![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Vermont
Posts: 1,211
Adopt-a-Bronco: Bay Bay |
I'm sure someone will pop a link. Coming down from King Goodell's desk, no booze at NFL Team functions, bus trips or flights. Man, are we getting a little touchy?......
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Drama and Mediocrity
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Newark, NJ
Posts: 5,989
Adopt-a-Bronco: DJ |
Booze isnt the problem
Maybe we should start with banning dogfights, "making it rain" at strip clubs, carrying firearms and getting rid of aggravated assault if only booze was the problem, it would be simple |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Who wants LOBSTER!!!
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 711
Adopt-a-Bronco: Is FONECO taken |
They're following the lead of MLB. Some teams have banned beer in the lockerroom after games and on flights. All the DUIs must be curbed somehow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Giving You The Business
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Huntersville, NC
Posts: 5,588
Adopt-a-Bronco: Woodyard |
They can't get their goose on anymore
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Rock-N-Roll Historian
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: W.NY.B.C.
Posts: 21,300
Adopt-a-Bronco: Floyd Little |
It's become increasingly obivous that the maturity level of the players in general has sunk to an arguable all time low....so, as unfortunate as it is, the move makes total sense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
The Kranz Dictum
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Tranquility Base
Posts: 29,001
Adopt-a-Bronco: MONEYBALL #38 |
I can do without Booze. Opiates is another story.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,360
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
Booze isn't illegal, so I don't see where the NFL has the right to ban it. I find it hard to believe that these atheletes and coaches can't arrange transportation one way or another if they are going to be drinking. It isn't that hard, yet time and time again they f it up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: colorado springs, co
Posts: 22,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
The Kranz Dictum
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Tranquility Base
Posts: 29,001
Adopt-a-Bronco: MONEYBALL #38 |
Quote:
It is Ok for Romo's & Farverers to bring in controlled substances but they cannot get a buzz on during a couple hour flight? Just shows the bad apples spoiling everything for the whole bunch. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Orange
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 8,038
Adopt-a-Bronco: dortoh |
Ok, I'm only going off of what I know about the legalities of an employer providing liquor at company sponsored functions. But, if an employee obtains liquor while at, say, a company Christmas party, goes out and drives drunk, then partial responsibility lies with the company and they become a legal target. Most functions of a certain level sponsored by a company would require some sort of temporary liquor license (say company picnic) or an extension of an insurance policy. I've had to deal with this before on two occasions. Both occasions mentioned above.
I would extend that if the NFL allows alcohol at league sponsored events and so forth, then they become partially responsible and must carry proper insurance, have proper licensing and so forth. That's a very large burdon to carry. For instance, most employers would have a drug and alcohol policy that would extend to a certain degree on what level of travel and functions the company would require of it's employees. Some employers choose to overlook some of these requirements either because they just are uninformed or they just don't care and are willing to take the risk. Anyway, that's probably a good basis for what Goodell is going from. Like it or not, the league does have some sort of responsibility for players actions when providing or allowing alcohol while on league property, etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Self Appointed Expert
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 25,136
Adopt-a-Bronco: Miss I |
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Hokie since 1993
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 45,987
Adopt-a-Bronco: Tom Jackson |
Hmmmmmm seems one toke over the line to generically name team functions. I would imagine that flights should be fine. But I guess if someone wanted to drink bad enough they still could.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Got trolls?
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Tampa Bay
Posts: 13,810
Adopt-a-Bronco: Brady Quinn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
armed
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,771
|
you guys give up to easily
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Don't Argue With Me
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 5,023
Adopt-a-Bronco: Darris Nash |
Such a policy would never work for baseball. Showering the locker room with champagne after winning a championship is to baseball what dousing the head coach with Gatorade is to football. Except it has a longer tradition and is far more dignified than dumping gallons of a chilled beverage on a 60-year-old man in 10-degree weather.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,736
|
Lame rule. Totally lame.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
17
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: America's Finest City
Posts: 4,064
|
Quote:
But it just doesn't make a whole lot of sense since since as far as I know, there haven't been a rash of incidents at any team functions, bus rides and team flights. These are not the places where players are getting into trouble. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|