![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Church Eyes.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,787
Adopt-a-Bronco: Mr. Miller |
FORCE OUT, FACEMASK RULES CHANGED
Posted by Michael David Smith on April 2, 2008, 11:40 a.m. NFL teams approved several rules changes at the league meeting today, most of which were an effort to make the rules easier to understand and enforce. The biggest change is that the force out rule no longer exists. In the past, if a receiver jumped to catch a ball and was pushed out of bounds while he was in the air, officials had to make a judgment call to determine whether he would have come down in bounds. That rule, which many observers felt was enforced inconsistently, has been eliminated, and now it’s simple: If the receiver didn’t touch two feet or one of any other body part in bounds, it’s an incomplete pass. Five-yard facemask penalties have also been eliminated. Serious face masks involving grabbing or twisting the player’s helmet will remain 15-yard penalties, and minor face masks involving a player accidentally grabbing the mask and immediately letting go will not be flagged at all. Another rules change involves the opening coin toss, where the NFL will now adopt the college rule that allows the coach to defer his choice of kicking or receiving until the second half. The league also made field goals on which the ball bounces off the goal post reviewable by instant replay. Last year Browns kicker Phil Dawson made a field goal that passed over the crossbar, bounced off the support post and went back into the field of play. The officials initially ruled the kick no good before correctly ruling it good. Last year they were not permitted to use replay to determine whether the kick was good; in the future they will be able to use it on such field goals. The league also has changed two rules regarding fumbles: A legal forward handoff that is dropped is now a fumble, as is a direct snap from center that hits the ground before it is touched by the quarterback. In the past, the forward handoff would have been an incomplete pass and the botched snap would have been a false start. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Giving You The Business
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Huntersville, NC
Posts: 5,588
Adopt-a-Bronco: Woodyard |
Wait, if a team won the toss they had to receive? Has Madden had it wrong all these years?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The Ville
Posts: 12,077
Adopt-a-Bronco: Brian Dawkins |
Quote:
I hate this rule. It's going to cost TD's. A defender can now push a receiver outta the endzone. It's going to be bad. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: colorado springs, co
Posts: 22,568
|
Quote:
help me out here...I can't remember a time when a botched snap that hit the ground was ever ruled a false start. what about in the shotgun? also, a dropped shovel pass is now considered a fumble. now thats stupid. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Athletic Supporter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Mass
Posts: 19,039
Adopt-a-Bronco: Matt Prater |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Athletic Supporter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Mass
Posts: 19,039
Adopt-a-Bronco: Matt Prater |
One more reason to say no to Desean Jackson. Every time that little 150 pound receiver leaves his feet, even in the middle of the field, guys will line up to carry him out of bounds before he can hit the ground again. Genius.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Giving You The Business
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Huntersville, NC
Posts: 5,588
Adopt-a-Bronco: Woodyard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,360
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
The forceout rule change is stupid. It's not hard to rule a forceout and these, especailly on 3rd downs and in the endzones, can be game-changing plays.
I like getting rid of the 5 yard facemask. And I always thought you had to option to kick if you won the coin toss. Shovel pass = fumble = retarded. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: colorado springs, co
Posts: 22,568
|
Quote:
IMO, Refs were calling it way to often. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Church Eyes.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,787
Adopt-a-Bronco: Mr. Miller |
Do you guys even watch football?
Force out removal eliminates the ref's bias. A shovel pass is still a pass. A forward hand off would now be a fumble. ALthough I can not remember the last time I saw a forward handoff. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,342
Adopt-a-Bronco: Ed Hochuli |
I thought 5 yard facemask penalties were a good idea. I know it's ref bias, but I can't recall ever being upset by seeing a 5 yarder vs a 15 yarder.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Rumblin' Bumblin'
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Wash DC
Posts: 7,274
|
Might as well just catch the reciever and throw him out of bounds
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
® You Tell The NFL!
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Broncos Video Vault
Posts: 6,628
Adopt-a-Bronco: i4jelway7 |
Quote:
WoW this is going to **** up the game |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Perennial Pro-bowler
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 982
|
Forward Handoff? Not sure I've ever seen one. Or am I missing something. Never have heard of categorized handoffs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: P-Town
Posts: 1,517
Adopt-a-Bronco: Frank Tripucka |
I like the rule changes. Force out rule takes the refs opinion out of the equation, and I think that's good. Lynch is licking his chops to line someone up on the sideline and knock him out of bounds for the incompletion.
5 yard penalty rule - No harm, no foul as far as I'm concerned. I bet we'll see more 15 yarders where last year it was borderline and just called for 5. Shovel pass has always been a forward pass (eventhough Elway was called for a fumble when he threw an incomplete shovel to Sewell once), so we'll probably never even notice this forward handoff rule. Coin toss = good. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Vote Joe Mays to Pro Bowl
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bismarck
Posts: 4,760
Adopt-a-Bronco: Joe Mays |
Quote:
2...Facemask rule..this is bad...now you are going to have officials holding flags because it is automatically a 15 yd penalty. the problem with this comes with the 5 yd penalty not being enforced properly. this will only lead to more judgement calls. officiating is such a gray sport...the nfl had an opportunity to give them a dark gray/light gray option and they took that away thinking it will be black or white. Mark my words, you will see fewer facemask calls this year because of the fear of throwing a flag for a minor facemask(previous years) and charging them 15 yards. 3...finally going back to the original rules. defering is part of every other level of football, why not the nfl...they previously had 3 choices...kick recieve or choose a goal...good call. 4...fg's reviewable...duh. 5...These are just words clarify a rule that is already enforced. Basically once the center grabs the football if he moves it it is a fumble, there is no longer an illegal snap. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
6-37, Raider fans.
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ceti Alpha V
Posts: 41,009
Adopt-a-Bronco: Wesley Duke |
Quote:
And thank you for bringing sense to this. The league has screwed defenses every year. This year they finally are throwing them a bone. They get the headsets to deal with noise and keeping pace with the offense. The force out rule and the face mask rule put too much of the penalty outcome on the opinion of the official. It was too subjective. They are making things as clean cut as possible and this is a good move. It's not like The Broncos don't get force outs but everyone else does. They should also make it one foot in bounds now just to make things consistent with every other level of the game, though. Last edited by Kaylore; 04-02-2008 at 03:53 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 9,149
|
If that's what was called the underneath handoff where the RB cuts in front of the QB behind the line of scrimage, it ought to be a fumble anyway. Maybe I am wrong, but that rule change is a puzzlement to me.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Solid Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 156
|
The no-force out will cause offenses to stay away from the sides and back of the end-zones.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Las Cruces, NM
Posts: 2,499
|
If they're going to eliminate the force out rule then they need to change 2 feet down to 1 foot down.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Las Cruces, NM
Posts: 2,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 70
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
Here would be a good rule change. Inside 2 minutes of the game require a team to make positive yards on a play. If the ball is not advanced the then the clock stops. IN close games that would eliminate the kneel down and make the end of a game a little more exciting when the leading team has the ball.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Norman, OK
Posts: 2,513
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
® You Tell The NFL!
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Broncos Video Vault
Posts: 6,628
Adopt-a-Bronco: i4jelway7 |
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: colorado springs, co
Posts: 22,568
|
arena ball: where TD's are as exciting as a layup
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|