Solomon Wilcots defends Hall - The Orange Mane

lex · 09-10-2008, 09:23 AM

He's saying Hall was playing the coverage he was assigned but is alluding to the fact that he was supposed to play off on Royal.

Perhaps this is true, but if so, it could mean good things for the big play in the future because if Royals performance was a result of playing soft, Monday night could dictate CBs playing up, in which case, we could start seeing more shots downfield.

Kaylore · 09-10-2008, 09:24 AM

Or Hall just sucks.

no-pseudo-fan · 09-10-2008, 09:25 AM

Hall played up on Royal too, and Royal beat him in press coverage.

worm · 09-10-2008, 09:27 AM

Its the schemeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!!

skpac1001 · 09-10-2008, 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lex

He's saying Hall was playing the coverage he was assigned but is alluding to the fact that he was supposed to play off on Royal.
Perhaps this is true, but if so, it could mean good things for the big play in the future because if Royals performance was a result of playing soft, Monday night could dictate CBs playing up, in which case, we could start seeing more shots downfield.

Well he did an excellent job if thats the case. He took playing off to a whole new level.

SonOfLe-loLang · 09-10-2008, 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaylore

Or Hall just sucks.

Yeah, i think its more this.

Smiling Assassin27 · 09-10-2008, 09:28 AM

does the 'assigned coverage' also entail taking cheap shots and acting like an arsehole?

bap454 · 09-10-2008, 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaylore

Or Hall just sucks.

No.. this can not be the case. They spent millions upon millions on this guy. He has to be good. Just like the other clown ... all world Javon.

DomCasual · 09-10-2008, 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaylore

Or Hall just sucks.

I'm banking more on that.

gyldenlove · 09-10-2008, 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lex

He's saying Hall was playing the coverage he was assigned but is alluding to the fact that he was supposed to play off on Royal.

Perhaps this is true, but if so, it could mean good things for the big play in the future because if Royals performance was a result of playing soft, Monday night could dictate CBs playing up, in which case, we could start seeing more shots downfield.

It could be a whole new type of coverage, the type where your ass covers as much grass as possible, because that is pretty much all Hall covered all night.

broncofan2438 · 09-10-2008, 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lex

He's saying Hall was playing the coverage he was assigned but is alluding to the fact that he was supposed to play off on Royal.

Perhaps this is true, but if so, it could mean good things for the big play in the future because if Royals performance was a result of playing soft, Monday night could dictate CBs playing up, in which case, we could start seeing more shots downfield.

Makes sense to me.....Love it!

lex · 09-10-2008, 09:33 AM

Yeah, Royal made him look bad and Royal is a rookie but maybe thats a credit to Royal. While I think Hall is overrated and overpaid, I dont think he is as poor as Royal made him look Monday night.

DenverBrit · 09-10-2008, 09:43 AM

Kiffin left him out on an Island to make a point.

"Mr Davis, your overpaid CB should be able to cover a rookie, right??"

Kaylore · 09-10-2008, 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lex

Yeah, Royal made him look bad and Royal is a rookie but maybe thats a credit to Royal. While I think Hall is overrated and overpaid, I dont think he is as poor as Royal made him look Monday night.

Then Eddie Royal is going to have a Randy Moss type season.

BroncoFanatic · 09-10-2008, 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DenverBrit

Kiffin left him out on an Island to make a point.

"Mr Davis, your overpaid CB should be able to cover a rookie, right??"

Interesting take, given how Kiffen and the undead transvestite Davis are warring.

gyldenlove · 09-10-2008, 09:48 AM

It was quantum mechanics.

The Pauli exclusion principel states that 2 identical particles can not be in the same state in the same place. If we assume that Hall and Royal are actually identical and it wasn't because Hall sucks and Royal doesn't, then because they were both in California at the time (the same state) they couldn't be in the same place.

So really what happened was the Hall was just obeying the laws of quantum mechanics by not being in the same place as Royal.

(I am just fonecoing around here)

400HZ · 09-10-2008, 09:49 AM

The scheme sucks and Hall sucks.

DenverBrit · 09-10-2008, 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BroncoFanatic

Interesting take, given how Kiffen and the undead transvestite Davis are warring.

Kiffin has been candid about not having any say in who plays on the team.....and appears to be determined to get fired.
I'm sure Kiffin's contract has his butt covered, bearing in mind Uncle Al's history with coaches.
4th game and a few more comments should do it.

bronco militia · 09-10-2008, 10:07 AM

excuses, excuses.........

oh yeah, that's the Raider way

alkemical · 09-10-2008, 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco militia

excuses, excuses.........

oh yeah, that's the Raider way

I thought it was sucking....

alkemical · 09-10-2008, 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gyldenlove

It was quantum mechanics.

The Pauli exclusion principel states that 2 identical particles can not be in the same state in the same place. If we assume that Hall and Royal are actually identical and it wasn't because Hall sucks and Royal doesn't, then because they were both in California at the time (the same state) they couldn't be in the same place.

So really what happened was the Hall was just obeying the laws of quantum mechanics by not being in the same place as Royal.

(I am just fonecoing around here)

Then explain how the raiders can SUCK and BLOW at the same time?

bronco militia · 09-10-2008, 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by amesj523

I thought it was sucking....

that's the end product, but we see and hear the same **** over and over again from current and former players.

I hope Al Davis never dies!

Los Broncos · 09-10-2008, 10:13 AM

Royal was just to quick for him, end of story.

gyldenlove · 09-10-2008, 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by amesj523

Then explain how the raiders can SUCK and BLOW at the same time?

Modern science has its limitations, there are mysteries that even physicists can't solve...

Los Broncos · 09-10-2008, 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gyldenlove

Modern science has its limitations, there are mysteries that even physicists can't solve...

09-10-2008, 09:23 AM	#1
lex Bowlen Sold Us Out! The Broncos have been DisemBowlened Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Chi-Town Posts: 10,253 Adopt-a-Bronco: None	Solomon Wilcots defends Hall He's saying Hall was playing the coverage he was assigned but is alluding to the fact that he was supposed to play off on Royal. Perhaps this is true, but if so, it could mean good things for the big play in the future because if Royals performance was a result of playing soft, Monday night could dictate CBs playing up, in which case, we could start seeing more shots downfield.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

09-10-2008, 09:24 AM	#2
Kaylore 6-37, Raider fans. Yummy birds and snow! Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Ceti Alpha V Posts: 41,008 Adopt-a-Bronco: Wesley Duke	Or Hall just sucks.

09-10-2008, 09:25 AM	#3
no-pseudo-fan True Orange & Blue Follow me... Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: EPT Posts: 2,136 Adopt-a-Bronco: Hidalgo	Hall played up on Royal too, and Royal beat him in press coverage.

09-10-2008, 09:27 AM	#4
worm Great moments are born... ...from great opportunity Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 3,947 Adopt-a-Bronco: #20	Its the schemeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!!

09-10-2008, 09:28 AM	#7
Smiling Assassin27 STOP! KIPER TIME! Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: In a van down by the river Posts: 10,955 Adopt-a-Bronco: Von Miller	does the 'assigned coverage' also entail taking cheap shots and acting like an arsehole?

09-10-2008, 09:33 AM	#12
lex Bowlen Sold Us Out! The Broncos have been DisemBowlened Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Chi-Town Posts: 10,253 Adopt-a-Bronco: None	Yeah, Royal made him look bad and Royal is a rookie but maybe thats a credit to Royal. While I think Hall is overrated and overpaid, I dont think he is as poor as Royal made him look Monday night.

09-10-2008, 09:43 AM	#13
DenverBrit Just hanging out. Got a breath mint?? Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Denver Posts: 11,071 Adopt-a-Bronco: The Team	Kiffin left him out on an Island to make a point. "Mr Davis, your overpaid CB should be able to cover a rookie, right??"

09-10-2008, 09:48 AM	#16
gyldenlove Ring of Famer Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: London, ON Posts: 10,009 Adopt-a-Bronco: Spencer Larsen	It was quantum mechanics. The Pauli exclusion principel states that 2 identical particles can not be in the same state in the same place. If we assume that Hall and Royal are actually identical and it wasn't because Hall sucks and Royal doesn't, then because they were both in California at the time (the same state) they couldn't be in the same place. So really what happened was the Hall was just obeying the laws of quantum mechanics by not being in the same place as Royal. (I am just fonecoing around here)

09-10-2008, 09:49 AM	#17
400HZ Ring of Famer Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 4,342 Adopt-a-Bronco: Ed Hochuli	The scheme sucks and Hall sucks.

09-10-2008, 10:07 AM	#19
bronco militia Ring of Famer THE GREATEST Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: colorado springs, co Posts: 22,567	excuses, excuses......... oh yeah, that's the Raider way

09-10-2008, 10:13 AM	#23
Los Broncos Ring of farmers Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Anaheim Hills, Santa Ana Mountains CA Posts: 18,766 Adopt-a-Bronco: Ryan Clady	Royal was just to quick for him, end of story.