The Orange Mane -  a Denver Broncos Fan Community  

Go Back   The Orange Mane - a Denver Broncos Fan Community > Orange Mane Discussion > Orange Mane Central Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Chat Room Mark Forums Read

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-08-2009, 10:42 AM   #1
RIP Darrent Williams
ludo21's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Glendale, AZ
Posts: 19,224

Paul Ernster
Default League going soft??

Recently retired NFL safety Rodney Harrison blasted the league a few months back, and his criticisms shouldn't be quickly forgotten. He called the NFL "soft." He claimed it had turned into a "pansy league." These were the kind of words that certainly will call attention to Harrison's newfound broadcasting career. But they were also comments that weren't too far off the mark.

Look, we all know the NFL still has plenty of tough guys. What it is losing, however, is the sense that the people who run the sport are completely in touch with the fundamental aspects of the game. That was apparent once again when the league made an eye-opening adjustment to the roughing-the-passer rule during the owners' meetings in March. It quickly became known as "The Tom Brady Rule," in reference to the New England Patriots' star signal-caller, and it was that legislation that so agitated Harrison.

State Of NFL Nation Polls
A weeklong look at the biggest questions facing the league.

Monday: Teams | Story
Tuesday: Players | AFC | NFC
Wednesday: Issues | Chadiha
Thursday: Experience
Friday: Future

The adjustment basically states that defenders who have been knocked to the ground must get back on their feet before tackling the quarterback. It's the league's attempt to avoid the type of lunging hit delivered by Kansas City Chiefs safety Bernard Pollard in September, the one that led to a season-ending knee injury for Brady. It's easy to see why the league wants to have such a rule on the books. It's also harder to think that this amendment doesn't temper the culture of a sport that always has been about brutality.

In fact, that rule change is one more example of why some players feel the league has softened too much. Pittsburgh Steelers Pro Bowl strong safety Troy Polamalu even complained last fall that the NFL "is becoming more and more [like] flag football, two-hand touch. We've really lost the essence of what real American football is about." Polamalu was upset after the Steelers received a rash of fines last season for everything from vicious blocks by wide receiver Hines Ward to taunting by former wide receiver Nate Washington. In all, four players were hit with $45,000 in fines at the time of Polamalu's comments.

Polamalu also suggested something that shouldn't be dismissed easily: that the league's obsession with heavy-handed discipline for overly aggressive play has more to do with money than safety. It's hard to argue against that. Just consider these comments from New England Patriots owner Bob Kraft after the league amended that roughing-the-passer rule: "What makes [the NFL] special is special players. It's like going to see a great movie and the star isn't in the movie. It's the same principle."

NFC West blog's Mike Sando writes about all things NFC West in his division blog.

Blog network: NFL Nation

That's not exactly true. The promotion of special players is how the NBA remade itself in the 1980s. The NFL, on the other hand, has always marketed itself as a team game; the ultimate game, as many have said. There have been plenty of teams that have prospered after losing key personnel to injuries -- the Patriots actually just missed last season's playoffs after going 11-5 following Brady's injury -- and that type of resilience is something that also makes the sport great.

What owners like Kraft can't understand is something that should be obvious to most NFL fans: This sport is about controlled violence. It's about an abundance of oversized men with ridiculous strength, speed and quickness crashing into each other during a 60-minute game. Injuries are going to happen in that kind of arena. It's the willingness of these players to compete with that risk that makes the sport so compelling in the first place.

That doesn't mean the NFL hasn't created some recent rules that have been good for player safety. It just means that the league has also done plenty of harm with its attempts to legislate the game. Look at what's happened to modern cornerbacks. It's nearly impossible for them to thrive consistently because they can't touch a wide receiver more than five yards behind the line of scrimmage.

The league had also been doing everything possible to protect quarterbacks long before amending the roughing-the-passer rule. Minnesota Vikings defensive end Jared Allen actually had to meet with commissioner Roger Goodell last season after Allen's hits on two quarterbacks -- Houston's Matt Schaub and Green Bay's Aaron Rodgers -- drew scrutiny from the league. Allen ultimately was fined $50,000 for the hits on Schaub, but the league didn't discipline him for a suspected helmet-to-helmet contact with Rodgers.

Still, his visit to the league office was an ominous indication of how the NFL powers that be want their players, especially those on defense, to behave. It's that kind of scrutiny that makes it harder for players to think their game isn't changing in ridiculous ways.

"We play a violent sport," Allen told local reporters last fall. "We know that and we willingly sign up for it. We don't ever purposely go out to hurt anybody, ever. I know for myself that I have the utmost respect for everybody who plays this sport. But at the same time, it's like you can't make rules to tame it down. This is what we do. We're grown men. We make the decisions to do what we do."

That really is the point of all this. Nobody denies that the game exacts a huge toll on the men who compete in it; all you have to do is look at the masses of retired players who have been crippled by it. But you also don't hear those same men complaining that the game was too harsh in their day. They take pride in their collective toughness. They know their combination of courage and conviction is what allowed them to play the game at the highest level in the first place.

That's why Harrison's assessment of what's been happening to the NFL isn't something that should be taken lightly. The culture of the game has been shifting in subtle ways, and that change is sapping a vital edge from the sport. The reality is that there's only so much that can be controlled on a football field. And if the league keeps trying to institute too many precautions, it will someday end up with a style of play even its own players might not recognize.


The "Tom Brady Rule" is dumb, too many rules are going to make it very difficult for defenses to do anything soon.
ludo21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 07-08-2009, 11:31 AM   #2
"Hoodie Jr"
watermock's Avatar
"Hug me!"

Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Hot Springs, Ouachitah
Posts: 76,813

Players like Lott, Smith, Atwater, Harrison wouldn't make the roster in the pussification of the NFL.

Or they would of been diminished.
watermock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2009, 03:10 PM   #3
Ring of Famer
FireFly's Avatar
The window is open!

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,788

All of the newer precautionary rules have been put into place to protect the players, but there is a fine line between doing that and making the game "soft".

It is football, noone is forcing them to play so imo let them play hard!

With that being said, you'll find that this process started years and years ago and isn't going to stop.
FireFly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2009, 03:52 PM   #4
Perennial Pro-bowler
KillerBronco#76's Avatar
"The Beast" From the east

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 898

My two favorite defensive players, Butkus and Deacon would be chased out of the league...
KillerBronco#76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2009, 04:10 PM   #5
A verbis ad verbera
cutthemdown's Avatar
Zimm to HOF

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 36,713

Originally Posted by watermock View Post
Players like Lott, Smith, Atwater, Harrison wouldn't make the roster in the pussification of the NFL.

Or they would of been diminished.
Atwater was usually bigger so he didn't helmet to helmet a lot, but he did get his forearms up into the chest and sometimes under the chin. Now Smith man, he was a straight missile with the crown of his helmet leading the way. Smith IMO had more crushing hits then Atwater did.

Smith just destroyed people game after game.
cutthemdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2009, 04:14 PM   #6
Rock-N-Roll Historian
Hogan11's Avatar
Let's take these SOB's out!!!!!!

Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: W.NY.B.C.
Posts: 21,000

Floyd Little

Not enough Bidness in today's NFL

Hogan11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2009, 04:44 PM   #7
Boss Man
Solid Starter

Join Date: May 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 237


i agree the league is defiantly going soft. The reason these guys get paid is to go out and take a physical risk. I mean this is meant to be a contact sport. Injuries are a part of the game, and imposing penalties such as these on the defenses hinders their ability to go 100% on a play without having to question if the will be penalized or not.**** is getting pathetic
Boss Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2009, 09:01 PM   #8
Ring of Famer
New to the Forum

Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 7,180


I'm kinda divided here with the rule changes with the defense. On the one side you don't want to see a players career or season ended b/c of nasty illegal hit. But at the same time, if there was one rule I'd like to see the NFL repeal.....and that would be not allowing the WR to be touched after 5 yards! In fact, change the rule back to where it was in 1980.
rastaman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2009, 10:05 PM   #9
Ring of Famer
BroncoMan4ever's Avatar
That's just like your opinion, man

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 13,295


Originally Posted by watermock View Post
Players like Lott, Smith, Atwater, Harrison wouldn't make the roster in the pussification of the NFL.

Or they would of been diminished.
a lot of HOF LB's and Safeties would have absolutely no place in the pussified NFL of today. they would either end up fined exorbitant amounts and that would lead to eventual suspensions and eventually out of the league.

i understand the desire of the league wanting to protect players from serious injury, but the league needs to understand, this is a contact sport and injuries happen.

can you imagine someone like Jack Tatum in this era of the NFL. the league would give him a lifetime ban for some of his hits. he would be called a cheap shot artist, rather than just a good intimidating Safety.

i mean how can a defensive player be expected to go out and give all he has, if in the back of his mind he knows if he hits a guy and the league doesn't like the hit he is going to get fined. the majority of these guys aren't making millions a year, and the fines suck for those guys.

Last edited by BroncoMan4ever; 07-08-2009 at 10:09 PM..
BroncoMan4ever is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2009, 12:06 AM   #10
Taco John
24/7 Broncos
Taco John's Avatar
All Hail King Midas

Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 50,481

Peyton Manning

Jack Tatum was a cheap shot artist. I hope the level of hell he burns in is the one where you eternally choke on your own vomit.
Taco John is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2009, 12:28 AM   #11
Ring of Famer
BroncoMan4ever's Avatar
That's just like your opinion, man

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 13,295


Originally Posted by Taco John View Post
Jack Tatum was a cheap shot artist. I hope the level of hell he burns in is the one where you eternally choke on your own vomit.
come on his most controversial hit where he paralyzed that NE receiver was a clean hit.

the point i was making, is that heavy hitters from older eras of football, Tatum, Ditka, and others would have no place in this current pussified version of the NFL

back when they played, they dropped the hammer on other guys, the fans loved it, and they went back to the sidelines and that was the end of it. now if someone has a questionable tackle on a play he is worried about fines, getting penalized, or suspended. it is just getting to be too pussed out in the NFL.
BroncoMan4ever is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2009, 12:45 AM   #12
Optimum Homo
Archer81's Avatar
Tactical Neck.

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 22,557

I think the rules overprotect the QB. I understand that for most teams the QB is one of the higher paid players, so I get why the NFL would want to protect the investment...but this is football. Why play if you cant take a hit?

Archer81 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2009, 06:08 AM   #13
Rocky Mountain Thunder
RMT's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: United States
Posts: 3,266

why is Polamalu complaining? the league passed a rule just for HIM banning players from tackling by the hair ... which, if outside the helmet SHOULD be considered part of one's uniform and fair game (in my opinion).
RMT is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:18 PM.

Denver Broncos