room Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-11-2009, 01:11 AM   #1
cutthemdown
A verbis ad verbera
 
cutthemdown's Avatar
 
Zimm to HOF

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 36,489
Default The rules in an uncapped yr.

No cap means teams can spend whatever they want, but also small market teams can spend as little as they want. The current cap has a minimum.

Instead of 4 years, a player need 6 yrs to be an unrestricted FA.

Teams can use the franchise tag, and 2 transition tags. So basically you could lock up one players rights, and get right to match on 2 others.

Playoff teams reaching the final eight spots only would be able to sign a free agent if they lose one of their own, and the final four teams could sign only one free agent for every two they lose.




Sorry if someone already pointed all this out I had not read the part about the winning teams being limited in FA. IMO it would make for a boring offseason of little movement, not the free for all people seem to think.
cutthemdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 09-11-2009, 01:47 AM   #2
Elway777
Ring of Famer
 

Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,886
Default

So we own the rights to Marshall for another year.
Elway777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 01:53 AM   #3
Taco John
24/7 Broncos
 
Taco John's Avatar
 
All Hail King Midas

Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 50,419

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Peyton Manning
Default

Dogs and cats living together! Mass hysteria!
Taco John is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 02:40 AM   #4
BroncoMan4ever
Ring of Famer
 
BroncoMan4ever's Avatar
 
That's just like your opinion, man

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 13,219

Adopt-a-Bronco:
VIRGIL GREEN!!!
Default

i think this will get resolved before the uncapped year. the players are under the thinking that they are going to get paid if the NFL goes uncapped, but the moment it is possible for teams to begin going bare bones on the finances in paying players you are going to start seeing teams slashing payrolls and not putting forth anywhere near the best possible product on the field, and teams like Washington, Dallas and Oakland playing the NFL like the Yankees and Red Sox play baseball, mega contracts to the best players in the league that no one else can dream of matching. also with teams not being capable of either competing with the top financially sound teams or just wanting to cut costs as much as possible the players are going to suffer in their attempts to get paid.

if the league goes uncapped, the players will be the biggest losers in the scenario.
BroncoMan4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 03:06 AM   #5
cutthemdown
A verbis ad verbera
 
cutthemdown's Avatar
 
Zimm to HOF

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 36,489
Default

Oakland not making money and Davis not rich by NFL owner standards.

But even with money if those teams finished in the playoffs they can't really sign anyone unless they lose FA. So you lose a star to sign a star makes little sense.

It could be good for Broncos though if we miss playoffs. We could then sign whoever we want.

In fact some big winning teams may not match offers on RFA or try to resign other big names because they need to lose a player to get into the market and target players they covet.

It really does sound like there are tons of angles us fans are ignorant or in the dark about.

Marshall may be better off getting what he can get now. Broncos might want to think about locking up Kuper as well.
cutthemdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 03:07 AM   #6
cutthemdown
A verbis ad verbera
 
cutthemdown's Avatar
 
Zimm to HOF

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 36,489
Default

so Bronco man you think it will get resolved before next off-season? I think you are the only one who does. It sure doesn't sound like they can iron out everything that soon.

The players union rep is now saying players may never agree to a cap again.
cutthemdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 03:08 AM   #7
cutthemdown
A verbis ad verbera
 
cutthemdown's Avatar
 
Zimm to HOF

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 36,489
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taco John View Post
Dogs and cats living together! Mass hysteria!
Just pointing out how it might not be the free for all you had talked about in some other threads.

Good input though.
cutthemdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 03:18 AM   #8
CHANGSTER
You are a pizza burn...
 
CHANGSTER's Avatar
 
on the roof of the world's mouth

Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SD
Posts: 1,530
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cutthemdown View Post
Oakland not making money and Davis not rich by NFL owner standards.
I foresee Al Davis selling off part of the team if the league goes uncapped. He's done it before.


I also agree that as a whole players will get less money than they are now rather than more. Most teams are pained to spend to the minimum as it is.
CHANGSTER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 05:40 AM   #9
Garcia Bronco
Hokie since 1993
 

Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 46,773

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Tom Jackson
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taco John View Post
Dogs and cats living together! Mass hysteria!
But Lenny. You will have saved the lives of millions of registered voters.
Garcia Bronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 06:01 AM   #10
Atwater His Ass
Ring of Famer
 
Atwater His Ass's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,623

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

we need more threads about this since there isn't like a million billion already delineinating the specifics of an uncapped year.
Atwater His Ass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 06:30 AM   #11
BABronco
RP2012
 
BABronco's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,173

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Clady
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Atwater His Ass View Post
we need more threads about this since there isn't like a million billion already delineinating the specifics of an uncapped year.
yeah... and while were at it we could use some more whiny b****y nitpicking.
BABronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 06:43 AM   #12
Hercules Rockefeller
Ring of Famer
 
Hercules Rockefeller's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 16,222

Adopt-a-Bronco:
DJ Williams
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elway777 View Post
so we own the rights to marshall for another year.
2
Hercules Rockefeller is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 06:48 AM   #13
baja
It is what it Is.
 
baja's Avatar
 
Pay attention.

Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: in the present moment
Posts: 58,734

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Chase Vaughn
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cutthemdown View Post
Oakland not making money and Davis not rich by NFL owner standards.

But even with money if those teams finished in the playoffs they can't really sign anyone unless they lose FA. So you lose a star to sign a star makes little sense.

It could be good for Broncos though if we miss playoffs. We could then sign whoever we want.

In fact some big winning teams may not match offers on RFA or try to resign other big names because they need to lose a player to get into the market and target players they covet.

It really does sound like there are tons of angles us fans are ignorant or in the dark about.

Marshall may be better off getting what he can get now. Broncos might want to think about locking up Kuper as well.
Don't tell lex this he will root for the Broncos to lose and miss the playoffs.
baja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 06:50 AM   #14
baja
It is what it Is.
 
baja's Avatar
 
Pay attention.

Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: in the present moment
Posts: 58,734

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Chase Vaughn
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cutthemdown View Post
Just pointing out how it might not be the free for all you had talked about in some other threads.

Good input though.
I don't think he is sleeping well.
baja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 07:22 AM   #15
Taco John
24/7 Broncos
 
Taco John's Avatar
 
All Hail King Midas

Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 50,419

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Peyton Manning
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cutthemdown View Post
Just pointing out how it might not be the free for all you had talked about in some other threads.

Good input though.

What kind of man reads offense into a Ghostbusters reference?


And I still think that it's going to be relative pandimonium.
Taco John is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 07:46 AM   #16
TheElusiveKyleOrton
BOOM.
 
TheElusiveKyleOrton's Avatar
 
Touched By God

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Denver
Posts: 10,613
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by baja View Post
Don't tell lex this he will root for the Broncos to lose and miss the playoffs.
yeah, but he's going to do that anyway.
__________________
Nobody puts Jay-bee in the corner.
TheElusiveKyleOrton is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 08:21 AM   #17
TonyR
Franchise Poster
 
TonyR's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mid-Atlantic
Posts: 18,627
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThatOneDenverMooseGuy View Post
yeah, but he's going to do that anyway.
You beat me to it. As if he needs another reason to root against the Broncos.

But back to the topic at hand, my biggest concern would the the NFL turning into MLB. The few "haves" dominating the the league, that being the large market franchises and those with the free spending, billionaire owners. The Broncos would not fare very well in such a scenario.
TonyR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 09:19 AM   #18
broncosteven
Kranz Dictum
 
broncosteven's Avatar
 
Gene helping John figure out FA

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Tranquility Base
Posts: 34,315

Adopt-a-Bronco:
They'r all bums
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cutthemdown View Post
...
It really does sound like there are tons of angles us fans are ignorant or in the dark about.
...

This happens every year.
broncosteven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 11:34 AM   #19
cutthemdown
A verbis ad verbera
 
cutthemdown's Avatar
 
Zimm to HOF

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 36,489
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taco John View Post
What kind of man reads offense into a Ghostbusters reference?


And I still think that it's going to be relative pandimonium.
I missed that !!!
cutthemdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 11:36 AM   #20
cutthemdown
A verbis ad verbera
 
cutthemdown's Avatar
 
Zimm to HOF

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 36,489
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Atwater His Ass View Post
we need more threads about this since there isn't like a million billion already delineinating the specifics of an uncapped year.
Really because I had not heard the part about how playoff teams can not sign FA unless they lose FA's.

Then again then you are right the Oman never discusses something twice.

My bad.
cutthemdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 11:44 AM   #21
gyldenlove
Ring of Famer
 
gyldenlove's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Nęstved, DK
Posts: 10,888

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Spencer Larsen
Default

The 2 biggest rules in an uncapped year are:

1. No salary floor, you can spend as little as possible and the Glazers in Tampa and whoever owns the Cardinals are already looking forward to bringing you teams with total salaries of less than 50 million.

2. 25% raise cap, players can only increase their annual take by 25% compared to this year. So that means if you have a low salary this year, you are screwed for next year. This could actually make franchise tags somewhat tricky since for many players the tags would exceed the 25% rule and I believe that would make the tag salary lower.
gyldenlove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 11:55 AM   #22
BroncoMan4ever
Ring of Famer
 
BroncoMan4ever's Avatar
 
That's just like your opinion, man

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 13,219

Adopt-a-Bronco:
VIRGIL GREEN!!!
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cutthemdown View Post
so Bronco man you think it will get resolved before next off-season? I think you are the only one who does. It sure doesn't sound like they can iron out everything that soon.

The players union rep is now saying players may never agree to a cap again.
i just think at the latest it will be fixed after 1 uncapped year, because no one will want to endure another year. but i truly think before next season. uncapped year is a burden to the players and the players union should know that. the owners are also going to lose money

plus if an uncapped year does happen and lets say you are a Jaguars fan, you are going to be forced to sit through truly mediocre football as a small market team like that is definitely going to spend as little as possible on players, and because of that, revenue dollars from those teams will drop, and force big market teams to have to share their profits with them and have teams like Dallas and Washington bringing in less money. Jerry Jones is pissed how much he has to share now while the league is working well, he is going to want to kill someone when he has to share an even bigger chunk of his money.

no way will this last long if at all.
BroncoMan4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 11:58 AM   #23
Man-Goblin
Giving You The Business
 
Man-Goblin's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Huntersville, NC
Posts: 5,955

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Mister Cobble
Default

Biggest impact of no cap: every bad contract in the league will be teminated with no cap ramifications.

I still think there will be a lockout before we get there, tho.
Man-Goblin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 02:33 PM   #24
cutthemdown
A verbis ad verbera
 
cutthemdown's Avatar
 
Zimm to HOF

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 36,489
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BroncoMan4ever View Post
i just think at the latest it will be fixed after 1 uncapped year, because no one will want to endure another year. but i truly think before next season. uncapped year is a burden to the players and the players union should know that. the owners are also going to lose money

plus if an uncapped year does happen and lets say you are a Jaguars fan, you are going to be forced to sit through truly mediocre football as a small market team like that is definitely going to spend as little as possible on players, and because of that, revenue dollars from those teams will drop, and force big market teams to have to share their profits with them and have teams like Dallas and Washington bringing in less money. Jerry Jones is pissed how much he has to share now while the league is working well, he is going to want to kill someone when he has to share an even bigger chunk of his money.

no way will this last long if at all.

I agree because after the uncapped yr you will either get a new deal or a lockout. They can't just operate under the rules that will be in place next yr indefenitley.
cutthemdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 02:35 PM   #25
cutthemdown
A verbis ad verbera
 
cutthemdown's Avatar
 
Zimm to HOF

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 36,489
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gyldenlove View Post
The 2 biggest rules in an uncapped year are:

1. No salary floor, you can spend as little as possible and the Glazers in Tampa and whoever owns the Cardinals are already looking forward to bringing you teams with total salaries of less than 50 million.

2. 25% raise cap, players can only increase their annual take by 25% compared to this year. So that means if you have a low salary this year, you are screwed for next year. This could actually make franchise tags somewhat tricky since for many players the tags would exceed the 25% rule and I believe that would make the tag salary lower.

Didn't know that part of it thanks.

How do you see the playoff teams operating since they can't sign players unless they lose players? IMO it could mean all the good players on the good teams get resigned? or tagged? It may not make for much talent actually hitting the pool.
cutthemdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes



Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:35 AM.


Denver Broncos