![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Just Drafted
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Posts: 41
|
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#2 |
|
3,631 - WAKE UP!!!!
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 4,651
Adopt-a-Bronco: MJK |
huh
![]() I don't get it at all. I think we want Pope. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
~~~
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Earth Division
Posts: 19,802
Adopt-a-Bronco: Gilgamesh |
Broncos | Two draft picks acquired from 49ers
Wed, 19 Apr 2006 09:39:07 -0700 The Denver Broncos have announced the team has acquired a second-round pick (No. 37 overall) and a third-round pick (No. 68) in the 2006 NFL Draft from the San Francisco 49ers. In exchange for the picks, Denver sends San Francisco one of their two first round picks, No. 22 overall. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
It's all over...
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Okinawa, Japan
Posts: 13,289
|
That sucks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Dallas biggest Bronco fan
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: They've done studies you know.... 60% of the time, it works every time
Posts: 1,812
|
Hmmmm, don't know what to think of that.
Maybe we don't want to pay the price for 2 first round draft choices (contracts) |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
~~~
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Earth Division
Posts: 19,802
Adopt-a-Bronco: Gilgamesh |
If true, that value is spot on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
3,631 - WAKE UP!!!!
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 4,651
Adopt-a-Bronco: MJK |
It's almost a wash on the point value chart, we get 20 pts of value, but I think it is a terrible move.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Some dude
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,848
Adopt-a-Bronco: Eddie Royal |
Difference of 15 spots for a 68th spot pick. Sounds reasonable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
WE SUCK AGAIN
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Denver
Posts: 4,976
|
You guys are just being greedy.
Having a first, two seconds, a third, and 3 fourths is going to be crazy sweet. You'll see... |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Ho-Slayer
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 1,438
Adopt-a-Bronco: Dave Logan |
Booooooooooooooooooooo!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: colorado springs, co
Posts: 22,695
|
booo
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
RPM Racer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 4,681
Adopt-a-Bronco: Kenny McKinley |
Booooo
I'd rather have stood ground at 15 and 22 but...... i'm not a talent evaluator so what do I know. Maybe the guys we were looking at started to show signs of crapola or possibly we were trying to move up and that didn't work out. Whatever - just make sure we don't trade the 15th unless it's up - somehow. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Broncos kick a$$!!!
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Nyc, NY
Posts: 917
|
that blows
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
~~~
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Earth Division
Posts: 19,802
Adopt-a-Bronco: Gilgamesh |
The Broncos would have had to reach for a player at #22 or #15 in my eyes, and moving down for an extra third and for players with similar value from that point on makes a lot of sense.
Top targets at #37 - Mathias Kiwanuka, Leonard Pope, Marcedes Lewis and Maurice Stovall. How can you boo this? The value between players at #22 and #37 isn't that far off, and the Broncos gained an early pick (almost a late-second) in the process. Instead of getting one talent at #22, they'll get two. This is a good deal, for both teams. Wasn't it Wabbit the other day who said the Broncos had great relations with the 49ers? Makes sense. Someone should give him a carrot. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
3,631 - WAKE UP!!!!
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 4,651
Adopt-a-Bronco: MJK |
It's gotta be Leonard Pope, or whatever RB falls there. There are DL that we could have taken with the 22, but I think this shows that we aren't enamored with them, and that we want to go offense with our 2nd pick, but not pay 1st round money for the talent availible at TE and RB. I guess this move makes sense, but I still don't like it. I wanted us to move up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Broncos kick a$$!!!
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Nyc, NY
Posts: 917
|
so then we stand at 15 then 2 snd rounders and 2 3rd rounders? is that correct?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
It's all over...
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Okinawa, Japan
Posts: 13,289
|
So what are our picks now?
(1) 15 (2) 37 (2) 61 (3) 68 (4) 119 (4) 126 (4) 130 (5) 161 (6) 198 |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,798
|
That is a good trade for this yr's deep draft. Not only that, but SF's picks in the second and third are much higher than Denver's (especially since we don't have a 3rd). SF's second is only marginally worse than a late 1st, and the difference in talent will not be large (if any). In fact some very good DLs should be available there (and a very decent RB should be available in the 3rd).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
WE SUCK AGAIN
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Denver
Posts: 4,976
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hermosa Beach
Posts: 1,910
|
So much for going into the top 5-6. This takes some of the excitement out of it, so let's hope they can make it work. I'd still rather have both first rounders, so I guess I must also say, boooooo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
WE SUCK AGAIN
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Denver
Posts: 4,976
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 3,046
|
Good. I can now pay attention to the draft in the third round!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
~~~
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Earth Division
Posts: 19,802
Adopt-a-Bronco: Gilgamesh |
Like I said, I'd rather trade down than trade up. That's a lot of ammo, who knows what we're going to do now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,132
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 6,096
Adopt-a-Bronco: VP John Elway |
I hate it unless it's to trade back up again.
I wouldn't mind a WR at #15, and a TE at #37 |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|