The Orange Mane -  a Denver Broncos Fan Community  

Go Back   The Orange Mane - a Denver Broncos Fan Community > Orange Mane Discussion > Orange Mane Central Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Chat Room Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-18-2009, 08:49 AM   #1
dbfan21
Floridian living in KS
 
dbfan21's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Wichita
Posts: 2,176

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Pat Bowlen
Default Orton-Simms competition likely pre-determined

Found this article on si.com. Not saying I agree with it...just thought I would share with the masses since it's Bronco-related. Enjoy!!


The NFL is supposed to be among the most objective places of employment around. If you can play, you can stay, as the saying goes. Or in regard to coaches, win and you can stay in. The best players should start, make the team, etc. Likewise, the best coaches should get the head jobs, coordinator roles, etc. Yet in an ultra-competitive industry, that isn't always the case. There are still a number of personnel decisions that are pre-ordained. Call it the theory of the self-fulfilling prophecy.

The latest example comes out of Denver, where Kyle Orton "won" the battle for the starting quarterback position with Chris Simms. Now there's a shocker. After the whole drawn out Jay Cutler fiasco, was there ever any doubt who Josh McDaniels was going to tab as his starting quarterback? The only way Orton was going to lose the job to Simms was if Orton played horrendous and Simms played amazing, which was not the case.

That the Broncos announced their decision in June, without the players ever putting on shoulder pads, indicates this was more of a reaffirmation of what they already thought, not a genuine, no-holds barred competition. Making a decision about any position based upon OTAs, where there are no "live" bullets and no real threat of a pass rush, is questionable at best. So much for the pace of those practices being at a tempo conducive to learning and not evaluation, per the Collective Bargaining Agreement.

Click link to see the rest...

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200...x.html?eref=T1
dbfan21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 06-18-2009, 08:52 AM   #2
rugbythug
Church Eyes.
 
rugbythug's Avatar
 
Salty Dog

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,071

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Mr. Miller
Default

IE) Humans coach sports.
rugbythug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009, 08:58 AM   #3
Man-Goblin
One Gap Penetrator
 
Man-Goblin's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Huntersville, NC
Posts: 6,076

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Connor Barth
Default

He makes this claim based on what? Does anyone really think the competition is over? The reason you name a QB now is so people STFU and stop asking about it. This notion that Orton was annointed the job simply because he was invloved in the Culter trade is ludicris.

If Simms goes out there and clearly outplays Orton in camp he'll get the job.
Man-Goblin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009, 08:59 AM   #4
Tombstone RJ
Ring of Famer
 
Tombstone RJ's Avatar
 
Old School

Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: In the Tetons!
Posts: 22,308

Adopt-a-Bronco:
WorrellWilliams
Default

Simms is a work in progress. Hell, he's been out of the game for like 3 years and he's just trying to get back into the flow of the game. Yah, he's got potential but due to his injury and the fact that he's not taken any snaps over a long period of time hampers his ability to step in and win the starting QB position.
Tombstone RJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009, 09:32 AM   #5
SonOfLe-loLang
Young Buck
 
SonOfLe-loLang's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 22,020

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Thunder (RIP)
Default

Well, no **** Orton was going to be the starting QB...but it wasn't like McDaniels put up a big tent and sold tickets to the GREATEST QB BATTLE ON EARTH. Why does this writer sound like he's been duped?
SonOfLe-loLang is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009, 09:41 AM   #6
SoDak Bronco
Lace em' up and lets go!!
 
SoDak Bronco's Avatar
 
Von Miller aka QB Killa

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 4,222

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Robert Ayers
Default

I also bet that Champ wins a starting spot..well no ****tt
SoDak Bronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009, 09:47 AM   #7
PRBronco
_never forget_
 
PRBronco's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2004
Location: Calgary
Posts: 4,391

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Vathquezth
Default

Haha what a ****ing retard. "omg the broncos determined ahead of time that they wanted the better qb to start...FIRE MCYOUNGHEADCOACH OMFG"
PRBronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009, 10:08 AM   #8
Smiling Assassin27
Helmet Tester
 
Smiling Assassin27's Avatar
 
Hurry Hurry

Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: In a van down by the river
Posts: 12,577

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Hemanuel Sandrs
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dbfan21 View Post
Found this article on si.com. Not saying I agree with it...just thought I would share with the masses since it's Bronco-related. Enjoy!!


The NFL is supposed to be among the most objective places of employment around. If you can play, you can stay, as the saying goes. Or in regard to coaches, win and you can stay in. The best players should start, make the team, etc. Likewise, the best coaches should get the head jobs, coordinator roles, etc. Yet in an ultra-competitive industry, that isn't always the case. There are still a number of personnel decisions that are pre-ordained. Call it the theory of the self-fulfilling prophecy.

The latest example comes out of Denver, where Kyle Orton "won" the battle for the starting quarterback position with Chris Simms. Now there's a shocker. After the whole drawn out Jay Cutler fiasco, was there ever any doubt who Josh McDaniels was going to tab as his starting quarterback? The only way Orton was going to lose the job to Simms was if Orton played horrendous and Simms played amazing, which was not the case.

That the Broncos announced their decision in June, without the players ever putting on shoulder pads, indicates this was more of a reaffirmation of what they already thought, not a genuine, no-holds barred competition. Making a decision about any position based upon OTAs, where there are no "live" bullets and no real threat of a pass rush, is questionable at best. So much for the pace of those practices being at a tempo conducive to learning and not evaluation, per the Collective Bargaining Agreement.

Click link to see the rest...

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200...x.html?eref=T1
McD has already said that Orton has to keep the job. Somebody has to be #1 going into camp. Here's a novel idea--maybe Orton really performed better than Simms. Nah, couldn't be.
Smiling Assassin27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009, 11:34 AM   #9
bronco_boi_5280
Solid Starter
 
bronco_boi_5280's Avatar
 
The Birdman Flies

Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 246

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Chris Andersen
Default

What's interesting in that article is how it goes on to talk about (original poster did not post, click link) how offensive linemen could be protected and made to look good.

2 things that came to my mind;
1) We didn't do that with Clady, did we? He was on an island so to speak, wasn't he?
2) If this is true, explain Robert Gallery?
bronco_boi_5280 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009, 11:47 AM   #10
meangene
Ring of Famer
 
meangene's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,093
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dbfan21 View Post
Found this article on si.com.
Say no more. The only self-fulfilling prophecy is their skewing of facts to make a story.
meangene is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009, 11:53 AM   #11
DenverBrit
Just hanging out.
 
DenverBrit's Avatar
 
Got a breath mint??

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Denver
Posts: 12,755

Adopt-a-Bronco:
The Team
Default

.......and in other news.

9. Denver's decision

Warning — I am actually going to write something positive about the Denver Broncos and coach Josh McDaniels.

I applaud him for naming Kyle Orton his starting quarterback and not faking a quarterback competition between Orton and Chris Simms.

When you have two guys splitting the reps with the first team when you know the ultimate conclusion, it does nothing for a new quarterback trying to establish a rapport with his offensive line and receivers.

Now Orton can establish leadership in the locker room and on the practice field.

Good job by McDaniels. You know, with the exception of trading away his franchise quarterback, a move that set Denver back years.

Now if they can only make Brandon Marshall happy ...

http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/9...-playoff-bound
DenverBrit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009, 12:27 PM   #12
BroncoBuff
***************
 
BroncoBuff's Avatar
 
Playing for January

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 26,126

Adopt-a-Bronco:
MALIK+QUANTERUS
Default

If you recall, it did seem odd they named Orton the starter just the day after McD said otherwise.

The article is correct, it's strange they name a starter before the pads even go on. But it McD's decision, whenever he makes it.

Too bad for Chris, though.
BroncoBuff is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009, 12:48 PM   #13
Popps
It's so easy
 
Popps's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 29,774
Default

Wow, did Chris Simms' mom write this article? Is this guy serious?

Beyond that, he's said that he's only the starter "for now," and was simply a bit further ahead in learning the system. Not a huge shocker, considering he's played in a similar system in college.

He also made it clear that the job could change hands if competition played out that way.

Honestly, what the **** is with the conspiracy theorists and the Denver Broncos. It's just football, folks. Get a grip.
Popps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009, 12:55 PM   #14
BroncoBuff
***************
 
BroncoBuff's Avatar
 
Playing for January

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 26,126

Adopt-a-Bronco:
MALIK+QUANTERUS
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Popps View Post
It's just football, folks. Get a grip.
That's definitely a lesson you should learn
BroncoBuff is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009, 12:58 PM   #15
outdoor_miner
Ring of Famer
 
outdoor_miner's Avatar
 
New to the Forum

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,165

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BroncoBuff View Post
If you recall, it did seem odd they named Orton the starter just the day after McD said otherwise.

The article is correct, it's strange they name a starter before the pads even go on. But it McD's decision, whenever he makes it.

Too bad for Chris, though.
Aaaargh!!!

He did not say otherwise! Give me one quote where he said this!!!

It was Mike Klis's opinion that they were in "no rush" to name a starting quarterback... I will gladly eat crow if you can produce anything that directly states they were not going to name a starter.



(ps - my outrage is fake. )
outdoor_miner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009, 01:29 PM   #16
BroncoBuff
***************
 
BroncoBuff's Avatar
 
Playing for January

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 26,126

Adopt-a-Bronco:
MALIK+QUANTERUS
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by outdoor_miner View Post
Aaaargh!!!

He did not say otherwise! Give me one quote where he said this!!!

It was Mike Klis's opinion that they were in "no rush" to name a starting quarterback... I will gladly eat crow if you can produce anything that directly states they were not going to name a starter.



(ps - my outrage is fake. )
You are technically correct, the statement itself came from the reporter.

She did not have direct quotes specifically to that effect, but I just can't
imagine she would make that leap without having some understanding
elsewhere in the interview that this was true.

Either way, I think the article is correct ... it was Orton's position from the
start based on Cutler-gate. Now it's Simms job to out-play Orton in pre-season.

Won't be easy though ... he could outplay him somewhat - even decisively -
but still lose out. To win the job now, now that Orton is the named starter,
Simms will have to hope Orton falters in some demonstrable way, and I
doubt that will happen.
BroncoBuff is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009, 01:35 PM   #17
gyldenlove
Ring of Famer
 
gyldenlove's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Næstved, DK
Posts: 11,209

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Spencer Larsen
Default

Did anyone honestly believe that this was an actual battle? I am pretty confident that even Simms knew that the QB position was Orton's to lose.

Some sports writers should just write about golf or some such when there is no football being played so we can avoid these completely meaningless pieces.
gyldenlove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009, 01:44 PM   #18
DenverBrit
Just hanging out.
 
DenverBrit's Avatar
 
Got a breath mint??

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Denver
Posts: 12,755

Adopt-a-Bronco:
The Team
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BroncoBuff View Post
If you recall, it did seem odd they named Orton the starter just the day after McD said otherwise.

The article is correct, it's strange they name a starter before the pads even go on. But it McD's decision, whenever he makes it.

Too bad for Chris, though.
Whoa, that never happened.
DenverBrit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009, 01:52 PM   #19
outdoor_miner
Ring of Famer
 
outdoor_miner's Avatar
 
New to the Forum

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,165

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BroncoBuff View Post
You are technically correct, the statement itself came from the reporter.

She did not have direct quotes specifically to that effect, but I just can't imagine she would make that leap without having some understanding elsewhere in the interview that this was true.
I disagree with this (and it is complete conjecture on your part), but it doesn't really matter. Just seems like you are taking a negative slant on the situation because you don't like McDaniels. If Jones (or Klis - not sure who wrote the article) had a direct quote, I think he or she would have used it. The Denver press clearly doesn't like McDaniels. If they had a direct quote to throw in his face after he named Orton the starter, I am sure they would have used it. They would delight in catching him in a "lie".

Quote:
Either way, I think the article is correct ... it was Orton's position from the start based on Cutler-gate. Now it's Simms job to out-play Orton in pre-season.
I don't disagree with this. It was reported that one of the big reasons we traded with Chicago was because of Orton. So, I have no illusions that Orton was not the leader in the competition from the get go. He was the "favorite" to win the position.

What I do disagree with is that there is anything sinister about this. There was a competition... One guy may have started with a lead, but that doesn't mean that it wasn't an open competition. And if practice confirmed that Orton was superior, why hesitate to name him the starter? I don't care that it was no-contact practice. If one guy is clearly superior to the other, why delay? My guess is that Orton is mentally far ahead of Simms... Now, that is conjecture on my part. But, McDaniels wants a guy in full command of the offense running the show. Simms even sort of alluded to that in one of the articles:

http://www.denverpost.com/broncos/ci_12586639
Quote:
"He mentally probably picked up a few things a little quicker than I did."
outdoor_miner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009, 03:07 PM   #20
Drek
Ring of Famer
 
Drek's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,334
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BroncoBuff View Post
You are technically correct, the statement itself came from the reporter.

She did not have direct quotes specifically to that effect, but I just can't
imagine she would make that leap without having some understanding
elsewhere in the interview that this was true.

Either way, I think the article is correct ... it was Orton's position from the
start based on Cutler-gate. Now it's Simms job to out-play Orton in pre-season.

Won't be easy though ... he could outplay him somewhat - even decisively -
but still lose out. To win the job now, now that Orton is the named starter,
Simms will have to hope Orton falters in some demonstrable way, and I
doubt that will happen.
You really think that Buff?

That McDaniels would take even a microscopic downgrade at QB just to play the guy he got in return for Cutler? He wants to win and he knows if he does nothing else matters. He isn't going to sacrifice even the slightest hair of production at any position if he can help it.
Drek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009, 03:20 PM   #21
BroncoMan4ever
Ring of Famer
 
BroncoMan4ever's Avatar
 
That's just like your opinion, man

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 13,509

Adopt-a-Bronco:
VIRGIL GREEN!!!
Default

it truly didn't matter when Orton was named starter. he is better than Simms and has more recent playing and starting experience. naming him starter this early is just a way to have his confidence high heading into camp and the season.
BroncoMan4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009, 03:33 PM   #22
BroncoBuff
***************
 
BroncoBuff's Avatar
 
Playing for January

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 26,126

Adopt-a-Bronco:
MALIK+QUANTERUS
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DenverBrit View Post
Whoa, that never happened.
Accordingly to Lindsay Jones it did happen. But like I said, she could have been wrong.


Quote:
Originally Posted by outdoor_miner
I disagree with this (and it is complete conjecture on your part), but it doesn't really matter. Just seems like you are taking a negative slant on the situation because you don't like McDaniels. If Jones (or Klis - not sure who wrote the article) had a direct quote, I think he or she would have used it. The Denver press clearly doesn't like McDaniels.
Actually my post you responded to there had no conjecture in it ... I merely pointed out that Lindsay Jones' article the day before Orton was named starter was slugged "McD in no hurry to name starter," and as I said, even though she had no direct quotes to that effect, Josh did saying something like "we're pleased that these two guys are competing and pushing each other, that will only make them better." And I don't dislike McD as a coach - this is a coaching funcion. I dislike McD's front office perfromance, I think I've been pretty specific about both those points. Actually, I'm pretty damned excited about this offense of his ... can't wait.

And while I'm not sure the Denver media dislikes McD, I'm not in Denver, so I'll defer to you on that. I do know Woody hasn't exactly embraced him yet



Quote:
Originally Posted by Drek
You really think that Buff?

That McDaniels would take even a microscopic downgrade at QB just to play the guy he got in return for Cutler? He wants to win and he knows if he does nothing else matters. He isn't going to sacrifice even the slightest hair of production at any position if he can help it.
Too much is being made of this I think, let me repeat: Josh can name a starter whenever he likes, that's his job. And I'm quite certain Orton has outplayed Simms thusfar (although that article raises a fairly good point that they haven't even gone full speed yet). I dunno, I just like Simms. But it's really not that big of a deal.

My reference to "Simms will have to decisively outplay Orton to win the job," actually I think that's basically true. With any player as an incumbent starter, the backup has to win the job ... he can't merely come close.
BroncoBuff is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009, 03:56 PM   #23
DenverBrit
Just hanging out.
 
DenverBrit's Avatar
 
Got a breath mint??

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Denver
Posts: 12,755

Adopt-a-Bronco:
The Team
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BroncoBuff View Post
Accordingly to Lindsay Jones it did happen. But like I said, she could have been wrong.
Buff, Jones wrote a headline and gave an opinion that is not supported by anything McD said in the same article.....or at any other time.

Her headline.
Quote:
McDaniels in no hurry to name No. 1 QB
Her personal opinion, unsupported by any statement from the HC
Quote:
In reality, McDaniels seems in no rush to name a leader in the quest to replace Jay Cutler.
It was poor journalism on a slow news day.
Events proved Lindsey was wrong.

http://www.denverpost.com/broncos/ci_12581252
DenverBrit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009, 04:08 PM   #24
Atlas
Draft Defense Early&Often
 
Atlas's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 18,372
Default

Orton-Simms............. Wow, the Plummer/Griese years have returned.
Atlas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009, 05:43 PM   #25
Popps
It's so easy
 
Popps's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 29,774
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlas View Post
Orton-Simms............. Wow, the Plummer/Griese years have returned.
Yea, that would suck if we ended up on the doorstep of a SB again.

I hope that doesn't happen.

Better that we stay in the crap-house with a .500 record, huh?

I mean, when you're .500 and missing the playoffs... you NEVER make any changes. God forbid you tinker with that kind of chemistry.
Popps is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes



Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:29 PM.


Denver Broncos