![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,477
|
Why is it so much easier to catch a ball going out of bounds or in the end zone than it is in the middle of the field and attempting to make a football move? Why do you have to make a football move everywhere else but the sideline?
I was watching the replay of the Wiggens fumble out of bounds this last week. It got me to thinking about how if that catch where on the sideline or in the end zone, the replay booth would probably rule in favor of a completion instead of what it was. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#2 |
|
3,631 - WAKE UP!!!!
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 4,651
Adopt-a-Bronco: MJK |
I didn't see that play you are talking about, but that is crazy, you come down with two feet within a few yards of the sideline, they'll give it to you if you get blasted out of bounds and drop the ball, but within the hashes, you have to come down with the ball and "make a football move", whatever that is. I think they should change the rule so that if you come down over the middle, have two feet down and possesion, and get decked, and you drop it...
FUMMMM - BBLLLLLLLLLL |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,477
|
Quote:
I heard an argument that you have to acount for real-time motion; that a slow motion capture is not enough to rule it a catch. However, this does not hold true for end-zone and sideline grabs. I have never seen real-time examination of a play in the end zone or on the side line when reviewed. The only two factors I have ever seen is 1.) did the player have possesion? and 2.) where both feet in bounds? |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|