![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
WE SUCK AGAIN
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Denver
Posts: 4,976
|
For Adam Jones+ (most likely LHP George Sherrill, RHP Chris Tillman, plus another prospect)....
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22871543/ The rest of the package is really gonna influence how I feel about this deal. If we gave up more of our high end guys like Triunfel or Clement, I'll definitely like this trade a helluva lot less. Always sucks giving up top spects but you gotta give to get. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#2 |
|
WE SUCK AGAIN
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Denver
Posts: 4,976
|
Anyone else notice how the final package the M's gave up is much better than anything that was offered for Santana? Interesting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Rebel Laughs
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 8,338
Adopt-a-Bronco: Von Miller |
This is a great move for the M's. They're in dire need of a Left handed Ace, last year they would have made the playoffs easily if they just had 1 more worthwhile arm in their rotation.
Plus our bullpen will be extremely powerful after this. Our Relievers are among tops in the league imo, they're just young. P.S. Felix is a beast. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Leucadia CA
Posts: 6,068
|
Quote:
The difference being, Haren and Bedard have two years left before they are eligible for free agency. Santana had one year remaining. Since the Mets had to pay him $137.5 million on top of giving away four prospects, that lowered Santana's value below the Haren and Bedard asking price. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Leucadia CA
Posts: 6,068
|
Quote:
There's a sector of Mariners fans that cringe when Bill Bavasi makes a move, and dealing away prospects doesn't help their long-term well being with Oakland and Texas stockpiling them. I like the move regardless. With the Rangers and A's packing it in this season, why not give the Angels a run for their money when there's less competition in the division. It's a brilliant move when you evaluate the positives and negatives. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
WE SUCK AGAIN
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Denver
Posts: 4,976
|
I'm slightly in favor of this move, as well. I hate giving up a potential core-player like Jones but adding Bedard is a huge move. Not only are we getting an ace-caliber pitcher, but we're ridding ourselves of yet another blackhole in the rotation. No Ho Ramirez. No Jeff Weaver.
Silva's no TOR but he's got a better chance of being average than those other two sucktards. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Leucadia CA
Posts: 6,068
|
Quote:
Mariners rotation? 1. Bedard 2. Felix 3. Batista 4. Washburn 5. Silva |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
WE SUCK AGAIN
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Denver
Posts: 4,976
|
Some think that Wlad actually has as much offensive upside as Jones does, if not more. He's obviously not in Jones' ballpark in terms of the complete package, but he swings a good bat and he's progressed markedly from being a all-or-nothing, non-40 man prospect to being a more all-around hitter.
I doubt he has a chance to win a starting spot outright, but if he rakes in AAA he'll definitely be up for his offense because I don't think you can expect much from Ibanez (age) or Wilkerson (track record). As far as the rotation, I think Felix stays as the ace...or at least goes on opening day. The last three spots are in flux IMO. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
WE SUCK AGAIN
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Denver
Posts: 4,976
|
Check that...Bedard goes on opening day.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Interesting Times Ahead
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,825
|
It is debatable but off the top of my head you can say Bedard and Hernandez are the best one-two punch as far as pitching goes. I think if Pedro is healthy I'd put him and Santana above them. You can add Webb and Haren to the mix but I'd put them behind both duos.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|