OT: The Surprising Truth Behind the Construction of the Great Pyramids

[alkemical]

The Surprising Truth Behind the Construction of the Great Pyramids

This Behind the Scenes article was provided to LiveScience in partnership with the National Science Foundation.

"This is not my day job." So begins Michel Barsoum as he recounts his foray into the mysteries of the Great Pyramids of Egypt. As a well respected researcher in the field of ceramics, Barsoum never expected his career to take him down a path of history, archaeology, and "political" science, with materials research mixed in.

As a distinguished professor in the Department of Materials Science and Engineering at Drexel University, his daily routine consists mainly of teaching students about ceramics, or performing research on a new class of materials, the so-called MAX Phases, that he and his colleagues discovered in the 1990s. These modern ceramics are machinable, thermal-shock resistant, and are better conductors of heat and electricity than many metals-making them potential candidates for use in nuclear power plants, the automotive industry, jet engines, and a range of other high-demand systems.

Then Barsoum received an unexpected phone call from Michael Carrell, a friend of a retired colleague of Barsoum, who called to chat with the Egyptian-born Barsoum about how much he knew of the mysteries surrounding the building of the Great Pyramids of Giza, the only remaining of the seven wonders of the ancient world.

The widely accepted theory-that the pyramids were crafted of carved-out giant limestone blocks that workers carried up ramps-had not only not been embraced by everyone, but as important had quite a number of holes.

Burst out laughing

According to the caller, the mysteries had actually been solved by Joseph Davidovits, Director of the Geopolymer Institute in St. Quentin, France, more than two decades ago. Davidovits claimed that the stones of the pyramids were actually made of a very early form of concrete created using a mixture of limestone, clay, lime, and water.

"It was at this point in the conversation that I burst out laughing," says Barsoum. If the pyramids were indeed cast, he says, someone should have proven it beyond a doubt by now, in this day and age, with just a few hours of electron microscopy.

It turned out that nobody had completely proven the theory...yet.

"What started as a two-hour project turned into a five-year odyssey that I undertook with one of my graduate students, Adrish Ganguly, and a colleague in France, Gilles Hug," Barsoum says.

A year and a half later, after extensive scanning electron microscope (SEM) observations and other testing, Barsoum and his research group finally began to draw some conclusions about the pyramids. They found that the tiniest structures within the inner and outer casing stones were indeed consistent with a reconstituted limestone. The cement binding the limestone aggregate was either silicon dioxide (the building block of quartz) or a calcium and magnesium-rich silicate mineral.

The stones also had a high water content-unusual for the normally dry, natural limestone found on the Giza plateau-and the cementing phases, in both the inner and outer casing stones, were amorphous, in other words, their atoms were not arranged in a regular and periodic array. Sedimentary rocks such as limestone are seldom, if ever, amorphous.

The sample chemistries the researchers found do not exist anywhere in nature. "Therefore," says Barsoum, "it's very improbable that the outer and inner casing stones that we examined were chiseled from a natural limestone block."

More startlingly, Barsoum and another of his graduate students, Aaron Sakulich, recently discovered the presence of silicon dioxide nanoscale spheres (with diameters only billionths of a meter across) in one of the samples. This discovery further confirms that these blocks are not natural limestone.

Generations misled

At the end of their most recent paper reporting these findings, the researchers reflect that it is "ironic, sublime and truly humbling" that this 4,500-year-old limestone is so true to the original that it has misled generations of Egyptologists and geologists and, "because the ancient Egyptians were the original-albeit unknowing-nanotechnologists."

As if the scientific evidence isn't enough, Barsoum has pointed out a number of common sense reasons why the pyramids were not likely constructed entirely of chiseled limestone blocks.

Egyptologists are consistently confronted by unanswered questions: How is it possible that some of the blocks are so perfectly matched that not even a human hair can be inserted between them? Why, despite the existence of millions of tons of stone, carved presumably with copper chisels, has not one copper chisel ever been found on the Giza Plateau?

Although Barsoum's research has not answered all of these questions, his work provides insight into some of the key questions. For example, it is now more likely than not that the tops of the pyramids are cast, as it would have been increasingly difficult to drag the stones to the summit.

Also, casting would explain why some of the stones fit so closely together. Still, as with all great mysteries, not every aspect of the pyramids can be explained. How the Egyptians hoisted 70-ton granite slabs halfway up the great pyramid remains as mysterious as ever.

Why do the results of Barsoum's research matter most today? Two words: earth cements.

"How energy intensive and/or complicated can a 4,500 year old technology really be? The answer to both questions is not very," Barsoum explains. "The basic raw materials used for this early form of concrete-limestone, lime, and diatomaceous earth-can be found virtually anywhere in the world," he adds. "Replicating this method of construction would be cost effective, long lasting, and much more environmentally friendly than the current building material of choice: Portland cement that alone pumps roughly 6 billion tons of CO2 annually into the atmosphere when it's manufactured."

"Ironically," says Barsoum, "this study of 4,500 year old rocks is not about the past, but about the future."

[theAPAOps5]

Awesome stuff, I love your science posts.

[alkemical]

I found this to be pretty cool. So thanks for being interested - i figure enough people are intrigued with the Giza Pyramids that it'd garner Mane Forum interest.

[theAPAOps5]

My stepdad is stationed in Egypt training the Egyptian pilots how to fly the Apache Helicopter. I'll have to tell him about this story.

[alkemical]

That's a pretty cool job.

[Atwater His Ass]

That's a neat article. It never occured to me that perhaps the stones were cast.

Overall, it is very intriguing that we can't figure out how something built about 4,500 years ago was constructed.

[bendog]

I think you're going to Hell to burn eternally for not accepting the unerring and literal truth, as revealed by our ONE TRUE GOD (-:

(I like Jim Bob and John Boy's Church of the Sword of Joshua too.)

I've never thought the Jews did this. I mean for one reason, if the Jews were really involved in building these things, they'd own Egypt today. The legal contracts would be iron clad.

But how'd they cast this stuff? Seriously the pyrimids are one reason I've never fully discounted the UFO stuff.

[plummershelper]

I have a buddy going over to Egypt in a week. He's a huge Bronco's fan and he's vowed to have pics of Bronco's stuff on famous landmarks.

[alkemical]

Originally Posted by bendog

I think you're going to Hell to burn eternally for not accepting the unerring and literal truth, as revealed by our ONE TRUE GOD (-:

(I like Jim Bob and John Boy's Church of the Sword of Joshua too.)

I've never thought the Jews did this. I mean for one reason, if the Jews were really involved in building these things, they'd own Egypt today. The legal contracts would be iron clad.

But how'd they cast this stuff? Seriously the pyrimids are one reason I've never fully discounted the UFO stuff.

I have no clue ben dog.

[Rohirrim]

This is obviously false. They didn't haven't cement trucks back then.

[Paladin]

Originally Posted by Rohirrim

This is obviously false. They didn't haven't cement trucks back then.

[Los Broncos]

I love stuff like this, good find.

[Los Broncos]

Originally Posted by Rohirrim

This is obviously false. They didn't haven't cement trucks back then.