|
10-30-2010, 02:41 PM
|
#51 | |
|
~~~
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Earth Division
Posts: 19,802
Adopt-a-Bronco: Gilgamesh |
Quote:
I said that. Not Thy. Try and keep up. |
|
|
|
|
10-30-2010, 02:44 PM
|
#52 | |
|
Mo' holla fo' yo' dolla!
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: In a bunker in an undisclosed location
Posts: 52,697
|
Quote:
 Pot/kettle/black indeed. No comment from you re: the 41 U.S. Counter-Terrorism and Intelligence Agency Veterans (who) Challenge the Official Account of 9/11 - just straight to the ad hominem you go. Typical. |
|
|
|
|
|
10-30-2010, 02:46 PM
|
#53 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 19,601
|
Quote:
That the Randi forum gets this kind of commentary from gaff-o just shows that they're right, and, (as usual), he's wrong. |
|
|
|
|
|
10-30-2010, 02:47 PM
|
#54 | |
|
Mo' holla fo' yo' dolla!
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: In a bunker in an undisclosed location
Posts: 52,697
|
Quote:
41 U.S. Counter-Terrorism and Intelligence Agency Veterans vs. an anonymous, religiously insane blowhard on an Internet discussion forum... ....I think I'll go with the CT and intelligence vets.  |
|
|
|
|
|
10-30-2010, 02:48 PM
|
#55 |
|
~~~
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Earth Division
Posts: 19,802
Adopt-a-Bronco: Gilgamesh |
 |
|
|
|
|
10-30-2010, 02:49 PM
|
#56 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Boredom Capital of the Universe (Everett, WA)
Posts: 2,894
|
Quote:
I was just wondering why it is that, as you seem to be certain that 9-11 was in inside jobbity-job, you aren't debating it with the serious debunkers on JREF? |
|
|
|
|
|
10-30-2010, 02:54 PM
|
#57 |
|
Broncosf*rums refugee
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 428
Adopt-a-Bronco: B. Bunkley |
Dirka dirkas from Pakistan flew planes into our buildings. They were easy targets and security on planes was lax at the time. Bin Laden was believed to be behind it and also took credit for it.
We did not blow up our own buildings and kill our own people. It would have required a huge amount of people sworn to permanent silence. In this camera filled, investigative, camera filled society complete with whisteblowers and wikileaks, how could one honestly come to the conclusion that we attacked ourselves on 9-11? Again, common sense people. Again, the most trusted, verified and proven source on the subject...(No, not paranoid prison planet or infowars) Popular mechanics.... http://www.popularmechanics.com/tech...y/news/1227842 |
|
|
|
|
10-30-2010, 02:54 PM
|
#58 | |
|
Mo' holla fo' yo' dolla!
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: In a bunker in an undisclosed location
Posts: 52,697
|
Quote:
That is, instead of commenting on the story I linked, you just went straight to your usual attempt to impugn my credibility, etc. (if I really believed "x, y, and z," then I would be debating with so-and-so.) |
|
|
|
|
|
10-30-2010, 03:09 PM
|
#59 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Boredom Capital of the Universe (Everett, WA)
Posts: 2,894
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-30-2010, 03:13 PM
|
#60 | |
|
Mo' holla fo' yo' dolla!
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: In a bunker in an undisclosed location
Posts: 52,697
|
Quote:
That's what makes you the poster boy for intellectual dishonesty. In any event, yours is the same tediously circular reasoning, i.e., "those well prepared to debate the issue" = those who share The Lone Bolt's commitment to the official BushCo account as a foregone conclusion. |
|
|
|
|
|
10-30-2010, 03:18 PM
|
#61 | |
|
Broncosf*rums refugee
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 428
Adopt-a-Bronco: B. Bunkley |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-30-2010, 03:18 PM
|
#62 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Boredom Capital of the Universe (Everett, WA)
Posts: 2,894
|
Quote:
You are implying that they have no argument. How do you know this? How about putting that belief to the test? What are you afraid of? |
|
|
|
|
|
10-30-2010, 03:20 PM
|
#63 | |
|
Mo' holla fo' yo' dolla!
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: In a bunker in an undisclosed location
Posts: 52,697
|
Quote:
What are you afraid of? |
|
|
|
|
|
10-30-2010, 03:21 PM
|
#64 | |
|
Mo' holla fo' yo' dolla!
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: In a bunker in an undisclosed location
Posts: 52,697
|
Quote:
You know what they say about assuming... |
|
|
|
|
|
10-30-2010, 03:26 PM
|
#65 | |
|
Broncosf*rums refugee
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 428
Adopt-a-Bronco: B. Bunkley |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-30-2010, 03:26 PM
|
#66 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Boredom Capital of the Universe (Everett, WA)
Posts: 2,894
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-30-2010, 03:29 PM
|
#67 | |
|
Mo' holla fo' yo' dolla!
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: In a bunker in an undisclosed location
Posts: 52,697
|
Quote:
Either that, or you're just a typical right-winger, i.e., your preferred "debate" tactic is the straw man argument. |
|
|
|
|
|
10-30-2010, 03:31 PM
|
#68 | |
|
Mo' holla fo' yo' dolla!
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: In a bunker in an undisclosed location
Posts: 52,697
|
Quote:
Why are you so insecure in your beliefs that you need to call in backup from another site? |
|
|
|
|
|
10-30-2010, 03:34 PM
|
#69 | |
|
Mo' holla fo' yo' dolla!
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: In a bunker in an undisclosed location
Posts: 52,697
|
Quote:
Do you know that it's possible to agree with some of Jones' (or anyone else's) ideas and disagree with others? Or, like most regressives, are you too "black or white" in your thinking to wrap your head around that concept? |
|
|
|
|
|
10-30-2010, 03:37 PM
|
#70 | |
|
Broncosf*rums refugee
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 428
Adopt-a-Bronco: B. Bunkley |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-30-2010, 03:41 PM
|
#71 | |
|
Mo' holla fo' yo' dolla!
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: In a bunker in an undisclosed location
Posts: 52,697
|
Quote:
Wow - that's a reach only a regressive could pull off. |
|
|
|
|
|
10-30-2010, 03:45 PM
|
#72 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Boredom Capital of the Universe (Everett, WA)
Posts: 2,894
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-30-2010, 03:51 PM
|
#73 | |
|
Mo' holla fo' yo' dolla!
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: In a bunker in an undisclosed location
Posts: 52,697
|
Quote:
Why are you so insecure with your views that you need to outsource discussion to another forum? |
|
|
|
|
|
10-30-2010, 04:00 PM
|
#74 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 9,837
|
Lone Nut,
I gave you the link. Jones went on a world wide tour last fall -- presenting the evidence and challenging skeptics to review it -- and to respond to his science. So far, your RANDI skeptics have not done so. Here -- for the umpteenth time - -is the link. http://communitycurrency.org/911TV/ In the video Jones explains in detail how his team checked out the claim about the paint. They were able to obtain and test a sample of red primer paint from the WTC. An artist had created a sculpture from some WTC columns. The artist scraped off a large sample of red paint from the steel and sent it to Jones. BTW the artist has since become a truther. The chemistry of the paint was different from that of the chips found in the dust. Period. End of story. So far -- the Jones lecture is not up at Youtube. You will have to invest $20 for the DVD. Your attack of Bentham is laughable. Like it or not, this was a peer reviewed paper. You and others attack the on line journal simply because you don't like the results. It's the same old shyte we've seen on issue after issue -- over the long history of science. People who don't like the results -- snipe about the character or credentials of the researcher. Or the journal in question. Instead of dealing with the science itself. We saw a similar pattern after the cold fusion discovery in 1989. The two scientists who announced it, Pons and Fleishman, were ridiculed and hounded out of this country. They had to go to Europe just to continue their research. Dr Steven Jones was the third scientist involved in the cold fusion issue. He developed a different line of research. You can find a good discussion in FIRE FROM ICE by Eugene Mallove. Mallove wrote the book in 1999. By then it was clear to him that cold fusion was a real phenomenon -- though still unexplained -- and that Pons and Flieshman had been the subject of a witch hunt by the hot fusion establishment. Why? It was a turf war. Cold fusion threatened a major breakthrough that would put hot fusion out of business. The hot fusion scientists reacted to defend their grant money, their labs, their jobs, their prestige and power. It was science gone amok. We are seeing a repeat over this nanothermite issue. Same old sad story. Only the future hangs in the balance. MHG Last edited by mhgaffney; 10-30-2010 at 05:38 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
10-30-2010, 04:05 PM
|
#75 | |
|
Mo' holla fo' yo' dolla!
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: In a bunker in an undisclosed location
Posts: 52,697
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
Linear Mode
