The Orange Mane -  a Denver Broncos Fan Community  

Go Back   The Orange Mane - a Denver Broncos Fan Community > Orange Mane Discussion > Orange Mane Central Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Chat Room Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-25-2008, 01:34 PM   #1
SleepingTiger
Ring of Famer
 
SleepingTiger's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Murphy TX
Posts: 1,161
Default Marcus Thomas

Is he any good? I see alot of people praising Marcus, but he is invisible for most of the games. Anybody see different than I did?
SleepingTiger is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 02-25-2008, 01:37 PM   #2
Beantown Bronco
Athletic Supporter
 
Beantown Bronco's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Mass
Posts: 19,040

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Matt Prater
Default

some stuff here:

http://www.orangemane.com/BB/showthr...=marcus+thomas

and here:

http://www.orangemane.com/BB/showthread.php?t=65370
Beantown Bronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2008, 01:39 PM   #3
Gcver2ver3
Ring of Famer
 
Gcver2ver3's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tampa Bay, FL
Posts: 6,629

Adopt-a-Bronco:
not Lance Ball
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SleepingTiger View Post
Is he any good? I see alot of people praising Marcus, but he is invisible for most of the games. Anybody see different than I did?
It would be terrific for him to turn the corner this year...we need it...

i wouldn't say he was invisible but he didn't make a ton of big plays either...

i think he'll be good...
Gcver2ver3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2008, 02:25 PM   #4
Dempsey Dog
Seasoned Veteran
 
Dempsey Dog's Avatar
 
Duke...we miss ya!

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 267

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Eddie Royal
Default

We got him because his draft stock dropped, not because of talent, but because of off-field issues. I think he could be pretty good.

I am thinking Tommy Blake, the highly talented DE from TCU who will probably drop to the 4th or so because of off-field issues, could be good. I hate the fact we gamble on guys sometimes, but if we must, what are the thoughts on the mane?
Dempsey Dog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2008, 02:36 PM   #5
cmhargrove
Is this thing on???
 
cmhargrove's Avatar
 
Travis Henry's love child...

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 6,403

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Peyton Hillis
Default

I'll also add that I think he was misused last year. Honestly, we just didn't even have the right personnel to run the Bates system. Marcus Thomas was good at Florida because he used his speed and athleticism to break through the line and disrupt the backfield - that was his strength. Last year, we asked him to "stack the line" and he was often fighting against double teams.

If Slowik goes back to our previous system and starts trying to cut the gaps and bring creative blitzes, Thomas should have much more of an impact. I think last year was a great learning year, and the skills he learned should help him in short yardage defenses.

Most rookie DT's don't make an impact. His playing time was a huge bonus for his growth. I don't expect that he will ever be a game breaker. But I think he could be as effective as Gerrard Warren was (when he was trying hard). And, I think that is a good thing. He should be a solid player for us. If we can find some better talent to stick next to him, I think he will play up to that level also.

Also, remember that he hadn't been in game situation for quite a while (due to his suspension), so it probably took him a while to get back into "football shape." He should be in much better shape by TC this year.
cmhargrove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2008, 02:41 PM   #6
chrisp
Friend of the unsung
 
chrisp's Avatar
 
Not into the football......yet

Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 1,300

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Danny Trevathan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SleepingTiger View Post
Is he any good? I see alot of people praising Marcus, but he is invisible for most of the games. Anybody see different than I did?
Virtually all D-linemen are invisible their 1st year - Trevor Pryce wasn't exactly a probowler in his first year either (in fact I think he saw less playing time than Thomas did).

Jury's still out on him but he remains talented with a ton of upside and nothing can be read into his rookie year performance, except for the fact that he did see playing time and was a legit part of the rotation: sometimes even the best DTs just warm the bench for some or all fo the first year, although we did have pretty poor starters this year so maybe that means little....
chrisp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2008, 02:58 PM   #7
BroncoBuff
***************
 
BroncoBuff's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 25,433

Adopt-a-Bronco:
QUANTERUS SMITH
Default

DTs were my special obsession this past season, as I played, replayed, re-replayed, and re-re-replayed over and over and over, wearing out my Tivo buttons watching them - feeding my obsessive hostility toward Amon Gordon.

My take: MT got pushed around pretty good early in the season ... spent alotta time mimicking Amon's signature move of giving up on beating his blocker, and instead just jumping up and down in front of the blocker with an arm outstretched in the general direction of the quarterback


But toward the middle of the season, that all changed for Marcus ... I don't know if the change coincided with scrapping the Bates system, or coincided with MT intercepting that pass and returning it nicely about 25 yards, but something changed and he became a lot more effective. He moves side to side really well, and blockers had a helluva time getting their hands into him when he was moving laterally ... and he started penetrating much better than he had, (although sometimes too much as the play went past him). Remember he only played the first month of his senior season, so he made the daunting jump from college to NFL with a rusty game.

Now I think he's a fixture guy on the D-Line - a decade long starter with Pro Bowl potential. The problem is he's our only certain keeper for '08 ... Mallard, McKinley and Burton are just street free agents, so we have alotta work to do at that spot ... we had the worst DT unit in the league last year...
BroncoBuff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2008, 03:25 PM   #8
lex
Bowlen Sold Us Out!
 
lex's Avatar
 
The Broncos have been DisemBowlened

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Chi-Town
Posts: 10,253

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BroncoBuff View Post
DTs were my special obsession this past season, as I played, replayed, re-replayed, and re-re-replayed over and over and over, wearing out my Tivo buttons watching them - feeding my obsessive hostility toward Amon Gordon.

My take: MT got pushed around pretty good early in the season ... spent alotta time mimicking Amon's signature move of giving up on beating his blocker, and instead just jumping up and down in front of the blocker with an arm outstretched in the general direction of the quarterback


But toward the middle of the season, that all changed for Marcus ... I don't know if the change coincided with scrapping the Bates system, or coincided with MT intercepting that pass and returning it nicely about 25 yards, but something changed and he became a lot more effective. He moves side to side really well, and blockers had a helluva time getting their hands into him when he was moving laterally ... and he started penetrating much better than he had, (although sometimes too much as the play went past him). Remember he only played the first month of his senior season, so he made the daunting jump from college to NFL with a rusty game.

Now I think he's a fixture guy on the D-Line - a decade long starter with Pro Bowl potential. The problem is he's our only certain keeper for '08 ... Mallard, McKinley and Burton are just street free agents, so we have alotta work to do at that spot ... we had the worst DT unit in the league last year...
I thought I was the only one who had this kind of a grievance againts Amon Gordon. Basically, I did a lot of what youre saying about replaying games from the first pre-season game vs Amon Gordon. From the moment I saw Amon Gordon's name flashed up on the screen in that SF game, I knew we were in trouble. I also attentively watched Thomas. When watching him I was focused on things as basic as holding ones ground when double teamed, as this was something Amon Gordon was incredibly deficient in. He was pushed around in one-on-one scenarios as if he was being double teamed. But having also paid attention to this, I have to say that Thomas was showing signs as early as the Dallas preseason game. Up until that point he didnt look that great but I noticed he was more stalwart at holding his ground and certainly better than Gordon, even then. But thats actually not his strength, so what does that say about Gordon when a rookie is better than him in something that he isnt really even supposed to be good at?

Like a lot of rookies, Thomas was sporadic for a while then seemed to get some traction ( I think at about the point youre talkig about) then I think at the end he hit the wall a little bit.

But Thomas, if used properly, could easily be our best DLineman. Time will tell. In college, Thomas always seemed to be at his best in big games, where hed often be a wrecking ball. Florida won a national championship mainly because they had a great DLine and Safety. And if you saw the NC game you know why. Thomas didnt even play in that game and he was probably the best DLineman on the team during the time he was on the team.

Edit-- I would also like to add that I think he would greatly benefit by getting stronger in the upper-body.

Last edited by lex; 02-25-2008 at 11:03 PM..
lex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2008, 08:23 PM   #9
Dudeskey
Ring of Famer
 
Dudeskey's Avatar
 
This space for rent

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 4,314
Default

Most rookie DT's aren't going to be lights out... Their numbers won't be as gaudy as say, a rookie HB.
Dudeskey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2008, 08:31 PM   #10
That One Guy
Producer of Nonsense
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sun and Beachville
Posts: 14,042

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

Either way, it's better than GBs first round DT who I don't think was even active for a game last year and with the franchising of Corey Williams, may still not be looking at a large role. Anything is better than bench time.
That One Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2008, 08:44 PM   #11
bpc
"Nemo Me Impune Lacessit"
 
bpc's Avatar
 
1 sword keeps another in the sheath

Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northern California
Posts: 12,568

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Von Miller
Default

Seldomly do rookies come in and dominate. We didn't use him right either. He needs some help around him.

I would love to see him and Robertson playing next to each other... i think they are both power players that could wreak a lot of havok on opposing offenses.
bpc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 04:12 AM   #12
TheReverend
www.PatrickTurley.org
 
TheReverend's Avatar
 
^ buy this... twice

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 32,977

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Mike Shanahan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BroncoBuff View Post
DTs were my special obsession this past season, as I played, replayed, re-replayed, and re-re-replayed over and over and over, wearing out my Tivo buttons watching them - feeding my obsessive hostility toward Amon Gordon.

My take: MT got pushed around pretty good early in the season ... spent alotta time mimicking Amon's signature move of giving up on beating his blocker, and instead just jumping up and down in front of the blocker with an arm outstretched in the general direction of the quarterback


But toward the middle of the season, that all changed for Marcus ... I don't know if the change coincided with scrapping the Bates system, or coincided with MT intercepting that pass and returning it nicely about 25 yards, but something changed and he became a lot more effective. He moves side to side really well, and blockers had a helluva time getting their hands into him when he was moving laterally ... and he started penetrating much better than he had, (although sometimes too much as the play went past him). Remember he only played the first month of his senior season, so he made the daunting jump from college to NFL with a rusty game.

Now I think he's a fixture guy on the D-Line - a decade long starter with Pro Bowl potential. The problem is he's our only certain keeper for '08 ... Mallard, McKinley and Burton are just street free agents, so we have alotta work to do at that spot ... we had the worst DT unit in the league last year...
Just to clarify...

You have an obsession with watching 2007's DTs
MT comes on midseason
Might be due to his interception

I'd completely support this logic chain if his INT hadn't come in Week 2.

Just ****in with ya Buff, you know I love ya.
TheReverend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 04:23 AM   #13
BroncoBuff
***************
 
BroncoBuff's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 25,433

Adopt-a-Bronco:
QUANTERUS SMITH
Default

Whatever ... if you spent that much time analyzing football, your posts would probably be better.



Just ****in with ya Rev, you know I love ya.
BroncoBuff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 04:29 AM   #14
cutthemdown
A verbis ad verbera
 
cutthemdown's Avatar
 
Zimm to HOF

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 32,443
Default

We will know soon enough. I thought it seemed like he wasn't used right. He isn't huge and the take on blocker type. I thought towards end of year when he started to be asked to disrupt and penetrate he started to show some flashes. I think though he needs to get bigger though. Hopefully this yr he will have 5-10 pounds more of muscle to work with.
cutthemdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 04:29 AM   #15
fontaine
Ring of Famer
 
fontaine's Avatar
 
Go John Manning!

Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 12,422
Default

The best thing for Thomas is to have a genuine two gap run stopper beside him.

Thomas isn't a run stuffer, or a guy who's strength is to occupy two blockers against the run. If we can get even an average or half decent run stopping DT (Ian Scott) who can occupy a double team then it allows Thomas to play his natural game and try and penetrate into the backfield. If we don't then Thomas will be easily double teamed and won't get a chance to fully refine his game.

Yeah I know what you're thinking, Denver sign a decent run stopping DT? Yeah, that'll be the day.
fontaine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 04:32 AM   #16
TheReverend
www.PatrickTurley.org
 
TheReverend's Avatar
 
^ buy this... twice

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 32,977

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Mike Shanahan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BroncoBuff View Post
Whatever ... if you spent that much time analyzing football, your posts would probably be better.



Just ****in with ya Rev, you know I love ya.

Kris Jenkins just called. He's wondering why you're posting instead of giving him his goodnight kiss on the ass.

Just ****in with ya Buff, you know I love ya.
TheReverend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 08:15 AM   #17
missingnumber7
Vote Joe Mays to Pro Bowl
 
missingnumber7's Avatar
 
Joe 4 Pro Bowl ST's

Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bismarck
Posts: 4,760

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Joe Mays
Default

Just my opinion, but with Thomas, Moss, and Elvis we've got a good young base for our D-line to build on all show that glimpse of brilliance...just wish Moss could've been healthy all year.
missingnumber7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2008, 10:56 PM   #18
BroncoBuff
***************
 
BroncoBuff's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 25,433

Adopt-a-Bronco:
QUANTERUS SMITH
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheReverend View Post
Kris Jenkins just called. He's wondering why you're posting instead of giving him his goodnight kiss on the ass.

Just ****in with ya Buff, you know I love ya.
okay, you win ...
BroncoBuff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2008, 11:05 PM   #19
Punisher
® You Tell The NFL!
 
Punisher's Avatar
 
We're coming for That Belt! WOOOOO®

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Broncos Video Vault
Posts: 6,628

Adopt-a-Bronco:
i4jelway7
Default

Marcus Thomas will step up this year
Punisher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2008, 11:35 PM   #20
rastaman
Ring of Famer
 
New to the Forum

Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 7,180

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

MT just needs to start and play in 16 games this season to give him the experience he needs so bad. Slowick just needs to allow MT to play in an attack style defensive scheme. Point is, if MT can survive the season uninjured, he needs to be allowed to play as many down as possible.

Also, if Denver could manage to sign GB's free agent DT (forgot his name), and have him tandem next to MT, this would help Marcus Thomas development immensely.
rastaman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2008, 12:35 AM   #21
Kaylore
6-37, Raider fans.
 
Kaylore's Avatar
 
Yummy birds and snow!

Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ceti Alpha V
Posts: 41,019

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Wesley Duke
Default

Defensive tackle is one of the positions that takes the longest to develop at coming out college. Marcus Thomas will show more of what we are to expect from him as a player this year now that he's had a season to play and will have a full camp to re-visit what he did and did not do well. I still have serious concerns about Bates, but one thing that will help is that we will be sticking with one system and just going with that this year, whatever happens. That should make all the players more comfortable and improve the play in some measure.

Last edited by Kaylore; 02-28-2008 at 09:35 AM..
Kaylore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2008, 01:21 AM   #22
chaz
highly touted recruit
 
chaz's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,455

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Mr. Bruton
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rastaman View Post

Also, if Denver could manage to sign GB's free agent DT (forgot his name), and have him tandem next to MT, this would help Marcus Thomas development immensely.
Corey Williams. He was franchised by Green Bay.
chaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2008, 12:16 AM   #23
rastaman
Ring of Famer
 
New to the Forum

Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 7,180

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chaz View Post
Corey Williams. He was franchised by Green Bay.
I believe GB just traded Corey Williams to Cleveland for draft picks.
rastaman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2008, 12:17 AM   #24
theAPAOps5
A new beginning!
 
theAPAOps5's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 26,057

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Watermock - RIP
Default

Yep and Rogers went to Cleveland for a player and a pick
theAPAOps5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2008, 12:32 AM   #25
wolf754life
Bleed Orange and Blue
 
wolf754life's Avatar
 
more scoring + more tackling = $$$

Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,776
Default

the broncos are fine at DT, 12 and 4 next year! no worries!
wolf754life is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes



Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:05 PM.


Denver Broncos