Denver D - The Orange Mane

TheReverend · 09-19-2007, 01:37 PM

Is tied for #1 in the AFC for INTs with 4 (tied with Oakland)

Is tied for #4 in the AFC for sacks with 6 (tied with Houston--teams ahead:Steelers 10, Jaguars 9, New England 8)

TheReverend · 09-19-2007, 01:38 PM

Just some food for thought. Things look great right now. Either way, we can look forward to the Indy game to provide us with some answers, for better or for worse.

Rock Chalk · 09-19-2007, 01:42 PM

Playing scrubs sure does make us look good.

Let's see how we do against Indy and SD before we crown their asses.

TheChamp24 · 09-19-2007, 01:42 PM

I do like the pressure I'm seeing from our ends. Our DT's need to make a push so when the ends are coming off the edge, the QB doesn't have a wide open lane to run through. Case in point: McCown's 25 yard run Sunday. Somehow the DT's got pushed like 5 yards to their RIGHT, so when Simeon Rice pressured McCown, all he had to do was go through the 50 feet wide open hole.

telluride · 09-19-2007, 01:47 PM

J.P. Losman and Josh McCown.

Just saying.

TheReverend · 09-19-2007, 01:49 PM

*All smart ass remarks about quality of opponents please direct yourselves to post #2

TheChamp24 · 09-19-2007, 01:50 PM

I don't understand the "hate" for Losman. Last year he was solid. 3,000 yards, 60+% completion, 19 TD's and 14 INT's on a subpar Buffalo team.

Rock Chalk · 09-19-2007, 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheReverend

*All smart ass remarks about quality of opponents please direct yourselves to post #2

Which begs the question, why make post #1?

TheReverend · 09-19-2007, 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alec

Which begs the question, why make post #1?

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheReverend

*All smart ass remarks about quality of opponents please direct yourselves to post #2

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheReverend

Just some food for thought. Things look great right now. Either way, we can look forward to the Indy game to provide us with some answers, for better or for worse.

You're really not bright...

OrangeShadow · 09-19-2007, 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alec

Playing scrubs sure does make us look good.

Let's see how we do against Indy and SD before we crown their asses.

rovolution · 09-19-2007, 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrangeShadow

nice vid

sixtimeseight · 09-19-2007, 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alec

Which begs the question, why make post #1?

Please stop using this phrase incorrectly. This goes for all of you.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begging_the_question

Rock Chalk · 09-19-2007, 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheReverend

You're really not bright...

Brighter than you. I know better than to make a pointless thread about a defense that has faced two very poor offensive teams.

It wasnt a smart ass remark, it was a factual remark.

Rock Chalk · 09-19-2007, 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sixtimeseight

Please stop using this phrase incorrectly. This goes for all of you.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begging_the_question

**** you. It specifically states that the phrase in question is used colloquially as "raises the question". Just assume I was using it colloquially and shut ****in pie hole

TheReverend · 09-19-2007, 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alec

Brighter than you. I know better than to make a pointless thread about a defense that has faced two very poor offensive teams.

It wasnt a smart ass remark, it was a factual remark.

Since you're obviously retarded, let me point out some "FACTUAL REMARKS":

Primary cause for concern this off-season: #1. Defensive pressure, #2. Defensive line play, #3. Jim Bates scheme and it's affect on Champ/DBs opportunities at picks

Primary cause for concern this pre-season: MORE DEFENSE

Two weeks into the season, these are our current results, also followed up with a disclaimer that we'll have REAL answers when we play Indy in week 4.

Rock Chalk · 09-19-2007, 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheReverend

Since you're obviously retarded, let me point out some "FACTUAL REMARKS":

Primary cause for concern this off-season: #1. Defensive pressure, #2. Defensive line play, #3. Jim Bates scheme and it's affect on Champ/DBs opportunities at picks

Primary cause for concern this pre-season: MORE DEFENSE

Two weeks into the season, these are our current results, also followed up with a disclaimer that we'll have REAL answers when we play Indy in week 4.

Against piss poor teams.

Then you compare to New England who has faced two much better offenses than Buffalo and Oakland.

A pointless thread with pointless stats that concludes absolutely nothing except that we can handle ****ty teams. Unfortunately, ****ty teams (except KC last year) dnt make the playoffs.

Orange_Beard · 09-19-2007, 02:37 PM

if teams can run the ball into field goal range it won't matter

TheReverend · 09-19-2007, 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alec

Against piss poor teams.

Then you compare to New England who has faced two much better offenses than Buffalo and Oakland.

A pointless thread with pointless stats that concludes absolutely nothing except that we can handle ****ty teams. Unfortunately, ****ty teams (except KC last year) dnt make the playoffs.

I'm sorry, I guess this isn't a broncos message board until the playoffs start... I could've sworn this someplace where we address bronco football, our likes, concerns and discuss them.

How did Champ Bailey make the pro bowl last year when none of those interceptions came off Peyton Manning/Tom Brady so they obviously don't count!

eddie mac · 09-19-2007, 02:58 PM

61-312-1 5.1 avg

Those stats should scare the **** out of anyone. Can you guess what they are

Stormontheplains · 09-19-2007, 03:02 PM

rushing yards against

TheReverend · 09-19-2007, 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eddie mac

61-312-1 5.1 avg

Those stats should scare the **** out of anyone. Can you guess what they are

Were you expecting losing Al Wilson to be that smooth of a transition in the first couple weeks?

sixtimeseight · 09-19-2007, 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alec

**** you. It specifically states that the phrase in question is used colloquially as "raises the question". Just assume I was using it colloquially and shut ****in pie hole

Then just say "raises the question" and you won't look like such an uneducated dullard.

PLOWHORSE · 09-19-2007, 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sixtimeseight

Then just say "raises the question" and you won't look like such an uneducated dullard.

Alec is far from being a "dullard"...great usage of the word dullard though.

listopencil · 09-19-2007, 03:52 PM

Cutler is on pace to make 19 fourth quarter comebacks this year, the last being in the SB. So he'll break Elway's record some time late in his eighth year on the way to his eighth straight Super Bowl win. Or, the sample size could be too small and there are too many variables ahead to get an accurate read just yet. You decide.

Atwater His Ass · 09-19-2007, 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alec

Against piss poor teams.

Then you compare to New England who has faced two much better offenses than Buffalo and Oakland.

A pointless thread with pointless stats that concludes absolutely nothing except that we can handle ****ty teams. Unfortunately, ****ty teams (except KC last year) dnt make the playoffs.

Like, so you just play stupid on the internet for fun or what?

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

09-19-2007, 01:37 PM	#1
TheReverend www.PatrickTurley.org ^ buy this... twice Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Jacksonville, FL Posts: 33,026 Adopt-a-Bronco: Mike Shanahan	Denver D Is tied for #1 in the AFC for INTs with 4 (tied with Oakland) Is tied for #4 in the AFC for sacks with 6 (tied with Houston--teams ahead:Steelers 10, Jaguars 9, New England 8)

09-19-2007, 01:38 PM	#2
TheReverend www.PatrickTurley.org ^ buy this... twice Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Jacksonville, FL Posts: 33,026 Adopt-a-Bronco: Mike Shanahan	Just some food for thought. Things look great right now. Either way, we can look forward to the Indy game to provide us with some answers, for better or for worse.

09-19-2007, 01:42 PM	#3
Rock Chalk Cheeky Bastards Laus Deo Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: The Backside of the Internet Posts: 29,940 Adopt-a-Bronco: Chris Harris	Playing scrubs sure does make us look good. Let's see how we do against Indy and SD before we crown their asses.

09-19-2007, 01:42 PM	#4
TheChamp24 DERP DERP DERP The Legend Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Broncos Country Posts: 4,875	I do like the pressure I'm seeing from our ends. Our DT's need to make a push so when the ends are coming off the edge, the QB doesn't have a wide open lane to run through. Case in point: McCown's 25 yard run Sunday. Somehow the DT's got pushed like 5 yards to their RIGHT, so when Simeon Rice pressured McCown, all he had to do was go through the 50 feet wide open hole.

09-19-2007, 01:47 PM	#5
telluride Ring of Famer Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 2,557 Adopt-a-Bronco: --Rulon!--	J.P. Losman and Josh McCown. Just saying.

09-19-2007, 01:49 PM	#6
TheReverend www.PatrickTurley.org ^ buy this... twice Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Jacksonville, FL Posts: 33,026 Adopt-a-Bronco: Mike Shanahan	*All smart ass remarks about quality of opponents please direct yourselves to post #2

09-19-2007, 01:50 PM	#7
TheChamp24 DERP DERP DERP The Legend Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Broncos Country Posts: 4,875	I don't understand the "hate" for Losman. Last year he was solid. 3,000 yards, 60+% completion, 19 TD's and 14 INT's on a subpar Buffalo team.

09-19-2007, 02:37 PM	#17
Orange_Beard Over Jay Cutler Todd Snider Rules! Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Leucadia, CA Posts: 7,836 Adopt-a-Bronco: Tony Scheffler	if teams can run the ball into field goal range it won't matter

09-19-2007, 02:58 PM	#19
eddie mac Ireland's No1 Bronco Eddie Mac 87 gone but never forgott Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: IRELAND Posts: 15,572 Adopt-a-Bronco: Rod Smith	61-312-1 5.1 avg Those stats should scare the **** out of anyone. Can you guess what they are

09-19-2007, 03:02 PM	#20
Stormontheplains Ring of Famer Join Date: May 2006 Location: Bronco Nation Posts: 1,001 Adopt-a-Bronco: Andre Hall	rushing yards against

09-19-2007, 03:52 PM	#24
listopencil [sarcasm]text[/sarcasm] BOOM! Winner. Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: The People's Republic Of California Posts: 8,580 Adopt-a-Bronco: Broncos FO	Cutler is on pace to make 19 fourth quarter comebacks this year, the last being in the SB. So he'll break Elway's record some time late in his eighth year on the way to his eighth straight Super Bowl win. Or, the sample size could be too small and there are too many variables ahead to get an accurate read just yet. You decide.