Rest of the season forecast - The Orange Mane

JCMElway · 11-01-2006, 11:26 AM

Are we optimistic or not?

@ Pitt -- W
@ Oakland -- W
San Diego -- W
@ KC -- L
Seattle -- W
@ San Diego -- L
@ Arizona -- W
Cincy -- W
San Fran -- W

I say 12- 4.

Hotrod · 11-01-2006, 11:30 AM

@ Pitt -- W
@ Oakland -- W
San Diego -- W
@ KC -- L
Seattle -- W
@ San Diego -- L
@ Arizona -- W
Cincy -- W
San Fran -- W

I say 12- 4.

ditto

55CrushEm · 11-01-2006, 11:32 AM

11-5.....we will also lose to Pitt this weekend......I'm a pessimist.

Orange_Beard · 11-01-2006, 11:33 AM

@ Pitt -- W
@ Oakland -- W
San Diego -- W
@ KC -- L
Seattle -- L
@ San Diego -- L
@ Arizona -- W
Cincy -- L
San Fran -- W

Seattle will be healthy.
Cincy will be a L if there is no pressure on Palmer.

defenseman · 11-01-2006, 11:33 AM

11-5...dman

WABronco · 11-01-2006, 11:37 AM

Those scenarios seem suprisingly realistic, to me anyways.

I think this next game is dangerous. Oakland's playing well, but not well enough to worry about IMO. San Diego at home should be a fight. I am also resigned to losing at KC...but wouldn't it be sweet to win one so we could tell all those trolls to STFU once and for all? Anyways, Seattle's D has gone down the ****ter of late, but they could have Hass and Alexander back (but their ground game still sucks). San Diego away is going to be a battle again. Cincy doesn't scare me as much as they used to...

12-4 sounds good...

toad · 11-01-2006, 11:50 AM

11-5 or 12-4....

kmartin575 · 11-01-2006, 11:52 AM

@ Pitt -- L
@ Oakland -- W
San Diego -- ?
@ KC -- L
Seattle -- ?
@ San Diego -- L
@ Arizona -- W
Cincy -- ?
San Fran -- W

Those three question marks are games at Denver where I think at least one of the three will be a loss for Denver. All three are high powered offenses that could give Denver trouble. Plus, all three have a hell of alot better defenses than Indianapolis so points will not be as easy to come by.

Taco John · 11-01-2006, 11:53 AM

Here's mine:

@ Pitt -- L
@ Oakland -- W
San Diego -- W
@ KC -- W
Seattle -- W
@ San Diego -- L
@ Arizona -- W <----The Cutler vs. Leinart Game! Warm up the TIVO!
Cincy -- L
San Fran -- W

11-5

Kaylore · 11-01-2006, 11:56 AM

I'd say this:

9 Sun Nov. 5 at Pittsburgh LOSS
10 Sun Nov.12 at Oakland WIN
11 Sun Nov.19 vs. San Diego WIN
12 Thu Nov.23 at Kansas City LOSS
13 Sun Dec. 3 vs. Seattle WIN
14 Sun Dec.10 at San Diego LOSS
15 Sun Dec.17 at Arizona WIN
16 Sun Dec.24 vs. Cincinnati WIN
17 Sun Dec.31 vs. San Francisco WIN

The Pitt game could go either way, but then so could the Cincinnati game, so I took the home team in both of those.

We'd be 11-5. Not bad for a touch schedule.

Rock Chalk · 11-01-2006, 11:57 AM

Winning out. 14-2.

Offense is rolling and defense will bounce back.

Cutler remains a non-factor in our Superbowl run to glory.

BroncoInferno · 11-01-2006, 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taco John

@ Arizona -- W <----The Cutler vs. Leinart Game! Warm up the TIVO!

ludo21 · 11-01-2006, 11:58 AM

i said 10 - 12 in the beginning, i dont see us getting more than that.

@ Pitt -- L
@ Oakland -- W
San Diego -- W
@ KC -- W
Seattle -- W
@ San Diego -- W
@ Arizona -- W
Cincy -- L
San Fran -- W

kmartin575 · 11-01-2006, 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alec

Winning out. 14-2.

Offense is rolling and defense will bounce back.

Cutler remains a non-factor in our Superbowl run to glory.

Wow, your offense is rolling after facing a crappy Indy defense who was missing both starting safeties and a defensive tackle? Sure thing buddy.

Mile High Shack · 11-01-2006, 12:03 PM

11-5, see, I'm not that negative, I just don't like our D coordinator

Rock Chalk · 11-01-2006, 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kmartin575

Wow, your offense is rolling after facing a crappy Indy defense who was missing both starting safeties and a defensive tackle? Sure thing buddy.

Yep.

Dont like it, dont read it. **********.

maven · 11-01-2006, 12:48 PM

@ Pitt -- L
@ Oakland -- W
San Diego -- W
@ KC -- L
Seattle -- L
@ San Diego -- L
@ Arizona -- W
Cincy -- L
San Fran -- W

I say 9-7

ClevelandBronco · 11-01-2006, 01:17 PM

@ Pitt -- L
@ Oakland -- W
San Diego -- W
@ KC -- L
Seattle -- W
@ San Diego -- L
@ Arizona -- W
Cincy -- L
San Fran -- W

10-6.

ClevelandBronco · 11-01-2006, 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taco John

@ Arizona -- W <----The Cutler vs. Leinart Game! Warm up the TIVO!

Oh. Cutler's in? Then I'd have to say:

@ Pitt -- L
@ Oakland -- L
San Diego -- L
@ KC -- L
Seattle -- L
@ San Diego -- L
@ Arizona -- W
Cincy -- L
San Fran -- W

7-9

55CrushEm · 11-01-2006, 01:25 PM

I can't believe how many of you have us losing to Cincy. To me, that's one of the locks for a Denver win.

Their run defense is barely better than Indy's.......we'll run them into the ground.

BroncoInferno · 11-01-2006, 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 55CrushEm

I can't believe how many of you have us losing to Cincy. To me, that's one of the locks for a Denver win.

That's what I'm thinking. Cincy hasn't looked terribly impressive this season, so I'm not sure why people think we'll lose that game. I mean, if it were on the road it'd be one thing, but in Denver I can't really see why so many chalk that up as an L.

Hogan11 · 11-01-2006, 01:55 PM

Sincy doesn't impress me....nor am I chalking the games @ SD and KC up as automatic losses either. Seattle and Pitt are both banged up enough to take them both...there's no real reason why we can't run it from here on out.

ClevelandBronco · 11-01-2006, 01:57 PM

Cincy is an "L" because Champ can't cover both Johnson and Houshyomama.

BroncoInferno · 11-01-2006, 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ClevelandBronco

Cincy is an "L" because Champ can't cover both Johnson and Houshyomama.

In other words, so many are picking Cincy as a knee jerk to one bad defensive outing after six superlative outings.. Cincy hasn't been impressive all season.

elsid13 · 11-01-2006, 02:00 PM

@ Pitt -- W Big Ben isn't Payton and the steelers offense aren't that good
@ Oakland -- W Shanahan rubs it in Al face again
San Diego -- W SD last won in Denver When

@ KC -- W - It my birthday, F' the chef it Elsid's present from Mike, Coyer Dinger
Seattle -- W = Shanahan know Ray Rhodes
@ San Diego -- L About time for let down game *Mane explodes with fire Coyer and bench Plummer thread.
@ Arizona -- W Season going no were for the Denny Green
Cincy -- W - Their Defense sucks. Pounding the ball the Broncos win easly
San Fran -- W = Cutler first Action of the Season, and Mike pulls the starters early

13-3

View Poll Results: How many wins will we have this regular season?
13 or more	2	4.17%
12	18	37.50%
11	20	41.67%
10	5	10.42%
9 or less	3	6.25%
Voters: 48. You may not vote on this poll

11-01-2006, 11:26 AM	#1
JCMElway Moderate-erator Dominate! Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Grand Rapids, MI Posts: 6,867 Adopt-a-Bronco: Oleg	Rest of the season forecast Are we optimistic or not? @ Pitt -- W @ Oakland -- W San Diego -- W @ KC -- L Seattle -- W @ San Diego -- L @ Arizona -- W Cincy -- W San Fran -- W I say 12- 4.

11-01-2006, 02:00 PM	#25
elsid13 Lost In Space Bóg, Honor, Ojczyzna Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: DC Posts: 19,099	@ Pitt -- W Big Ben isn't Payton and the steelers offense aren't that good @ Oakland -- W Shanahan rubs it in Al face again San Diego -- W SD last won in Denver When @ KC -- W - It my birthday, F' the chef it Elsid's present from Mike, Coyer Dinger Seattle -- W = Shanahan know Ray Rhodes @ San Diego -- L About time for let down game Mane explodes with fire Coyer and bench Plummer thread. @ Arizona -- W Season going no were for the Denny Green Cincy -- W - Their Defense sucks. Pounding the ball the Broncos win easly San Fran -- W = Cutler first Action of the Season, and Mike pulls the starters early 13-3 Last edited by elsid13; 11-01-2006 at 02:03 PM..*

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

11-01-2006, 11:30 AM	#2
Hotrod Self Appointed Expert aka Dortoh Join Date: Aug 2003 Posts: 25,136 Adopt-a-Bronco: Miss I	@ Pitt -- W @ Oakland -- W San Diego -- W @ KC -- L Seattle -- W @ San Diego -- L @ Arizona -- W Cincy -- W San Fran -- W I say 12- 4. ditto

11-01-2006, 11:32 AM	#3
55CrushEm Dynamic Duo Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: North of Boston, MA Posts: 5,592 Adopt-a-Bronco: Quanterus Smith	11-5.....we will also lose to Pitt this weekend......I'm a pessimist.

11-01-2006, 11:33 AM	#4
Orange_Beard Over Jay Cutler Todd Snider Rules! Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Leucadia, CA Posts: 7,836 Adopt-a-Bronco: Tony Scheffler	@ Pitt -- W @ Oakland -- W San Diego -- W @ KC -- L Seattle -- L @ San Diego -- L @ Arizona -- W Cincy -- L San Fran -- W Seattle will be healthy. Cincy will be a L if there is no pressure on Palmer.

11-01-2006, 11:33 AM	#5
defenseman Ring of Famer 2007 record pred. (7-9) Join Date: Apr 2001 Posts: 9,232	11-5...dman

11-01-2006, 11:37 AM	#6
WABronco WE SUCK AGAIN All dat force Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Denver Posts: 4,976	Those scenarios seem suprisingly realistic, to me anyways. I think this next game is dangerous. Oakland's playing well, but not well enough to worry about IMO. San Diego at home should be a fight. I am also resigned to losing at KC...but wouldn't it be sweet to win one so we could tell all those trolls to STFU once and for all? Anyways, Seattle's D has gone down the ****ter of late, but they could have Hass and Alexander back (but their ground game still sucks). San Diego away is going to be a battle again. Cincy doesn't scare me as much as they used to... 12-4 sounds good...

11-01-2006, 11:50 AM	#7
toad Pro Bowler Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 657 Adopt-a-Bronco: Brian Clark	11-5 or 12-4....

11-01-2006, 11:52 AM	#8
kmartin575 Perennial Pro-bowler Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 886	@ Pitt -- L @ Oakland -- W San Diego -- ? @ KC -- L Seattle -- ? @ San Diego -- L @ Arizona -- W Cincy -- ? San Fran -- W Those three question marks are games at Denver where I think at least one of the three will be a loss for Denver. All three are high powered offenses that could give Denver trouble. Plus, all three have a hell of alot better defenses than Indianapolis so points will not be as easy to come by.

11-01-2006, 11:53 AM	#9
Taco John 24/7 Broncos In Elway I Trust Join Date: Apr 2001 Posts: 49,708 Adopt-a-Bronco: Peyton Manning	Here's mine: @ Pitt -- L @ Oakland -- W San Diego -- W @ KC -- W Seattle -- W @ San Diego -- L @ Arizona -- W <----The Cutler vs. Leinart Game! Warm up the TIVO! Cincy -- L San Fran -- W 11-5

11-01-2006, 11:56 AM	#10
Kaylore 6-37, Raider fans. Yummy birds and snow! Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Ceti Alpha V Posts: 41,076 Adopt-a-Bronco: Wesley Duke	I'd say this: 9 Sun Nov. 5 at Pittsburgh LOSS 10 Sun Nov.12 at Oakland WIN 11 Sun Nov.19 vs. San Diego WIN 12 Thu Nov.23 at Kansas City LOSS 13 Sun Dec. 3 vs. Seattle WIN 14 Sun Dec.10 at San Diego LOSS 15 Sun Dec.17 at Arizona WIN 16 Sun Dec.24 vs. Cincinnati WIN 17 Sun Dec.31 vs. San Francisco WIN The Pitt game could go either way, but then so could the Cincinnati game, so I took the home team in both of those. We'd be 11-5. Not bad for a touch schedule.

11-01-2006, 11:57 AM	#11
Rock Chalk Cheeky Bastards Laus Deo Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: The Backside of the Internet Posts: 29,940 Adopt-a-Bronco: Chris Harris	Winning out. 14-2. Offense is rolling and defense will bounce back. Cutler remains a non-factor in our Superbowl run to glory.

11-01-2006, 11:58 AM	#13
ludo21 RIP Darrent Williams Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Glendale, AZ Posts: 17,915 Adopt-a-Bronco: Paul Ernster	i said 10 - 12 in the beginning, i dont see us getting more than that. @ Pitt -- L @ Oakland -- W San Diego -- W @ KC -- W Seattle -- W @ San Diego -- W @ Arizona -- W Cincy -- L San Fran -- W

11-01-2006, 12:03 PM	#15
Mile High Shack Ring of Famer Cock-a-doodle-do Join Date: May 2001 Location: Somewhere Posts: 17,010	11-5, see, I'm not that negative, I just don't like our D coordinator

11-01-2006, 12:48 PM	#17
maven ★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆ Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 7,757	@ Pitt -- L @ Oakland -- W San Diego -- W @ KC -- L Seattle -- L @ San Diego -- L @ Arizona -- W Cincy -- L San Fran -- W I say 9-7

11-01-2006, 01:17 PM	#18
ClevelandBronco Ring of Famer Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Freedonia Posts: 1,643	@ Pitt -- L @ Oakland -- W San Diego -- W @ KC -- L Seattle -- W @ San Diego -- L @ Arizona -- W Cincy -- L San Fran -- W 10-6.

11-01-2006, 01:25 PM	#20
55CrushEm Dynamic Duo Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: North of Boston, MA Posts: 5,592 Adopt-a-Bronco: Quanterus Smith	I can't believe how many of you have us losing to Cincy. To me, that's one of the locks for a Denver win. Their run defense is barely better than Indy's.......we'll run them into the ground.

11-01-2006, 01:55 PM	#22
Hogan11 Rock-N-Roll Historian Let's take these SOB's out!!!!!! Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: W.NY.B.C. Posts: 21,300 Adopt-a-Bronco: Floyd Little	Sincy doesn't impress me....nor am I chalking the games @ SD and KC up as automatic losses either. Seattle and Pitt are both banged up enough to take them both...there's no real reason why we can't run it from here on out.

11-01-2006, 01:57 PM	#23
ClevelandBronco Ring of Famer Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Freedonia Posts: 1,643	Cincy is an "L" because Champ can't cover both Johnson and Houshyomama.