The Orange Mane -  a Denver Broncos Fan Community  

Go Back   The Orange Mane - a Denver Broncos Fan Community > Orange Mane Discussion > Orange Mane Central Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Chat Room Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-16-2007, 06:42 PM   #1
WoodMan
Ring of Famer
 
WoodMan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Gulf Coast of Mississippi
Posts: 1,327
Default Chugger's Eric Parker out 10 weeks

http://www.profootballweekly.com/STA...PlayerNews.asp
Eric Parker, WR (SD.)
Parker attended Chargers' practice on Wednesday and appeared to be in good spirits, despite being out for up to 10 weeks due to surgery on his right big toe, according to the North County Times.
Parker injured the toe during a minicamp in June. Parker, entering his sixth NFL season, is best-known for his double-muff while trying to field a punt in San Diego's 24-21 home playoff loss to New England. He caught 48 passes for 659 yards and no touchdowns last season. He has 152 receptions over the past three seasons.


This is going to hurt their offense.
WoodMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 08-16-2007, 07:11 PM   #2
sixtimeseight
Ring of Famer
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,872
Default

Man, they went from 1 mediocore receiver and a bunch of crap to 0 mediocore receivers and a bunch of crap. Are LT and Gates both going to have 100+ receptions this year?
sixtimeseight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2007, 07:16 PM   #3
Inkana7
Ring of Famer
 
Inkana7's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,232

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Derek Wolfe
Default

Teh Cr41g Dav15!!!!
Inkana7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2007, 07:19 PM   #4
dbfan4life
Ring of Famer
 

Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Las Cruces, NM
Posts: 2,499
Default

Their recievers aren't a big part of their offense anyway. We have a "scrub" reciever or two that we can trade. I'm sure whoever we sent them would be good for at least 48 and 659.
dbfan4life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2007, 07:48 PM   #5
400HZ
Ring of Famer
 
400HZ's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,345

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Ed Hochuli
Default

Old news. The Chargers are really counting on Malcom Floyd, Vincent Jackson, and Craig Davis to take a big step forward this year. 3rd year, 2nd year, and 1st year players. Our team is so damn young!!! Legedu Naanee will probably contribute some too. Another 1st year guy. Fortunately Eric Parker should be back and close to 100% by the playoffs to offer some experience, even if his experience in the playoffs last year was dismal.
400HZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2007, 08:11 PM   #6
Paladin
Ring of Famer
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 9,150
Default

Maybe the sparkies won't make the playoffs this year......


Juat saying.....
Paladin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2007, 08:18 PM   #7
MechanicalBull
Interesting Times Ahead
 
MechanicalBull's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,825
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 400HZ View Post
Old news. The Chargers are really counting on Malcom Floyd, Vincent Jackson, and Craig Davis to take a big step forward this year. 3rd year, 2nd year, and 1st year players. Our team is so damn young!!! Legedu Naanee will probably contribute some too. Another 1st year guy. Fortunately Eric Parker should be back and close to 100% by the playoffs to offer some experience, even if his experience in the playoffs last year was dismal.
I was just going to say isn't this old news and wasn't he going to be the #3 or 4 wr anyway behind Jackson, Floyd and Davis. With Gates and LT he probably wasn't going to get that many balls thrown his way anyway.
MechanicalBull is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2007, 08:20 PM   #8
boltaneer
17
 
boltaneer's Avatar
 
ATTA BABY!

Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: America's Finest City
Posts: 4,068
Default

The loss of Parker concerns me. But the other guys have been stepping up. Davis has looked great in training camp (just don't run any end arounds with him just yet) and Floyd and Jackson have looked improved as well.

I think the Chargers have a very interesting WR corps despite being relative nobodys. Parker is the hard working, underestimated possession receiver. Not physically gifted but runs great routes and is very reliable on 3rd downs. Davis is the burner and is already being praised heavily on his ability to get separation. Jackson and Floyd are kind of in between. They have great size and height and can stretch a defense on occasion but are also decent possession receivers. Naanee has already shown flashes that he could be another Gates-like gem in the rough.

Lots of different skill sets for Norv to work with. The young receivers are really going to have to step it up though.
boltaneer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2007, 01:01 PM   #9
400HZ
Ring of Famer
 
400HZ's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,345

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Ed Hochuli
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MechanicalBull View Post
I was just going to say isn't this old news and wasn't he going to be the #3 or 4 wr anyway behind Jackson, Floyd and Davis. With Gates and LT he probably wasn't going to get that many balls thrown his way anyway.
I'm not sure. Last year San Diego didn't have #1, #2, etc in the traditional sense. McCardell and Parker were the starters, but when our receiver corps was still intact all 4 receivers saw close to the same amount of time on the field. Jackson and Floyd subbed in when we got inside the red zone, and also on obvious run downs. Eric Parker was a lot better than he got credit for, but his performance against New England dropped him a peg. Norval said that he was going to use Parker mainly in the slot this year.

While I'm not entirely sold on Vincent Jackson yet, I really like Malcom Floyd and like everybody else I'm really excited about Craig Davis. My gut feeling is that losing Eric Parker is going to hurt us, but in the long run it will be good to give the other receivers more time on the field since they all have higher ceilings.
400HZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2007, 03:49 PM   #10
Dean
Solid Starter
 

Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 213
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 400HZ View Post
My gut feeling is that losing Eric Parker is going to hurt us, but in the long run it will be good to give the other receivers more time on the field since they all have higher ceilings.
The problem with that is that this isn't intramurals. Giving the "other receivers more time on the field" often comes at a price in the win/loss column.
Dean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2007, 03:55 PM   #11
400HZ
Ring of Famer
 
400HZ's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,345

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Ed Hochuli
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean View Post
The problem with that is that this isn't intramurals. Giving the "other receivers more time on the field" often comes at a price in the win/loss column.
It may, but I think San Diego has some room for error this season. I mean damn, we could have lost 5 more games last season and still won the division. If it hurts us in the regular season but gives us an advantage in January then I am all for it.
400HZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2007, 04:00 PM   #12
bronco militia
Ring of Famer
 
bronco militia's Avatar
 
THE GREATEST

Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: colorado springs, co
Posts: 22,591
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 400HZ View Post
It may, but I think San Diego has some room for error this season.
oh, so that's how you Bolt fans are rationalizing this years offseason

bronco militia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2007, 04:02 PM   #13
theAPAOps5
A new beginning!
 
theAPAOps5's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 26,058

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Watermock - RIP
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bronco militia View Post
oh, so that's how you Bolt fans are rationalizing this years offseason


San Diego's WR corps wasn't great last year either. Not defending them but they have the best TE and the best player in the NFL. I don't think this will hurt them as much as we could hope.
theAPAOps5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2007, 04:10 PM   #14
bronco militia
Ring of Famer
 
bronco militia's Avatar
 
THE GREATEST

Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: colorado springs, co
Posts: 22,591
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ApaOps5 View Post
San Diego's WR corps wasn't great last year either. Not defending them but they have the best TE and the best player in the NFL. I don't think this will hurt them as much as we could hope.
there isn't any doubt in my mind that they won't miss Parker that much...

just taking liberties with that post
bronco militia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2007, 04:11 PM   #15
broncosteven
The Kranz Dictum
 
broncosteven's Avatar
 
MWA: Flight Director

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Tranquility Base
Posts: 29,056

Adopt-a-Bronco:
MONEYBALL #38
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ApaOps5 View Post
San Diego's WR corps wasn't great last year either. Not defending them but they have the best TE and the best player in the NFL. I don't think this will hurt them as much as we could hope.
The big question is which Rivers shows up?

The December/Jan Rivers that looked lost out there, or the accurate guy from the early part of season.

If he cannot get WR's to bail him out it could be a long year for Norv and crew.
broncosteven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2007, 04:26 PM   #16
400HZ
Ring of Famer
 
400HZ's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,345

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Ed Hochuli
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by broncosteven View Post
The big question is which Rivers shows up?

The December/Jan Rivers that looked lost out there, or the accurate guy from the early part of season.

If he cannot get WR's to bail him out it could be a long year for Norv and crew.
Keep in mind we beat both Seattle and KC (2 playoff teams) even when Rivers had no receivers and was playing like crap.
400HZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2007, 04:32 PM   #17
theAPAOps5
A new beginning!
 
theAPAOps5's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 26,058

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Watermock - RIP
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bronco militia View Post
there isn't any doubt in my mind that they won't miss Parker that much...

just taking liberties with that post
True, I lost my head there for a second. I will not neglect taking a chance to smack talk again.
theAPAOps5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2007, 04:47 PM   #18
broncosteven
The Kranz Dictum
 
broncosteven's Avatar
 
MWA: Flight Director

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Tranquility Base
Posts: 29,056

Adopt-a-Bronco:
MONEYBALL #38
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 400HZ View Post
Keep in mind we beat both Seattle and KC (2 playoff teams) even when Rivers had no receivers and was playing like crap.
I am sure Norv will make things even Better!
broncosteven is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes



Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:11 AM.


Denver Broncos