My Mock - with trade

[Cool Breeze]

Somewhere between wishful thinking and stretching it a bit is my crapshoot mock.
I figured I'd put this up for a few laughs -
Lord knows I 've had a few reading yours...

Lets say Denver doesn't like who's there @ 21 - and propose a trade to New England for their #28 + #91 (660+136=796) + Sauerbrun Vs 800 for #21. New England likes a receiver, safety, or corner - whatever...

Any one should be there, so I'll do this smorgasboard style:
#28 - Jarvis Moss DE, Joe Staley OT, Micheal Griffen S, Justin Harrell DT

#56 - David Harris LB, Brandon Siler LB, Eric Weddle S, Ray McDonald DE, Jason Hill WR
#70 - Quentin Moses DE, Josh Gattis S, Aundray Allison WR, Darius Walker RB
#86 - Brandon Mebane DT, Marcus Thomas DT, Doug Free OT
#91 - Mason Crosby K, A J Davis CB, John Wendling S
#176 - Tim Duckworth OG, Laurent Robinson WR, Yamon Figures WR
#198 - Gabe Hall OT, David Patterson DT
#223 - Jordan Kent WR, Anthony Waters LB

Thanks in advance for the feedback...

[chaz]

not a bad mock and not all that unrealistic...although i believe ssauerbrun has a no trade clause in his contract but even without him its a pretty fair deal-looks like he might be a FA now sometime soon anyways. love anthony waters in rounds 6 or 7, reallly think he could be huge

[Steve Prefontaine]

Originally Posted by chaz

although i believe ssauerbrun has a no trade clause in his contract but even without him

I might be wrong, but I'm pretty sure he can waive the no-trade clause if there is a trade proposal that he approves.

[blake0052]

forget sauerbrun...let's go after Sepulveda with # 91. That pick will solve our field position shortcomings for years

[JCMElway]

Originally Posted by blake0052

forget sauerbrun...let's go after Sepulveda with # 91. That pick will solve our field position shortcomings for years

91 is too high for Sepu. I think we can spend the late 6th on Podlesh. He's just as good!

[SonOfLe-loLang]

Yeah, Sepulveda is kind of inconsistent