The Orange Mane -  a Denver Broncos Fan Community  

Go Back   The Orange Mane - a Denver Broncos Fan Community > Orange Mane Discussion > Orange Mane Central Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Chat Room Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-01-2007, 01:06 AM   #1
footstepsfrom#27
helmet to helmet hitter
 
footstepsfrom#27's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 16,117

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Joe Mays
Default If Cowher retires...should we raid the Steelers staff?

It looks like a fairly decent possibility that the Jaw calls it quits if rumors prove true. Some people think that OC Ken Whisenhunt might replace him...but just in case the Steelers look outside the organization for a new coach...should we go get DC Dick LeBeau or some other Steeler coaches? You got to like how their defense is built...big, physical and aggressive...or should we stick with Coyer? Personally I really like LeBeau and O-Line coach Russ Grimm as well. I'm tired of the zone blocking scheme anyway. What do you think?

Discuss...
footstepsfrom#27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 01-01-2007, 01:08 AM   #2
go_broncos
Ring of Famer
 
**** you Bill Vinovich

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 5,218

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Rod Smith
Default

if coyer is our d-coordinator next year, the result will be the same as of this year.
go_broncos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2007, 01:08 AM   #3
yavoon
Ring of Famer
 

Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 10,260
Default

I likie
yavoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2007, 01:12 AM   #4
bloodsunday
Ring of Famer
 
Nothing lasts forever.

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Dove Valley
Posts: 5,839

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Spencer Larsen
Default

No. They run totally different schemes. If we can take Lebeau and their entire defensive roster (they run the 3 - 4), then maybe. But since we don't run the 3 - 4 and aren't likely to convert in one season, I think its a horrible idea.

I might be inclined to look at some offensive line help in the coaching ranks. I also would be inclined to demote or fire either Dennison or Dinger.
bloodsunday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2007, 01:12 AM   #5
Popps
TEAM FIRST.
 
Popps's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 29,785
Default

There's nothing wrong with the zone blocking scheme. It's just another scheme that, when executed correctly... produces results.

Missing Lepsis hurt us, and that waste of space on the other side is a liability.

Add to that... we don't have a complete running back. Mike Bell just doesn't have enough pop, and we all know Tatum's story. We need some talent infused to that line. I even think missing Sapp hurt us a little.

We need a short-yardage back, a true bruiser in the Bettis mold, even if it's a specialist like Zach Crockett. (I've always wished we had that dude.)

Then, we need a complete running back. Nash is the closest thing we have and he's apparently a ****head.

As for the defense... I wouldn't shed a single tear of Coyer was sent packing. I'm the first to say that he needs more talent up front, but he's had 4 seasons to show something and his squads continually melt down in big games.... with today just being another example, and this wasn't even against a top flight offense.
Popps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2007, 01:17 AM   #6
bloodsunday
Ring of Famer
 
Nothing lasts forever.

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Dove Valley
Posts: 5,839

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Spencer Larsen
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Popps View Post
There's nothing wrong with the zone blocking scheme. It's just another scheme that, when executed correctly... produces results.

Missing Lepsis hurt us, and that waste of space on the other side is a liability.
I don't think this OL would miss a beat if it were:

LT - Lepsis
LG - Hamilton
C - Nalen
RG - Kuper
RT - Pears (Meadows?)

We have some talent there. It's time to let the young guys get some PT. Pears seems to have played well all things considered and could upgrade the right side when Lepsis is healthy. But another tackle would be nice to have if the right situation arises.
bloodsunday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2007, 01:22 AM   #7
footstepsfrom#27
helmet to helmet hitter
 
footstepsfrom#27's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 16,117

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Joe Mays
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bloodsunday View Post
No. They run totally different schemes. If we can take Lebeau and their entire defensive roster (they run the 3 - 4), then maybe. But since we don't run the 3 - 4 and aren't likely to convert in one season, I think its a horrible idea.
I don't see why that matters. He's been coaching 34 years and I'm sure he knows what to do with a 4-3 defense. In good years and bad, the Steelers always have defenses that hit.
footstepsfrom#27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2007, 01:24 AM   #8
footstepsfrom#27
helmet to helmet hitter
 
footstepsfrom#27's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 16,117

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Joe Mays
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Popps View Post
There's nothing wrong with the zone blocking scheme. It's just another scheme that, when executed correctly... produces results.
This O-line gets abused in pass blocking and they can't run inside the red zone. I think it's time we junk the sub-300 pound O-line guys that can only function in the zone blocking scheme.
footstepsfrom#27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2007, 01:25 AM   #9
Wes Mantooth
Ring of Famer
 
Wes Mantooth's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,446
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by footstepsfrom#27 View Post
It looks like a fairly decent possibility that the Jaw calls it quits if rumors prove true. Some people think that OC Ken Whisenhunt might replace him...but just in case the Steelers look outside the organization for a new coach...should we go get DC Dick LeBeau or some other Steeler coaches? You got to like how their defense is built...big, physical and aggressive...or should we stick with Coyer? Personally I really like LeBeau and O-Line coach Russ Grimm as well. I'm tired of the zone blocking scheme anyway. What do you think?

Discuss...
Was thinking about this the other day. You know what usually comes with coordinaters (d-coordinaters)? D-personnel that know the system! You could not pay LeBau enough!
Wes Mantooth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2007, 01:29 AM   #10
Wes Mantooth
Ring of Famer
 
Wes Mantooth's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,446
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Popps View Post
There's nothing wrong with the zone blocking scheme. It's just another scheme that, when executed correctly... produces results.

Missing Lepsis hurt us, and that waste of space on the other side is a liability.

Add to that... we don't have a complete running back. Mike Bell just doesn't have enough pop, and we all know Tatum's story. We need some talent infused to that line. I even think missing Sapp hurt us a little.

We need a short-yardage back, a true bruiser in the Bettis mold, even if it's a specialist like Zach Crockett. (I've always wished we had that dude.)

Then, we need a complete running back. Nash is the closest thing we have and he's apparently a ****head.

As for the defense... I wouldn't shed a single tear of Coyer was sent packing. I'm the first to say that he needs more talent up front, but he's had 4 seasons to show something and his squads continually melt down in big games.... with today just being another example, and this wasn't even against a top flight offense.
Totally agree. Excecuting the scheme is the problem, not the scheme itself. Didn't we win a couple of SB's with the same offensive phillosphy? Only thing really that has changed is the defensive phillosophy and the teams personell.
Wes Mantooth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2007, 01:30 AM   #11
Popps
TEAM FIRST.
 
Popps's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 29,785
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by footstepsfrom#27 View Post
This O-line gets abused in pass blocking and they can't run inside the red zone. I think it's time we junk the sub-300 pound O-line guys that can only function in the zone blocking scheme.
Yea, our pass protection is for ****. But, again... missing Lepsis hurts, and how about we just get someone who's talented to play RT, no matter how much he weighs?

We also don't have a true fullback, and our RBs are mediocre at picking up rushers.

It's not always scheme, sometimes it's talent. The difference between our O and our D is that this system has proven itself, where as our current defensive scheme has not.
Popps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2007, 01:30 AM   #12
bloodsunday
Ring of Famer
 
Nothing lasts forever.

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Dove Valley
Posts: 5,839

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Spencer Larsen
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by footstepsfrom#27 View Post
This O-line gets abused in pass blocking and they can't run inside the red zone. I think it's time we junk the sub-300 pound O-line guys that can only function in the zone blocking scheme.
The problem with that is that the sub-300 guys give us huge flexibility in the run game by getting to the second level. What we need is an elite back so that we can dictate to the D. S.F. does not have any better players than us on OL, but they controlled the game because Gore had us on our heels the whole game.
bloodsunday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2007, 01:36 AM   #13
footstepsfrom#27
helmet to helmet hitter
 
footstepsfrom#27's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 16,117

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Joe Mays
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Popps View Post
Yea, our pass protection is for ****. But, again... missing Lepsis hurts, and how about we just get someone who's talented to play RT, no matter how much he weighs?

We also don't have a true fullback, and our RBs are mediocre at picking up rushers.

It's not always scheme, sometimes it's talent. The difference between our O and our D is that this system has proven itself, where as our current defensive scheme has not.
Watch Nalen, Hamilton and Carlyle try to pass protect against 340 pound monsters in the middle. They get pushed back like rag dolls almost every play. Just as bad, they can't run block on the goal line at all...hence our problems today for example. Replacing Foster's a given. Who knows if Lepsis will recover sufficiently and Pears is an UFA protecting our future superstar's blind side. As for the FB...that's another problem too. I hate these dinky backs that can't block. Why can't we have a 260 pound sledgehammer that flattens people?
footstepsfrom#27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2007, 01:39 AM   #14
Popps
TEAM FIRST.
 
Popps's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 29,785
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bloodsunday View Post
I don't think this OL would miss a beat if it were:

LT - Lepsis
LG - Hamilton
C - Nalen
RG - Kuper
RT - Pears (Meadows?)
Yea.... still a little undersized, but we've overcome that in the past. That's a pretty talented looking line, there.

Add a true FB and a RB that can hold his own in blitz pick-up, and I think we'd be fine. But, I'm with you... if we have a chance to land a RT monster, I say we go for it.
Popps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2007, 01:39 AM   #15
footstepsfrom#27
helmet to helmet hitter
 
footstepsfrom#27's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 16,117

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Joe Mays
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bloodsunday View Post
The problem with that is that the sub-300 guys give us huge flexibility in the run game by getting to the second level. What we need is an elite back so that we can dictate to the D. S.F. does not have any better players than us on OL, but they controlled the game because Gore had us on our heels the whole game.
We don't have to play the zone blocking scheme to run the ball...but using it screws up the pass protection because these dudes are just to small to pass block....and forget runing on the goal line.

Gore was a 3rd rounder BTW...taken after D-Will. OUCH!
footstepsfrom#27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2007, 01:41 AM   #16
Wes Mantooth
Ring of Famer
 
Wes Mantooth's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,446
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by footstepsfrom#27 View Post
This O-line gets abused in pass blocking and they can't run inside the red zone. I think it's time we junk the sub-300 pound O-line guys that can only function in the zone blocking scheme.
How did our big 300+ ponder do today? Sorry, I don't buy this argument.
Wes Mantooth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2007, 01:42 AM   #17
footstepsfrom#27
helmet to helmet hitter
 
footstepsfrom#27's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 16,117

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Joe Mays
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bloodsunday View Post
I don't think this OL would miss a beat if it were:

LT - Lepsis
LG - Hamilton
C - Nalen
RG - Kuper
RT - Pears (Meadows?)
Lepsis will be 33 and coming off an injury, Hamilton's to small, Nalen's almost done, Kuper is an unknown at this point, and Pears is an UFA whose chief advantage is that he's not George Foster.

Neither am I though.
footstepsfrom#27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2007, 01:49 AM   #18
footstepsfrom#27
helmet to helmet hitter
 
footstepsfrom#27's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 16,117

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Joe Mays
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by yoakum3 View Post
How did our big 300+ ponder do today? Sorry, I don't buy this argument.
So your reasoning for not upgrading to a larger more physical line that can block on the goal line and protect Cutler is because Foster weighs over 300 pounds?

Kidding right?
footstepsfrom#27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2007, 02:03 AM   #19
Sassy
Ring of Famer
 
Sassy's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2001
Location: ND
Posts: 37,952

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Eddie Royal
Default

Screw the coaches...let's give them Tatum for Willie Parker
Sassy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2007, 02:38 AM   #20
DeusExManning
Ring of Famer
 

Join Date: May 2006
Location: Orange County
Posts: 1,336
Default

All of the Steeler coaches are great. Very little chance of getting any.
DeusExManning is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2007, 04:42 AM   #21
Florida_Bronco
Got trolls?
 
Florida_Bronco's Avatar
 
Welcome to Mile High, Brady!

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Tampa Bay
Posts: 13,810

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Brady Quinn
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by footstepsfrom#27 View Post
We don't have to play the zone blocking scheme to run the ball...but using it screws up the pass protection because these dudes are just to small to pass block....and forget runing on the goal line.

Gore was a 3rd rounder BTW...taken after D-Will. OUCH!
The zone blocking scheme is not the problem. Back when we won our Super Bowls it was the same scheme with the same style of players and we could handle goal line situations just fine.
Florida_Bronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2007, 04:48 AM   #22
Kaylore
6-37, Raider fans.
 
Kaylore's Avatar
 
Yummy birds and snow!

Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ceti Alpha V
Posts: 41,025

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Wesley Duke
Default

Both their coordinators are excellent and one of them will probably be taking over the head coaching job there next year.
Kaylore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2007, 04:52 AM   #23
Killericon
YES A DT!!!!!!
 
Killericon's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: From Calgary, in Halifax for School
Posts: 7,730

Adopt-a-Bronco:
watermock
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sassy View Post
Screw the coaches...let's give them Tatum for Willie Parker
And Nick Ferguson for Troy Polamalu!
Killericon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes



Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:52 PM.


Denver Broncos