Saudi ambassador to U.S. claims there is an excess supply of oil - The Orange Mane

L.A. BRONCOS FAN · 05-12-2006, 07:37 PM

World has 'enough' oil

By H. Darr Beiser, USA TODAY

Oil prices are skyrocketing. Iran appears determined to develop its nuclear program, if not weapons. The Iraq war blazes on with no end in sight. Israelis and Palestinians haven't had meaningful peace talks in years. In the middle of this chaos sits Saudi Arabia, the world's largest oil producer. Prince Turki al-Faisal, Saudi Arabia's ambassador to the United States, discussed these and other issues last week with USA TODAY editors and reporters.
His comments were edited for length and clarity.

Question: With oil prices reaching record highs, what is your sense of today's supply and demand?

Answer: There are enough supplies today to meet world demand. In fact, there is an excess supply. For the last two or three years, we've been trying to sell some of our oil on the market, without any customers. When OPEC (Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries) met a couple weeks ago, they said that not only were supplies available, but also all inventories in all countries are at their highest levels ever. These factors should be bringing down the price of oil. But the issue of security, and the political dimension — not just in our part of the world, but in places like Nigeria, and your differences with Venezuela — add $15 to $20 to the price of a barrel. The political dimension, really, has overtaken the economic and business dimensions.

Q: Where would Saudi Arabia like to see the price of oil?

A: Our minister of oil said two months ago that a fair price would be between $40 and $45 per barrel. (Today prices are roughly $70 a barrel). Whether that has changed, I don't know. But that range is an equitable price for producers and consumers.

Q: What would be the significance of Iran acquiring nuclear weapons, and how far should the U.N. and U.S. go in preventing that?

A: The Middle East should be free of weapons of mass destruction, no exceptions. I think the United Nations process is probably the most logical way that this issue can be treated.

Q: If diplomatic efforts were to fail, should force be used to prevent Iran from acquiring weapons?

A: We are against the use of force in any conflict. The effects would be detrimental not just to us but to the whole area. King Abdullah has publicly stated that war destroys, and what our region needs is to be built up.

Q: Many Americans see Saudi Arabia as a country that suppresses women's rights. What would you say to them?

A: I would say that Saudi Arabia started from a very low point in its attitude toward social issues. We came from a society that was more like 17th- or 18th-century practices than 20th- or 21st-century practices. But in the past 70 years, we've moved forward. More women graduate from universities than men. More women are joining the workforce. If you'd looked at Saudi Arabia 25 years ago, a household would be perhaps composed of a father, mother and six or seven kids. The father would have felt that it would be shameful to allow his wife or any female family member to seek a job. Today, the most prized woman is a woman with a job. It's that kind of evolutionary process that we're going through.

Q: So, does that then lead to women participating in elections, too?

A: Absolutely. The next elections are going to be in three years, for municipal elections. And women will participate fully in those elections, and not just as voters, but as candidates if they want.

Q: There seems to be warming ties between Saudi Arabia and China. How would you characterize this relationship?

A: It's a confluence of many interests. When we established relations with them, it was on a footing of one to one. They don't throw their weight around. They're very careful in what they engage in, and they've been supporters of the Arab position, for example, in terms of the peace process in the Middle East — Palestinian rights and so on. Of course, they also buy a lot of oil from us, but it is not just an issue of oil. There is a sense of empathy between the two countries.

Q: Is China a better friend to Saudi Arabia than the United States is?

A: Not necessarily a better friend, but a less complicated friend. I don't think, nor does anybody in Saudi Arabia think, that China is a counterweight to the United States. But your country is courting China because you obviously think that it is important to court China. We're simply following your lead.

Q: Looking realistically at the situation in Iraq, do you think civil war or partition can be avoided? Is there a way to bring a successful solution?

A: I think it can. This is the challenge that faces this government, and hence the need for them to think more as Iraqis and less as Shiites, Sunnis or Kurds. I don't think it's useful or important to say whether there is civil war or sectarian conflict or whatever you want to call it, but killing is taking place. The only way they can be stopped is by a strong central government that can impose its authority on the society and show that it is capable of meeting challenges.

Q: Sen. Joseph Biden, the ranking Democratic member of the Foreign Relations Committee, has called for partitioning Iraq. Your thoughts on this?

A: That's an awful idea because it creates more problems than it solves. Dealing with one Iraq is enough of a problem. Imagine dealing with three Iraqs. How do you partition? To divide Iraq into territorial entities would create a mess. And neighbors would try to interfere with that process. All the contiguous countries to Iraq, without exception, want a unified Iraq.

Q: More broadly, hasn't the terrorist problem gotten worse since the Iraq war began?

A: If you look at the literature coming out of the terrorist organizations, Iraq figures prominently among them. Look at (Osama) bin Laden's sermons, and Ayman al-Zawahiri's preachings, and (Abu Musab) al-Zarqawi's participation. All of these people constantly refer to Iraq as an issue to be taken up with. We've interrogated some of the Saudis who have come back from Iraq, and most of them were going, not to join al-Qaeda, but to fight the invader. And, generally what happens is they get sucked into the al-Qaeda operations. And then the brainwashing takes place.

Q: The Israeli-Palestinian peace process has been stalled, and the United States has said it will not deal with Hamas. Is this a wise course?

A: Both countries have shown that the people want a two-state solution. Since the recent elections, Palestinians urged the new government to talk with the Israelis, and the Israeli people urged the new government to talk with Hamas. So you've got an expression of public will to move the peace process forward. How do you translate that into political action? Obviously, Hamas on one side and (Israeli Prime Minister Ehud) Olmert and his coalition on the other have baggage and perhaps even political impediments to adhering to the will of their people. This is where the United States should come in and be the honest broker that it has always promised to be. Something has to be done.

Q: What's the best way for the United States to resolve the Hamas dilemma?

A: When Israel signed the Oslo agreements with the PLO (Palestine Liberation Organization) in 1993, in Israel's eyes, the PLO was then a terrorist organization. The PLO constitution and manifesto included the same phrases that exist in Hamas' manifesto and constitution about driving out the Zionist enemy and liberating all of Palestine, etc. It wasn't until 1997 that the PLO removed those phrases. Hence came the demand of the Israelis on their government to talk to Hamas.

Q: How was the outcry over the Dubai ports deal viewed in Saudi Arabia and in the rest of the Middle East?

A: Everybody looked upon it in the Middle East as another example of American unfairness. The issue of Palestine was always the ranking issue for Arabs in general as an issue of double standards, and when Dubai ports came along, it just seemed to confirm that. In my talks with American officials and non-official experts on your politics, I have been told that this is more an issue of grandstanding and demagoguery during your election season. But it left a bitter taste.

Q: Is there anything else the United States could be doing to promote its image in the Middle East?

A: We would like to see American students come to our universities. In as much as you have your own stereotypical images of Saudi Arabia, Saudis have stereotypical images of you. Personal contact can break down these stereotypes. I tell our students everywhere I go that they are the real ambassadors. We (in government) are bound by diplomacy and officialdom and sort of at arms length from engagement with American society. Students are the ones who are going to fully engage in that process. I tell them I hope that they represent Saudi Arabia in the best manner.

Spider · 05-12-2006, 07:54 PM

I told of how we have "Shut in Wells "in and around Sidney Montana .... Canadian oil is flooding the pipe line

L.A. BRONCOS FAN · 05-12-2006, 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by §Pide®

I told of how we have "Shut in Wells "in and around Sidney Montana .... Canadian oil is flooding the pipe line

This is the part of what he had to say that is the most telling, IMO:

Quote:

There are enough supplies today to meet world demand. In fact, there is an excess supply. For the last two or three years, we've been trying to sell some of our oil on the market, without any customers. When OPEC (Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries) met a couple weeks ago, they said that not only were supplies available, but also all inventories in all countries are at their highest levels ever. These factors should be bringing down the price of oil. But the issue of security, and the political dimension — not just in our part of the world, but in places like Nigeria, and your differences with Venezuela — add $15 to $20 to the price of a barrel. The political dimension, really, has overtaken the economic and business dimensions.

He's not just making a statement about OPEC's reserves (claims about which some skepticism is often warranted) - he's making a claim about excess supply that he can't find customers for!

L.A. BRONCOS FAN · 05-12-2006, 09:06 PM

Spider · 05-12-2006, 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A. BRONCOS FAN

This is the part of what he had to say that is the most telling, IMO:

He's not just making a statement about OPEC's reserves (claims about which some skepticism is often warranted) - he's making a claim about excess supply that he can't find customers for!

what I was trying to tell W*GS is there no shortage , but what happened was the merger of the big 4 , made it to where they ( the big 4) can control the refienment of crude , thus they were afforded the opertunity to shut down a few refieneries here and there for repairs , thus making refiement even more scarce , then along comes Katrina and it is party time , thats sure to disrupt flow , start a rumor or 2 about some snipers , no way in hell can we get into repairing the pipeline in time to lower the price ,well thats done , time to blame the liberals for not letting us build more refineries , keep the production @ 85% and keep prices up , tell everyone it is supply and Demand , China etc ...In a ay Big oil does tell the truth , what they leave out is they create the supply

W*GS · 05-13-2006, 07:28 PM

Spider, show me where I said there was a shortage of oil.

Spider · 05-13-2006, 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by W*GS

Spider, show me where I said there was a shortage of oil.

reread the post Ward ... the cut back in Refinement of the crude , we settled there was no shartage , you went Batshít pulling out some little chart when I said Refieneries were still winter production levels of 85% , then you went on to tell me People in the oil field dont know what in the hell they are talking about , Goverment charts had all the answers ......Remember yo udidnt see no Mergers of the big 4 and how it effected supply

05-12-2006, 07:37 PM	#1
L.A. BRONCOS FAN Mo' holla fo' yo' dolla! Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: In a bunker in an undisclosed location Posts: 52,694	Saudi ambassador to U.S. claims there is an excess supply of oil World has 'enough' oil By H. Darr Beiser, USA TODAY Oil prices are skyrocketing. Iran appears determined to develop its nuclear program, if not weapons. The Iraq war blazes on with no end in sight. Israelis and Palestinians haven't had meaningful peace talks in years. In the middle of this chaos sits Saudi Arabia, the world's largest oil producer. Prince Turki al-Faisal, Saudi Arabia's ambassador to the United States, discussed these and other issues last week with USA TODAY editors and reporters. His comments were edited for length and clarity. Question: With oil prices reaching record highs, what is your sense of today's supply and demand? Answer: There are enough supplies today to meet world demand. In fact, there is an excess supply. For the last two or three years, we've been trying to sell some of our oil on the market, without any customers. When OPEC (Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries) met a couple weeks ago, they said that not only were supplies available, but also all inventories in all countries are at their highest levels ever. These factors should be bringing down the price of oil. But the issue of security, and the political dimension — not just in our part of the world, but in places like Nigeria, and your differences with Venezuela — add $15 to $20 to the price of a barrel. The political dimension, really, has overtaken the economic and business dimensions. Q: Where would Saudi Arabia like to see the price of oil? A: Our minister of oil said two months ago that a fair price would be between $40 and $45 per barrel. (Today prices are roughly $70 a barrel). Whether that has changed, I don't know. But that range is an equitable price for producers and consumers. Q: What would be the significance of Iran acquiring nuclear weapons, and how far should the U.N. and U.S. go in preventing that? A: The Middle East should be free of weapons of mass destruction, no exceptions. I think the United Nations process is probably the most logical way that this issue can be treated. Q: If diplomatic efforts were to fail, should force be used to prevent Iran from acquiring weapons? A: We are against the use of force in any conflict. The effects would be detrimental not just to us but to the whole area. King Abdullah has publicly stated that war destroys, and what our region needs is to be built up. Q: Many Americans see Saudi Arabia as a country that suppresses women's rights. What would you say to them? A: I would say that Saudi Arabia started from a very low point in its attitude toward social issues. We came from a society that was more like 17th- or 18th-century practices than 20th- or 21st-century practices. But in the past 70 years, we've moved forward. More women graduate from universities than men. More women are joining the workforce. If you'd looked at Saudi Arabia 25 years ago, a household would be perhaps composed of a father, mother and six or seven kids. The father would have felt that it would be shameful to allow his wife or any female family member to seek a job. Today, the most prized woman is a woman with a job. It's that kind of evolutionary process that we're going through. Q: So, does that then lead to women participating in elections, too? A: Absolutely. The next elections are going to be in three years, for municipal elections. And women will participate fully in those elections, and not just as voters, but as candidates if they want. Q: There seems to be warming ties between Saudi Arabia and China. How would you characterize this relationship? A: It's a confluence of many interests. When we established relations with them, it was on a footing of one to one. They don't throw their weight around. They're very careful in what they engage in, and they've been supporters of the Arab position, for example, in terms of the peace process in the Middle East — Palestinian rights and so on. Of course, they also buy a lot of oil from us, but it is not just an issue of oil. There is a sense of empathy between the two countries. Q: Is China a better friend to Saudi Arabia than the United States is? A: Not necessarily a better friend, but a less complicated friend. I don't think, nor does anybody in Saudi Arabia think, that China is a counterweight to the United States. But your country is courting China because you obviously think that it is important to court China. We're simply following your lead. Q: Looking realistically at the situation in Iraq, do you think civil war or partition can be avoided? Is there a way to bring a successful solution? A: I think it can. This is the challenge that faces this government, and hence the need for them to think more as Iraqis and less as Shiites, Sunnis or Kurds. I don't think it's useful or important to say whether there is civil war or sectarian conflict or whatever you want to call it, but killing is taking place. The only way they can be stopped is by a strong central government that can impose its authority on the society and show that it is capable of meeting challenges. Q: Sen. Joseph Biden, the ranking Democratic member of the Foreign Relations Committee, has called for partitioning Iraq. Your thoughts on this? A: That's an awful idea because it creates more problems than it solves. Dealing with one Iraq is enough of a problem. Imagine dealing with three Iraqs. How do you partition? To divide Iraq into territorial entities would create a mess. And neighbors would try to interfere with that process. All the contiguous countries to Iraq, without exception, want a unified Iraq. Q: More broadly, hasn't the terrorist problem gotten worse since the Iraq war began? A: If you look at the literature coming out of the terrorist organizations, Iraq figures prominently among them. Look at (Osama) bin Laden's sermons, and Ayman al-Zawahiri's preachings, and (Abu Musab) al-Zarqawi's participation. All of these people constantly refer to Iraq as an issue to be taken up with. We've interrogated some of the Saudis who have come back from Iraq, and most of them were going, not to join al-Qaeda, but to fight the invader. And, generally what happens is they get sucked into the al-Qaeda operations. And then the brainwashing takes place. Q: The Israeli-Palestinian peace process has been stalled, and the United States has said it will not deal with Hamas. Is this a wise course? A: Both countries have shown that the people want a two-state solution. Since the recent elections, Palestinians urged the new government to talk with the Israelis, and the Israeli people urged the new government to talk with Hamas. So you've got an expression of public will to move the peace process forward. How do you translate that into political action? Obviously, Hamas on one side and (Israeli Prime Minister Ehud) Olmert and his coalition on the other have baggage and perhaps even political impediments to adhering to the will of their people. This is where the United States should come in and be the honest broker that it has always promised to be. Something has to be done. Q: What's the best way for the United States to resolve the Hamas dilemma? A: When Israel signed the Oslo agreements with the PLO (Palestine Liberation Organization) in 1993, in Israel's eyes, the PLO was then a terrorist organization. The PLO constitution and manifesto included the same phrases that exist in Hamas' manifesto and constitution about driving out the Zionist enemy and liberating all of Palestine, etc. It wasn't until 1997 that the PLO removed those phrases. Hence came the demand of the Israelis on their government to talk to Hamas. Q: How was the outcry over the Dubai ports deal viewed in Saudi Arabia and in the rest of the Middle East? A: Everybody looked upon it in the Middle East as another example of American unfairness. The issue of Palestine was always the ranking issue for Arabs in general as an issue of double standards, and when Dubai ports came along, it just seemed to confirm that. In my talks with American officials and non-official experts on your politics, I have been told that this is more an issue of grandstanding and demagoguery during your election season. But it left a bitter taste. Q: Is there anything else the United States could be doing to promote its image in the Middle East? A: We would like to see American students come to our universities. In as much as you have your own stereotypical images of Saudi Arabia, Saudis have stereotypical images of you. Personal contact can break down these stereotypes. I tell our students everywhere I go that they are the real ambassadors. We (in government) are bound by diplomacy and officialdom and sort of at arms length from engagement with American society. Students are the ones who are going to fully engage in that process. I tell them I hope that they represent Saudi Arabia in the best manner.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

05-12-2006, 07:54 PM	#2
Spider Mr Diplomacy I survived Tebow Mania at the Mane Join Date: May 2001 Location: Elway was just an arm =MacGruder Posts: 84,438 Adopt-a-Bronco: Von Miller	I told of how we have "Shut in Wells "in and around Sidney Montana .... Canadian oil is flooding the pipe line

05-12-2006, 09:06 PM	#4
L.A. BRONCOS FAN Mo' holla fo' yo' dolla! Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: In a bunker in an undisclosed location Posts: 52,694

05-13-2006, 07:28 PM	#6
W*GS Ring of Famer Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Earth Posts: 19,499	Spider, show me where I said there was a shortage of oil.