The Orange Mane -  a Denver Broncos Fan Community  

Go Back   The Orange Mane - a Denver Broncos Fan Community > Orange Mane Discussion > Orange Mane Central Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Chat Room Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-26-2009, 01:31 PM   #1
NFLBRONCO
Ring of Famer
 
NFLBRONCO's Avatar
 
Go Nuggets Go Lakers

Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lafayette Colorado
Posts: 8,365
Default Denver's yearly phobia of drafting DL

What is it with Denver and avoiding DL this year after year. Our DL has been awful forever would it hurt to at least TRY a player or two in theis draft. If they bust they bust but, at least the attempt was made to improve a weak link. I think most fans would just be pleased with effort of DL instead of doing nothing this year.

I understand this draft is weak at DL but, we are so bad on DL I don't think it would hurt bolstering it with one or two selections.

Last edited by NFLBRONCO; 04-26-2009 at 01:45 PM..
NFLBRONCO is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 04-26-2009, 01:33 PM   #2
rugbythug
Church Eyes.
 
rugbythug's Avatar
 
Salty Dog

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,073

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Mr. Miller
Default

Go back and look at the draft 2 years ago.
rugbythug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2009, 01:34 PM   #3
BroncoBuff
***************
 
BroncoBuff's Avatar
 
Playing for January

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 26,127

Adopt-a-Bronco:
MALIK+QUANTERUS
Default

2007 - 3 out of 4 picks.

I agree this year is crazy-D-line-phobic ... but there's no history
BroncoBuff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2009, 01:35 PM   #4
barryr
Ring of Famer
 
New to the Forum

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,967

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

What the hell are you talking about? They have drafted DL high in the draft, yet they don't seem to pan out. Bad choices and poor position coaching on the DL has been the problem.
barryr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2009, 01:38 PM   #5
barryr
Ring of Famer
 
New to the Forum

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,967

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

Not just Moss, Crowder, and Thomas, but the Broncos under Shahanan also drafted Dorsett Davis in the 3rd round, Nick Eason in the 3rd round, Paul Toveissi in the 2nd or 3rd, and Hayworth in the 3rd. And I remember some stiff named Campbell from Florida in the 3rd round several years ago too. Other than Hayworth, who left in free agency, has these guys been considered solid picks to this point?
barryr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2009, 01:39 PM   #6
Kaylore
Because I am better
 
Kaylore's Avatar
 
Everything

Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ceti Alpha V
Posts: 47,054

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Pat Bowlen
Default

This year was different because it was one of the worst defensive tackle drafts in years.
Kaylore is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2009, 01:40 PM   #7
SoCalBronco
Nixonite
 
SoCalBronco's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Arcadia, CA
Posts: 37,005

Adopt-a-Bronco:
D.J. Williams
Default

It was an abomination and an embarassment of biblical proportions. This was the biggest problem. You can't p***Y out of it by saying "oh well, we didnt like who was there when we picked". That's bull****. Get over it. You work with the talent. You give up an extra third to get Raji, since you are willing to piss away everything else. Or you give up an extra third to get Brace. Or you just draft the 3-4 skill set players in the later rounds EVEN if you aren't totally in love with them. There's dozens and dozens of DL prospects. You HAVE to find someone you can at least work with. Don't tell me there's no one at all that they feel will fit their system. If that's the case, then change the ****ing system. They're NFL coaches for pete's sake. They're supposed to work with flawed talent and make them useful and help to cover up their flaws. Anyone can work with a perfect prototype prospect. They don't grow on trees. You work with what's available and make them better. That's what a good coach, does. You don't sit back and cry that no one really fits or is really that great. It's not like your spending a first on them. It's Day Two. It's not going to kill you if they dont pan out but you have to at least TRY to get some 3-4 DL prospects in here and work with them. They failed in that task. They utterly failed. They are a failure. What's wrong with bringing in Scott and working with him? What's wrong with bringing in Taylor and working through his flaws? How bout bringing in Hill and giving him some pro coaching to help him out? We have NOTHING on the line. NOTHING that fits the 3-4. They did a nice job of addressing the SOLB spot but nothing on the line. They're asking for suicide if they expect Thomas, Peterson and either Powell or Fields to keep people off LBs. They're going to get thrown in the LB's laps all game every game. You don't have one guy there that people are scared of. There isn't one guy there that commands a double team. They needed to address it, even with flawed prospects. If they didn't want to address it high, then they could have addressed it later, with little risk since it was Day Two.

The LBs are going to have a HELL of a time trying to play in front of this group. The coaches set them up to fail. They set them up to fail. They needed help. We needed help so bad in that area. And we could have had it...even if the help wasnt perfect. It's ok...BEGGARS CAN'T BE CHOOSERS.
__________________
SoCalBronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2009, 01:40 PM   #8
BroncoInferno
Ring of Famer
 

Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 13,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaylore View Post
This year was different because it was one of the worst defensive tackle drafts in years.
Exactly. Why is this so hard to understand? We are drafting where the value is.
BroncoInferno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2009, 01:41 PM   #9
NFLBRONCO
Ring of Famer
 
NFLBRONCO's Avatar
 
Go Nuggets Go Lakers

Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lafayette Colorado
Posts: 8,365
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by barryr View Post
Not just Moss, Crowder, and Thomas, but the Broncos under Shahanan also drafted Dorsett Davis in the 3rd round, Nick Eason in the 3rd round, Paul Toveissi in the 2nd or 3rd, and Hayworth in the 3rd. Other than Hayworth, who left in free agency, has these guys been considered solid picks to this point?
I totally forget about Moss and Crowder lol. FA I understand.

Last edited by NFLBRONCO; 04-26-2009 at 01:46 PM..
NFLBRONCO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2009, 01:46 PM   #10
Ambiguous
Ask me about my title
 
Ambiguous's Avatar
 
Go fsck yourself San Diego.

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,888

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Von Miller
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SoCalBronco View Post
It was an abomination and an embarassment of biblical proportions. This was the biggest problem. You can't p***Y out of it by saying "oh well, we didnt like who was there when we picked". That's bull****. Get over it. You work with the talent. You give up an extra third to get Raji, since you are willing to piss away everything else. Or you give up an extra third to get Brace. Or you just draft the 3-4 skill set players in the later rounds EVEN if you aren't totally in love with them. There's dozens and dozens of DL prospects. You HAVE to find someone you can at least work with. Don't tell me there's no one at all that they feel will fit their system. If that's the case, then change the ****ing system. They're NFL coaches for pete's sake. They're supposed to work with flawed talent and make them useful and help to cover up their flaws. Anyone can work with a perfect prototype prospect. They don't grow on trees. You work with what's available and make them better. That's what a good coach, does. You don't sit back and cry that no one really fits or is really that great. It's not like your spending a first on them. It's Day Two. It's not going to kill you if they dont pan out but you have to at least TRY to get some 3-4 DL prospects in here and work with them. They failed in that task. They utterly failed. They are a failure. What's wrong with bringing in Scott and working with him? What's wrong with bringing in Taylor and working through his flaws? How bout bringing in Hill and giving him some pro coaching to help him out? We have NOTHING on the line. NOTHING that fits the 3-4. They did a nice job of addressing the SOLB spot but nothing on the line. They're asking for suicide if they expect Thomas, Peterson and either Powell or Fields to keep people off LBs. They're going to get thrown in the LB's laps all game every game. You don't have one guy there that people are scared of. There isn't one guy there that commands a double team. They needed to address it, even with flawed prospects. If they didn't want to address it high, then they could have addressed it later, with little risk since it was Day Two.

The LBs are going to have a HELL of a time trying to play in front of this group. The coaches set them up to fail. They set them up to fail. They needed help. We needed help so bad in that area. And we could have had it...even if the help wasnt perfect. It's ok...BEGGARS CAN'T BE CHOOSERS.
I think I can read in between lines here... SoCal is not impressed with the draft this year.
Ambiguous is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2009, 01:47 PM   #11
BroncoInferno
Ring of Famer
 

Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 13,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SoCalBronco View Post
It was an abomination and an embarassment of biblical proportions. This was the biggest problem. You can't p***Y out of it by saying "oh well, we didnt like who was there when we picked". That's bull****. Get over it. You work with the talent. You give up an extra third to get Raji, since you are willing to piss away everything else. Or you give up an extra third to get Brace. Or you just draft the 3-4 skill set players in the later rounds EVEN if you aren't totally in love with them. There's dozens and dozens of DL prospects. You HAVE to find someone you can at least work with. Don't tell me there's no one at all that they feel will fit their system. If that's the case, then change the ****ing system. They're NFL coaches for pete's sake. They're supposed to work with flawed talent and make them useful and help to cover up their flaws. Anyone can work with a perfect prototype prospect. They don't grow on trees. You work with what's available and make them better. That's what a good coach, does. You don't sit back and cry that no one really fits or is really that great. It's not like your spending a first on them. It's Day Two. It's not going to kill you if they dont pan out but you have to at least TRY to get some 3-4 DL prospects in here and work with them. They failed in that task. They utterly failed. They are a failure. What's wrong with bringing in Scott and working with him? What's wrong with bringing in Taylor and working through his flaws? How bout bringing in Hill and giving him some pro coaching to help him out? We have NOTHING on the line. NOTHING that fits the 3-4. They did a nice job of addressing the SOLB spot but nothing on the line. They're asking for suicide if they expect Thomas, Peterson and either Powell or Fields to keep people off LBs. They're going to get thrown in the LB's laps all game every game. You don't have one guy there that people are scared of. There isn't one guy there that commands a double team. They needed to address it, even with flawed prospects. If they didn't want to address it high, then they could have addressed it later, with little risk since it was Day Two.

The LBs are going to have a HELL of a time trying to play in front of this group. The coaches set them up to fail. They set them up to fail. They needed help. We needed help so bad in that area. And we could have had it...even if the help wasnt perfect. It's ok...BEGGARS CAN'T BE CHOOSERS.
Jax did not want to trade the pick after Monroe fell in their lap. It would have certainly cost more than a 3rd to entice them. You can't just say, "well, we should have traded up" as if mere desire can make it happen. That's crap. You have to have a willing team who will do the deal at a reasonable price.

Second, this notion of yours that you draft out of need regardless of how you feel about the players is one of the worst, most ill-formed posts you've ever made. Picking based on need over BPA is ALWAYS a bad idea. We've seen it happen time and again. You draft where the value is. This draft is one of the WORST drafts for DTs in recent memory. You don't just take some chump because you have a need. That's a recipe for disaster. And it's not like the picks we've made have not been need areas. Safety was a bigger disaster last season than DL, IMHO. We clearly needed another corner, too (though I don't like moving the 1st to do it). Your opinion on this is just flat wrong. You NEVER draft purely out of need if there are players you feel a lot better about. To call it "an embarrassment of biblical proportions" is itself an embarassing pronouncement.

Last edited by BroncoInferno; 04-26-2009 at 01:49 PM..
BroncoInferno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2009, 01:47 PM   #12
Dagmar
...there ain't no devil
 
Dagmar's Avatar
 
..there's just God when he's drunk.

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Morrison
Posts: 16,755

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Tim Tebow
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SoCalBronco View Post
It was an abomination and an embarassment of biblical proportions. This was the biggest problem. You can't p***Y out of it by saying "oh well, we didnt like who was there when we picked". That's bull****. Get over it. You work with the talent. You give up an extra third to get Raji, since you are willing to piss away everything else. Or you give up an extra third to get Brace. Or you just draft the 3-4 skill set players in the later rounds EVEN if you aren't totally in love with them. There's dozens and dozens of DL prospects. You HAVE to find someone you can at least work with. Don't tell me there's no one at all that they feel will fit their system. If that's the case, then change the ****ing system. They're NFL coaches for pete's sake. They're supposed to work with flawed talent and make them useful and help to cover up their flaws. Anyone can work with a perfect prototype prospect. They don't grow on trees. You work with what's available and make them better. That's what a good coach, does. You don't sit back and cry that no one really fits or is really that great. It's not like your spending a first on them. It's Day Two. It's not going to kill you if they dont pan out but you have to at least TRY to get some 3-4 DL prospects in here and work with them. They failed in that task. They utterly failed. They are a failure. What's wrong with bringing in Scott and working with him? What's wrong with bringing in Taylor and working through his flaws? How bout bringing in Hill and giving him some pro coaching to help him out? We have NOTHING on the line. NOTHING that fits the 3-4. They did a nice job of addressing the SOLB spot but nothing on the line. They're asking for suicide if they expect Thomas, Peterson and either Powell or Fields to keep people off LBs. They're going to get thrown in the LB's laps all game every game. You don't have one guy there that people are scared of. There isn't one guy there that commands a double team. They needed to address it, even with flawed prospects. If they didn't want to address it high, then they could have addressed it later, with little risk since it was Day Two.

The LBs are going to have a HELL of a time trying to play in front of this group. The coaches set them up to fail. They set them up to fail. They needed help. We needed help so bad in that area. And we could have had it...even if the help wasnt perfect. It's ok...BEGGARS CAN'T BE CHOOSERS.
Dagmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2009, 01:47 PM   #13
NFLBRONCO
Ring of Famer
 
NFLBRONCO's Avatar
 
Go Nuggets Go Lakers

Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lafayette Colorado
Posts: 8,365
Default

Any crap NT's still available in FA?
NFLBRONCO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2009, 02:00 PM   #14
oubronco
John Foneco !!
 
oubronco's Avatar
 
Mile High Magic

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sooner Country
Posts: 21,301
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SoCalBronco View Post
It was an abomination and an embarassment of biblical proportions. This was the biggest problem. You can't p***Y out of it by saying "oh well, we didnt like who was there when we picked". That's bull****. Get over it. You work with the talent. You give up an extra third to get Raji, since you are willing to piss away everything else. Or you give up an extra third to get Brace. Or you just draft the 3-4 skill set players in the later rounds EVEN if you aren't totally in love with them. There's dozens and dozens of DL prospects. You HAVE to find someone you can at least work with. Don't tell me there's no one at all that they feel will fit their system. If that's the case, then change the ****ing system. They're NFL coaches for pete's sake. They're supposed to work with flawed talent and make them useful and help to cover up their flaws. Anyone can work with a perfect prototype prospect. They don't grow on trees. You work with what's available and make them better. That's what a good coach, does. You don't sit back and cry that no one really fits or is really that great. It's not like your spending a first on them. It's Day Two. It's not going to kill you if they dont pan out but you have to at least TRY to get some 3-4 DL prospects in here and work with them. They failed in that task. They utterly failed. They are a failure. What's wrong with bringing in Scott and working with him? What's wrong with bringing in Taylor and working through his flaws? How bout bringing in Hill and giving him some pro coaching to help him out? We have NOTHING on the line. NOTHING that fits the 3-4. They did a nice job of addressing the SOLB spot but nothing on the line. They're asking for suicide if they expect Thomas, Peterson and either Powell or Fields to keep people off LBs. They're going to get thrown in the LB's laps all game every game. You don't have one guy there that people are scared of. There isn't one guy there that commands a double team. They needed to address it, even with flawed prospects. If they didn't want to address it high, then they could have addressed it later, with little risk since it was Day Two.

The LBs are going to have a HELL of a time trying to play in front of this group. The coaches set them up to fail. They set them up to fail. They needed help. We needed help so bad in that area. And we could have had it...even if the help wasnt perfect. It's ok...BEGGARS CAN'T BE CHOOSERS.
I totally agree we did not need a small corner we have one in Jack Williams and we damn sure didn't need a TE that caught a wopping 12 passes that is a blocking TE what the hell does Graham do best
oubronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2009, 02:02 PM   #15
rmsanger
Elway > PFM
 
rmsanger's Avatar
 
Another one bites the dust!

Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,214

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

No DL is a term used too loosely. We have a phobia of draft DTs or now specifically a NT. We've had a crap load of bust DEs.
rmsanger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2009, 02:02 PM   #16
barryr
Ring of Famer
 
New to the Forum

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,967

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

Fields and Powell were each 4th-5th round picks and at NT at the moment, yet we're to believe in a weak draft for DL there is just someone so much better(it's a guarantee you know) waiting there in those same rounds? Amazing the dumb crap that's believed by some.
barryr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2009, 02:05 PM   #17
Odysseus
Fan of the home team
 
Odysseus's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Durango, Colorado
Posts: 11,969

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Mark Schlereth
Default

Which is worst? The fact the Broncos don't pick up DL players, pick defensive busts in every round, or let DL players who produce leave?

Last edited by Odysseus; 04-26-2009 at 02:24 PM..
Odysseus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2009, 02:11 PM   #18
BroncoBuff
***************
 
BroncoBuff's Avatar
 
Playing for January

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 26,127

Adopt-a-Bronco:
MALIK+QUANTERUS
Default

We could have drafted JARRON GILBERT with that last-2nd round pick.

Instead we take a blocking TE. A blocking TE.


The only explanation is we're gonna play 4-3 the majority of the time.
BroncoBuff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2009, 02:24 PM   #19
TheDave
Sauced...
 
TheDave's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 15,001
Default

I think people need to come to grips with the fact that our FO has a different opinion of the Dline than we do...

They did nothing in the draft and next to nothing in FA (minus Fields) to address it. We have to assume they like what they have a hell of a lot better than most of us.
TheDave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2009, 02:26 PM   #20
Br0nc0Buster
2013 AFC Champs
 
Br0nc0Buster's Avatar
 
Oh........yea

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Kansas
Posts: 5,974
Default

I was suprised we were not more aggressive going after linemen, however I remembered one of McDaniels' comments about how young our linemen were, and how they hadnt reached their potential yet.

Kinda makes me think unless there was someone they were in love with within reach, they would just see what they got this year.

I am quite nervous about the Dline, as most of the guys we got seem to be backups at best, but guys like Ayers, Powell, Thomas do in fact have potential.

We will just have to see.

Regardless I see our defense being better than last years
Br0nc0Buster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2009, 02:27 PM   #21
BroncoMan4ever
Ring of Famer
 
BroncoMan4ever's Avatar
 
That's just like your opinion, man

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 13,508

Adopt-a-Bronco:
VIRGIL GREEN!!!
Default

i am a little upset that guys i thought would be good for us were bypassed in favor of others, however, i am just going under the assumption that, Nolan either didn't care for any of the DL talent in this draft, which is understandable because this draft is weak, or he thinks we already have a few decent guys on the roster. plus McDaniels has said we weren't done in FA so we very well may be bringing in more veteran DL help.
BroncoMan4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2009, 02:49 PM   #22
oubronco
John Foneco !!
 
oubronco's Avatar
 
Mile High Magic

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sooner Country
Posts: 21,301
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by barryr View Post
Fields and Powell were each 4th-5th round picks and at NT at the moment, yet we're to believe in a weak draft for DL there is just someone so much better(it's a guarantee you know) waiting there in those same rounds? Amazing the dumb crap that's believed by some.
Fields was a backup for the 49ers and Powell we have no idea about he was drafted as a DT for the 4-3 and how the hell are they supposed to develop any NT's for the 3-4 if they don't draft any that seems pretty dumb to me
oubronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2009, 02:56 PM   #23
Finger Roll
Ring of Famer
 
Finger Roll's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,556
Default

if we stay mostly at 4-3 (which i think we will) won't Ayers be considered a DL? Plus the bust rate for a DT in the first 3 rounds is very high. I think more than any position except maybe QB and WR
Finger Roll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2009, 02:57 PM   #24
Mogulseeker
Formerly mightysmurf
 
Mogulseeker's Avatar
 
Eat greedy

Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Boulder... Vail when it snoooows
Posts: 16,891

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Lamin Barrow
Default

Jarvis Moss

Paul Toveissi
Mogulseeker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2009, 03:05 PM   #25
Man-Goblin
One Gap Penetrator
 
Man-Goblin's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Huntersville, NC
Posts: 6,037

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Connor Barth
Default

I find it quite amusing that people steadfastly assume the Broncos can always trade up or trade down if they want to. It takes two teams to make a trade, and there may not have been any takers. So what do you do then? You take the best player on your board.

And as for drafting flawed players simply because they fit the scheme, isn't that what they already have? I'd say go with the flawed players you've got for a year if you have to, and address other areas with players you're more comfortable with.

But ya know, that's just me. I'm sure other people would be happy with the team drafting more ****ty players as long as they are projected to fit the scheme.
Man-Goblin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes



Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:50 AM.


Denver Broncos