Mock's take day 1. - The Orange Mane

watermock · 04-25-2009, 09:32 PM

First off, trading our 2010 first rounder for a blocking TE when we allready have one being paid millions just to block was stupid.

We also are obviouysly trying to trade Scheff, now it's a grab bag.

Knowshow Morono isn't even 4.5. HILLIS IS JUST AS GOOD.

WTF did we sign 3 FA's for

We could of gotten Green much later and gotten Crabtree.

Ayers. Tweener. Played De. Too small for the 3/4, but "givve him 3 years", give me a break! Unknown at OLB.

Didn't we allready screw ourselve by drafting undersized DE's? We now have 4.

And where was the DL heavy metal? Orakapo was right there, and people say the skins were ready to trade!. WTF?

This has McDummy'sfigerprintsall over it. So much for Bowlen having a real GM.

Grade: D

Popps · 04-25-2009, 09:33 PM

Hey, let's all start individual threads for our draft reviews!

NFLBRONCO · 04-25-2009, 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by watermock

First off, trading our 2010 first rounder for a blocking TE when we allready have one being paid millions just to block was stupid.

We also are obviouysly trying to trade Scheff, now it's a grab bag.

Knowshow Morono isn't even 4.5. HILLIS IS JUST AS GOOD.

WTF did we sign 3 FA's for

We could of gotten Green much later and gotten Crabtree.

Ayers. Tweener. Played De. Too small for the 3/4, but "givve him 3 years", give me a break! Unknown at OLB.

Didn't we allready screw ourselve by drafting undersized DE's? We now have 4.

And where was the DL heavy metal? Orakapo was right there, and people say the skins were ready to trade!. WTF?

This has McDummy'sfigerprintsall over it. So much for Bowlen having a real GM.

Grade: D

We traded 2010 #1 pick for CB not TE

Doggcow · 04-25-2009, 09:34 PM

Lol this thread is full of fail. I didn't even bother reading past the first sentance because it's obviously ignorant and uninformed.

watermock · 04-25-2009, 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Popps

Hey, let's all start individual threads for our draft reviews!

Indeed, if your happy, it's all that matters.

I don't care. Either McDummy is a genius or a reach. I'm guessing the latter.

garandman · 04-25-2009, 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doggcow

Lol this thread is full of fail. I didn't even bother reading past the first sentance because it's obviously ignorant and uninformed.

If your going to "poke' fun at someones ignorance, check your two sentEnce response for spelling errors, idiot..

watermock · 04-25-2009, 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doggcow

Lol this thread is full of fail. I didn't even bother reading past the first sentance because it's obviously ignorant and uninformed.

OK, so freaking what?

We traded our 2010 1st (dunno which one), for a slower DWill?

We COULD of gotten Bradford next year or McCoy. Please tell me didn't trade our own #1 next year.

5-11 in 2010.

listopencil · 04-25-2009, 09:52 PM

Mock- I'm with you. When I look back at today I just want to punch somebody in the throat.

robbieopperude · 04-25-2009, 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by watermock

OK, so freaking what?

We traded our 2010 1st (dunno which one), for a slower DWill?

We COULD of gotten Bradford next year or McCoy. Please tell me didn't trade our own #1 next year.

5-11 in 2010.

Bradford and McCoy are both overrated. The real problem is we may have traded the rights to Taylor Mays for Alphonso Smith. That is the problem.

HEAV · 04-25-2009, 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NFLBRONCO

We traded 2010 #1 pick for CB not TE

He's just drunk...again...

Rabb · 04-25-2009, 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by robbieopperude

Bradford and McCoy are both overrated. The real problem is we may have traded the rights to Taylor Mays for Alphonso Smith. That is the problem.

that is exactly what I was thinking, and it just ****ing infuriates me

especially because I bet we could have had Smith with #48

robbieopperude · 04-25-2009, 10:03 PM

I don't think Smith would have been there at 48 but I find it ridiculous that we traded the higher of the number one picks. I know the season hasn't been played out and I think Denver will shoot out of the gate at 3-0 but they aren't going to finish any better than 9-7. That would be a really good season. The bears should finish 9-7 at there worst unless Cutler goes down.

Elway777 · 04-25-2009, 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by watermock

First off, trading our 2010 first rounder for a blocking TE when we allready have one being paid millions just to block was stupid.

We also are obviouysly trying to trade Scheff, now it's a grab bag.

Knowshow Morono isn't even 4.5. HILLIS IS JUST AS GOOD.

WTF did we sign 3 FA's for

We could of gotten Green much later and gotten Crabtree.

Ayers. Tweener. Played De. Too small for the 3/4, but "givve him 3 years", give me a break! Unknown at OLB.

Didn't we allready screw ourselve by drafting undersized DE's? We now have 4.

And where was the DL heavy metal? Orakapo was right there, and people say the skins were ready to trade!. WTF?

This has McDummy'sfigerprintsall over it. So much for Bowlen having a real GM.

Grade: D

Best write up so far. It might have some fails in it but still does the best job of pointing out how bad the Broncos draft was.

ColoradoDarin · 04-25-2009, 10:17 PM

Best RB
Best DE (perhaps best defensive player)
Best Intercepting CB
Best Intercepting safety
Best blocking TE

watermock · 04-25-2009, 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ColoradoDarin

Best RB
Best DE (perhaps best defensive player)
Best Intercepting CB
Best Intercepting safety
Best blocking TE

We'll see.

Mcdummy seems intent on destoying the offense, while not addressing the need for 3 big linemen to run the 3/4.

Jekyll15Hyde · 04-25-2009, 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by watermock

Please tell me didn't trade our own #1 next year.

5-11 in 2010.

Cant tell you that. We kept Chicago's 20 something pick and gave up our top 10. Brillliant!

watermock · 04-25-2009, 11:29 PM

So everyone except Mcdummy knows the more valueable pick in '10 will be Da Bears, because we will in immediately.

We traded a top 10 pick for a smallish CB?

We should of at least traded the Bears pick.

But we're going to win right away....

spdirty · 04-25-2009, 11:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by watermock

Grade: D

Too generous.

watermock · 04-25-2009, 11:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hdtech96

Cant tell you that. We kept Chicago's 20 something pick and gave up our top 10. Brillliant!

So we have zero shot at another FRANCHISE QB, even if you dislike Jay.

Kyle Orton?

Give me a ****ing break, he played in the big 10.

He played against BAD teams.

I'm incredulous how people keep defending this moronic FO.

It's like watching a toddler master leggos. I don't have the time for toilet training.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

04-25-2009, 09:32 PM	#1
watermock "Hoodie Jr" "Hug me!" Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Hot Springs, Ouachitah Posts: 77,090	Mock's take day 1. First off, trading our 2010 first rounder for a blocking TE when we allready have one being paid millions just to block was stupid. We also are obviouysly trying to trade Scheff, now it's a grab bag. Knowshow Morono isn't even 4.5. HILLIS IS JUST AS GOOD. WTF did we sign 3 FA's for We could of gotten Green much later and gotten Crabtree. Ayers. Tweener. Played De. Too small for the 3/4, but "givve him 3 years", give me a break! Unknown at OLB. Didn't we allready screw ourselve by drafting undersized DE's? We now have 4. And where was the DL heavy metal? Orakapo was right there, and people say the skins were ready to trade!. WTF? This has McDummy'sfigerprintsall over it. So much for Bowlen having a real GM. Grade: D

04-25-2009, 09:33 PM	#2
Popps TEAM FIRST. Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Los Angeles, CA Posts: 29,785	Hey, let's all start individual threads for our draft reviews!

04-25-2009, 09:34 PM	#4
Doggcow Rebel Laughs At Unbelievers Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 8,298 Adopt-a-Bronco: Von Miller	Lol this thread is full of fail. I didn't even bother reading past the first sentance because it's obviously ignorant and uninformed.

04-25-2009, 09:52 PM	#8
listopencil [sarcasm]text[/sarcasm] BOOM! Winner. Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: The People's Republic Of California Posts: 8,580 Adopt-a-Bronco: Broncos FO	Mock- I'm with you. When I look back at today I just want to punch somebody in the throat.

04-25-2009, 10:03 PM	#12
robbieopperude Perennial Pro-bowler Shannon to Canton! Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 766 Adopt-a-Bronco: None	I don't think Smith would have been there at 48 but I find it ridiculous that we traded the higher of the number one picks. I know the season hasn't been played out and I think Denver will shoot out of the gate at 3-0 but they aren't going to finish any better than 9-7. That would be a really good season. The bears should finish 9-7 at there worst unless Cutler goes down.

04-25-2009, 10:17 PM	#14
ColoradoDarin Ring of Famer AFCW Champs! Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: St Augustine, FL Posts: 5,521 Adopt-a-Bronco: Knowshon's Shoe	Best RB Best DE (perhaps best defensive player) Best Intercepting CB Best Intercepting safety Best blocking TE

04-25-2009, 11:29 PM	#17
watermock "Hoodie Jr" "Hug me!" Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Hot Springs, Ouachitah Posts: 77,090	So everyone except Mcdummy knows the more valueable pick in '10 will be Da Bears, because we will in immediately. We traded a top 10 pick for a smallish CB? We should of at least traded the Bears pick. But we're going to win right away....