The Orange Mane -  a Denver Broncos Fan Community  

Go Back   The Orange Mane - a Denver Broncos Fan Community > Orange Mane Discussion > Orange Mane Central Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Chat Room Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-16-2009, 10:01 AM   #1
Bronco Rob
Ring of Famer
 
Bronco Rob's Avatar
 
The Alpha & The Omega

Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,772

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Kush & Irsay
Default The good and the bad in the AFC West

Earlier this offseason we looked at the progress being made by the AFC West teams. With the draft in the books and all four rosters virtually set (other than a few tweaks) for training camp, here is a major reason for optimism and a major reason for pessimism for each AFC West team:



Denver Broncos

Reason to be optimistic: The running game should be strong. The team drafted Georgia's Knowshon Moreno with the No. 12 pick despite a crowded backfield.

It is clear Denver is going to be a running team after the Jay Cutler trade. It looks like Kyle Orton, acquired in the Cutler trade, will lead the offense, but the run will set up the pass in Denver.

New Denver coach Josh McDaniels said that Moreno can be a three-down back. McDaniels also said he believes Moreno can help the entire offense. Watch for Denver to try to incorporate veteran pickups J.J. Arrington and Correll Buckhalter and perhaps holdover Peyton Hillis into the running game.

Each player offers a different aspect to the offense. With a strong offensive line and good receivers and tight ends, Denver's offense has a chance to succeed. And it will begin with the run.

Reason to be pessimistic: The front seven is weak.

It was Denver's biggest question mark going into the draft and it remains the biggest issue afterward. With 10 picks, Denver dedicated only one pick to the front seven: Tennessee's Robert Ayers at No. 18. And the team really doesn't know what it is going to do with him. He'll probably be a hybrid defensive end-linebacker.

The Broncos really needed a legitimate defensive lineman as they transition to a 3-4 scheme. If Ayers is going to bounce around, he isn't the anchor the team needs. The linebacking crew had a chance to be decent, but the front three is going to be very inexperienced and very unintimidating with the trio Kenny Peterson, Matthias Askew and Ronnie Fields having a chance to be the starters.



Kansas City Chiefs

Reason to be optimistic: I am not thrilled with the trade of Tony Gonzalez to Atlanta, but the offense has some decent pieces.

There is good leadership on the unit and it starts with new head coach Todd Haley. He proved as the offensive coordinator in Arizona that he is an innovator and a leader.

Then there is new quarterback Matt Cassel, who was stolen from New England along with linebacker Mike Vrabel for a second-round pick. Cassel has yet to prove he is anything more than a one-year wonder. But he will be put in a position to succeed in Kansas City and will be running a similar system to what he ran with the Patriots. If Cassel can develop a fast chemistry with receiver Dwayne Bowe, the offensive line comes together and Larry Johnson, assuming he is on the team, still has something in the tank, the offense has a chance to decent.

Reason to be pessimistic: Statistically speaking, the Chiefs are the worst pass-rushing defense the NFL has ever seen. Kansas City set an NFL record for the fewest sacks in 2008 with 10.

One would think finding pass-rushers would be a priority through free agency and the draft, but the Chiefs have been very quiet. Yes, they added defensive end Tyson Jackson with the No. 3 pick in the draft. However, Jackson is known as a better run-stuffer than a pass-rusher. Thus, on paper, little has been done to improve an anemic pass rush.



Oakland Raiders

Reason to be optimistic: The foundation to most successful offenses is a supreme running game. This gives Oakland a chance to break a six-year downturn. The Raiders have potentially one of the most dynamic running games in the NFL. They certainly have one of the most varied running attacks in the league.

The three-headed monster of Darren McFadden, Justin Fargas and Michael Bush will keep teams off balance. McFadden is a game-breaker who is most effective if he is not overused. Fargas is a tough-yardage getter. He is very rugged. Bush is good in short-yardage situations and he is explosive. None of these players will carry an offense alone, but together they can do some damage.

If this group can stay healthy (which has been an issue), it will give Oakland a strong identity on offense.

Reason to be pessimistic: While the running game is looking primed in Oakland, the passing game could hold back the offense.

Last week during the Raiders' minicamp, quarterback JaMarcus Russell suggested that Oakland's offense will be relying on the run first. That's all well and good, but Russell needs to help the running game or defenses will concentrate on stopping the run and neutralize Oakland's biggest strength.

Russell has been inconsistent in his young career and he must make strides this season. There is no questioning Russell has some skills, but he needs to do a better job of showing it.

He also needs help from his receivers. The team drafted Darrius Heyward-Bey with the No. 7 pick to make an immediate impact. However, if his collegiate inconsistencies continue, he may not be able to help right away.



San Diego Chargers

Reason to be optimistic: It's simple: The Chargers are the best team in the division -- by a long shot. That's why the Chargers should feel good about themselves.

Because of all of the upheaval with the other three AFC West teams this offseason, San Diego is entering 2009 bigger favorites than last season.

San Diego did very little tinkering this offseason, but it did add some interesting pieces on defense in the form of linebackers Kevin Burnett (free agency) and Larry English (first-round pick in the draft). San Diego didn't need much to continue to have the best roster in the division.

Reason to be pessimistic: If there is a chance for San Diego to falter in this division, it will be the pass defense. The pass defense struggled for much of last season, even though it did improve some when Ron Rivera became the defensive coordinator.

Improving the pass defense has been the focus of the entire team in 2009. San Diego general manager A.J. Smith said at the team's minicamp earlier this month that if the pass rush doesn't improve, the Chargers, who had to rally at the end of the season to win the AFC West title in 2008, could struggle again.

Still, the team is hopeful that the return of Shawne Merriman and the drafting of English will help the pass rush and, in turn, help the secondary.




http://myespn.go.com/blogs/nflnation...-AFC-West.html
Bronco Rob is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 05-16-2009, 11:27 AM   #2
Rabb
No Luca, No!
 
Rabb's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,705

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Dynamite Monkey
Default

Quote:
It is clear Denver is going to be a running team after the Jay Cutler trade. It looks like Kyle Orton, acquired in the Cutler trade, will lead the offense, but the run will set up the pass in Denver.
fine with me, worked pretty well in the 90s
Quote:
Watch for Denver to try to incorporate veteran pickups J.J. Arrington and Correll Buckhalter and perhaps holdover Peyton Hillis into the running game.
perhaps?

he ****ing well better be incorporated into the running game, dude gives 150% every touch
Rabb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2009, 12:31 PM   #3
footstepsfrom#27
helmet to helmet hitter
 
footstepsfrom#27's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 16,145

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Joe Mays
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bronco Rob View Post
The linebacking crew had a chance to be decent, but the front three is going to be very inexperienced and very unintimidating with the trio Kenny Peterson, Matthias Askew and Ronnie Fields having a chance to be the starters.
Please. Everyone on the roster "has a chance" to become a starter. Who thinks these 3 will wind up starting?
footstepsfrom#27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2009, 01:03 PM   #4
Merlin
Ring of Famer
 

Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,797
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rabbmasterflash View Post
fine with me, worked pretty well in the 90s
perhaps?
Did you actually compare this team with the 90s team that had some guy called Elway
Merlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2009, 02:55 PM   #5
bronco610
OLD FART
 
bronco610's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Keller, TX
Posts: 1,839

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Woodyard
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Merlin View Post
Did you actually compare this team with the 90s team that had some guy called Elway
At the risk of being shot down in flames, I have watched Elways last 2 years extensively and he was not the rocket arm he had appeared to be earlier in his career. I loved John and believe he was the best QB of all time but.... In the super bowl win years most NFL QB's could have made the same throws. So if the run game is there, the defense is decent (big if), and McD is what most pat fans and some of the people here believe (POPPs) we may be pretty good and actually stand a chance.
bronco610 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2009, 03:09 PM   #6
Rabb
No Luca, No!
 
Rabb's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,705

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Dynamite Monkey
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Merlin View Post
Did you actually compare this team with the 90s team that had some guy called Elway
um, no I didn't compare them I said it worked well then so why not
Rabb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2009, 03:26 PM   #7
BroncoBuff
***************
 
BroncoBuff's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 25,997

Adopt-a-Bronco:
MALIK+QUANTERUS
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bronco Rob View Post
the front three is going to be very inexperienced and very unintimidating with the trio Kenny Peterson, Matthias Askew and Ronnie Fields having a chance to be the starters.
Matthias Askew has five - count them, FIVE - tackles and zero starts in his two year career. To speculate he will start ahead of Marcus Thomas is foolish beyond measure.

And to write in reference to Robert Ayers, "the team really doesn't know what it is going to do with him," is irresponsible beyond measure.

The idea we "don't know what to do" with the guy we just drafted at #18 is pretty stupid.
BroncoBuff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2009, 03:40 PM   #8
Popps
It's so easy
 
Popps's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 29,804
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by footstepsfrom#27 View Post
Please. Everyone on the roster "has a chance" to become a starter. Who thinks these 3 will wind up starting?
I wouldn't be shocked to see Fields and Peterson listed as "starters" on game day.

But, I believe McD when he says they'll be throwing a lot of different looks at teams. I think guys like Thomas and potentially Powell will shift around on the line, and won't be surprised to see 4 down linemen fairly often.
Popps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2009, 04:05 PM   #9
maher_tyler
Ring of Famer
 
maher_tyler's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: AZ
Posts: 6,338

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Champ Bailey
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Popps View Post
I wouldn't be shocked to see Fields and Peterson listed as "starters" on game day.

But, I believe McD when he says they'll be throwing a lot of different looks at teams. I think guys like Thomas and potentially Powell will shift around on the line, and won't be surprised to see 4 down linemen fairly often.
Yep...we just dont have the pieces to run the 3-4 on every down...look for us to run a 3-4 look on passing downs and to bring in a nickleback on 3rd and long.
maher_tyler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2009, 06:17 PM   #10
footstepsfrom#27
helmet to helmet hitter
 
footstepsfrom#27's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 16,145

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Joe Mays
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Popps View Post
I wouldn't be shocked to see Fields and Peterson listed as "starters" on game day.
Why?
footstepsfrom#27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2009, 08:21 PM   #11
Cito Pelon
Been there, didn't get it
 
Cito Pelon's Avatar
 
Not2Shabby County Seat

Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AFC Championshipville, NotTooShabby County
Posts: 16,535

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Slim Shabby
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Popps View Post
I wouldn't be shocked to see Fields and Peterson listed as "starters" on game day.

But, I believe McD when he says they'll be throwing a lot of different looks at teams. I think guys like Thomas and potentially Powell will shift around on the line, and won't be surprised to see 4 down linemen fairly often.
I agree. The media assumes the 3-4 is a foregone conclusion, but I don't buy it. Sure, they've been experimenting, but I think this is a better 4-3 D than a 3-4.

Now, IF Elvis, Moss, Ayers, DJ, whomever can adapt to the 3-4 OLB role in TC we might see more 3-4 than I'm thinking right now. There's some big if's right now about going to 3-4 primarily. We'll just have to wait and see what the D looks like as they experiment with the 3-4 in TC and preseason.
Cito Pelon is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes



Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:00 PM.


Denver Broncos