Hypocrite gay republicans, beaware.

[Atlas]

Brokeback Hill

Mike Rogers has outed so many closeted gay politicos, he's starting to make Capitol Hill look like Brokeback Mountain.

SoCals link: http://potw.news.yahoo.com/s/potw/51/brokeback-hill

By KEVIN SITES, WED MAY 30, 12:31 PM PDT

WASHINGTON - Members of the 110th Congress consider yourselves warned: Mike Rogers is making his list.

Rogers is a muckraking gay blogger who uses his insider's knowledge of Washington politics and broad blanket of contacts to "out" gay politicos — but only, he says, if they are undermining gay rights. Critics call his tactics divisive and politically motivated.

Mike Rogers says his blog exposes hypocrisy in government.

Rogers, a longtime gay activist, started blogactive.com in 2004, using it to yank out of the closet at least two dozen high-ranking political figures, including senators, congressmen and Bush administration officials.

He's outed so many closeted gay politicos, he's starting to make Capitol Hill look like Brokeback Mountain. All of them, he says, use their positions to actively oppose the equal rights of gay citizens while at the same time, secretly live a gay life.

If you are a gay politico with something to hide, the left hand column of Roger's Web site is exactly where you don't want to see your name. He calls it "the list."

Former Rep. Mark Foley is on the list. Rogers wrote about him in March 2005, almost two years before the scandal that forced him to resign. "I reported on him hitting on younger men, said he was a danger to the community," he says.

Evidence emerged later that the conservative Florida Republican was sending sexually explicit emails to former young male congressional pages. Two claimed to have also had sex with Foley after they had left their jobs as pages.

"For me," Rogers says, "what it's really about is if congressman X thinks that gay people shouldn't have equal rights but goes home and is having sex with men, and not disclosing that, then we have a problem."

Rogers also blogged about Dan Gurley, the former national field director of the Republican National Committee — and a rising G.O.P. star.

Rogers says he targeted Gurley because of a divisive RNC flyer with a photo showing one man on bended knee, proposing to another — an attempt to use gay marriage as a wedge issue in conservative states.

Rogers says the flyers sowed hate — and Gurley, a gay man, approved it. Gurley denies he was responsible for the flyer or its distribution.

"I was aware of the flyer and I raised objections to it," he says. "I actually pointed it out to several individuals, [saying] that I thought it crossed a line, that I was uncomfortable with it."

But Rogers kept the heat on Gurley, linking to a profile Gurley kept on gay.com.

Dan Gurley has left politics but still calls himself a Republican.
“He was using the Internet to seek multiple partners for unprotected sex,” says Rogers.

Gurley says he had been in line for a job with the Bush Administration, but after Roger's posting, he was told to look elsewhere.

"Who did you blame," I ask him, "Rogers or the administration?"

"I think there is probably blame to go around, including myself," he says.

Gurley says the episode shook him up to the point of re-examining his beliefs, but in the end, he says he's still a Republican.

"For me what it's really about is if congressman X thinks that gay people shouldn't have equal rights but goes home and is having sex with men, and not disclosing that, then we have a problem." — Mike Rogers

People have called Rogers a gay terrorist, but he says, "The only people who say things like that are people who have a vested interest in protecting the closet."

"I feel more sad for [the people I out] than anger," Rogers says. "... That they are in this position, that they are self-loathing, willing to wake up everyday and go to work against the very community they are a member of is quite shocking."

Many gay organizations are troubled by outing but stop short of condemning it. The Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation "doesn't encourage outing, period," says GLAAD's Rashad Robinson. "But there is an argument that can be made — and many make it — for holding closeted political figures who attack and exploit gay people and our families for political gain accountable for their actions."

However, the Log Cabin Republicans, a gay Republican group, disagree. "Log Cabin is strongly against outing," says its president, Patrick Sammon. "It is unproductive and motivated by vengeance. It does nothing to further the cause of equality for gay and lesbian Americans."

In front of the Capitol building, Rogers says, "I think there need to be folks like me standing out here, pointing their fingers and saying, 'Clean up your act.'"

He adds that members of the 110th Congress should keep an eye out for his list.

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

Ha ha ha!

"Brokeback Hill."

That's rich.

[cutthemdown]

THis is pretty funny, but in the long run all it will do is scare homosexuals that want to not be outed to not go into politics. In the long run homosexuals in the republican party is probably good for gay rights. Outing them and the leave just makes the Republicans more to the right. I agree it makes you a hypocrit if you say in one breath gay people are bad and at same time are gay. I doubt that this guy cares though if the person is really a hypocrit. He only cares if they are republican.

[TailgateNut]

Originally Posted by cutthemdown

. I doubt that this guy cares though if the person is really a hypocrit. He only cares if they are republican.

Isn't that part of the "republican pledge" to the cause!

[Smiling Assassin27]

This is actually a farce. His first assumption is that just because a gay politician who's married to a woman nails a guy, that he also must support gay marriage as an 'equal right'. This logic is flawed because the premises are wrong. It is possible to believe that homsexuals should be treated with the same dignity as any other human without believing they should be specifically protected or provided with 'rights' as if they were a race of people.

Granted, there are hypocrites who condemn gay people, but there are also people who rebuke the openly gay lifestyle as sinful but do not condemn anyone to hell for it.

Finally, if you don't want this dude on your back (pun intended), then do what you say and say what you do.

[BroncoBuff]

There were always whispers about a gay 'cabal' within Reagan's first-term 'true-believers,' the supply-siders, etc. I heard a rumor on KOA years ago that Ralph Reed was even in on that. Apparently the refugees of that cabal later formed "The Log Cabin Republicans."

I hope this thing breaks wide open, so society can get over this prejudice. If people knew about Anderson Cooper, Matthew McConaughey, Pete Townsend, Jodie Foster, Ryan Seacrest, John Travolta and other high-profile gays - the same way they know about Mary Cheney - the prejudice would disappear very quickly. Or for O-Maners, how about Adam Schefter, Dave Logan and Dave Krieger? And that Baltimore Oriole player a few years ago .... I never even learned who it was. It's a shame.

In a recent poll of active-duty soldiers, they overwhelmingly said they don't care one way or the other. The younger generation seems to view homnosexuality the way we looked at left-handedness. No big deal.




The day this prejudice is defeated by a broad, societal acclimation - is the day the human race takes a big step forward.

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

Originally Posted by BroncoBuff

There were always whispers about a gay 'cabal' within Reagan's first-term 'true-believers,' the supply-siders, etc.

More than just whispers, bro.

[BroncoBuff]

DAMN!

Nice find LABF!!!!!! ($150 seems a little cheap though, doesn't it?)








(Anything on the Ralph Reed rumor?)

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

Originally Posted by BroncoBuff

($150 seems a little cheap though, doesn't it?)