Niner/Bronco realistic trade scenerio - The Orange Mane

cutthemdown · 04-17-2006, 06:31 PM

We trade the 15th overall, our 22nd selection in 4th round and Ashlie Lelie to the niners for the 6th overall pick in the draft. For the value on this to work out niners would have to consider Lelie worth a mid 2nd round pick. I'm not predicting this it's just a scenerio. Does that seem like a fair trade for niners? or would they prob rather not have lelie and get our 2nd round pick instead.

Clockwork Orange · 04-17-2006, 06:35 PM

I think the 49ers would want more.

DrFate · 04-17-2006, 07:00 PM

I agree with Clockwork on this one.

ludo21 · 04-17-2006, 07:02 PM

15, 22 and Lelie is plenty imo.

If they want more, screw em'.

We have a huge thread on the niner trade tho..... but tis offseason, so we need a few more.

DrFate · 04-17-2006, 07:05 PM

I thought the '22nd' he meant was in round 4?

I think San Fran would take both our 1sts and Lelie. That trade would favor them.

SpringStein · 04-17-2006, 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ludo21

15, 22 and Lelie is plenty imo.

If they want more, screw em'.

We have a huge thread on the niner trade tho..... but tis offseason, so we need a few more.

The initial post was not #22 - it was 22nd pick of the 4th, #15 and Ashley for #6.

ludo21 · 04-17-2006, 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpringStein

The initial post was not #22 - it was 22nd pick of the 4th, #15 and Ashley for #6.

ahhhhh, i was going to say, thats more than fair!

TY SS.

Yeah, we better hope Lelie is high in their eyes, caz that would be a steal for us.

If we can move UP in the first, AND keep 1 of our firsts, ill be thrilled!

jossjeff · 04-17-2006, 07:14 PM

If I was San Fran I would do that deal.

#15 and #22 for and Lelie for #6.

JMO.

Hope it doesn't happen cause I don't want you ****ers getting V Davis.

But just 'sayin.

If I was San Fran I'd do that deal.

Tombstone RJ · 04-17-2006, 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jossjeff

If I was San Fran I would do that deal.

#15 and #22 for and Lelie for #6.

JMO.

Hope it doesn't happen cause I don't want you ****ers getting V Davis.

But just 'sayin.

If I was San Fran I'd do that deal.

That's three first rounders for the #6 pick. I dunno, that's a bit steep. Its true that Lelie is not, at this point, a #1 WR. But he has been productive, and he does have the ability to do alot great things on the field.

Killericon · 04-17-2006, 07:34 PM

Maybe #15, Our 2nd rounder and Lelie........I can't see anything less than that.

eddie mac · 04-17-2006, 07:38 PM

No f***ing way. The 1st scenario is acceptable, but if they give up 2 1st day picks and Ash for VD, they're dilusional.

Barry Ramey · 04-17-2006, 09:04 PM

Why not the Broncos deal the 15 and 22, plus Lelie and a 4th rounder to the Packers for Walker and the 5th pick? Broncos get Walker and TE Davis in this deal and Packers get a WR and extra picks to try to fix that defense.

yerner · 04-17-2006, 09:18 PM

Why are we trading a 3 players for a tight end? I wouldnt trade for sharp in his prime for that. its a tight end. ill take ash and two first rounders. seriously why the all the want for trades?

Ballhawk · 04-17-2006, 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry Ramey

Why not the Broncos deal the 15 and 22, plus Lelie and a 4th rounder to the Packers for Walker and the 5th pick? Broncos get Walker and TE Davis in this deal and Packers get a WR and extra picks to try to fix that defense.

Because alone the #15 & #22 are good enough to get #4 pick. Given that this draft is deep and that we are the only team with two 1st round picks besides the Jets, we should have a little more leverage than in most years. I think more teams will be looking to move down than up in this draft.

Also the teams we are talking to GB and SF both have young QBs they are trying to groom (even if Farve does come back), I think a proven commodity like Lelie is more desirable than a rookie making your QB look bad.

Walker, also is forcing GB to trade and is coming off a major knee injury so his value drops. Trying not to be bias Lelie rates a mid 2nd and Walker a 3rd.

Requiem · 04-17-2006, 09:22 PM

#15 and #22 is enough, it doesn't have to include Lelie.

If you want to keep two draft picks and dish Lelie -- send #15, Lelie and a conditional pick, (let's just say a 2007 3rd.) and that'd probably do it.

yavoon · 04-17-2006, 09:24 PM

lelie's trade value is prety contingent on what he is willing to sign for. no one is going to borrow lelie for a year for him to leave elsewhere.

if he gives in and reups with his new team for cheap all is good, if they meet and he has healthy demands(near market value) then his trade value plummets.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

04-17-2006, 06:31 PM	#1
cutthemdown A verbis ad verbera Zimm to HOF Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Long Beach Posts: 32,418	Niner/Bronco realistic trade scenerio We trade the 15th overall, our 22nd selection in 4th round and Ashlie Lelie to the niners for the 6th overall pick in the draft. For the value on this to work out niners would have to consider Lelie worth a mid 2nd round pick. I'm not predicting this it's just a scenerio. Does that seem like a fair trade for niners? or would they prob rather not have lelie and get our 2nd round pick instead.

04-17-2006, 06:35 PM	#2
Clockwork Orange Persona Non Grata I seen him! Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 21,438	I think the 49ers would want more.

04-17-2006, 07:00 PM	#3
DrFate Lord of Order Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Tower of Fate Posts: 4,388	I agree with Clockwork on this one.

04-17-2006, 07:02 PM	#4
ludo21 RIP Darrent Williams Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Glendale, AZ Posts: 17,898 Adopt-a-Bronco: Paul Ernster	15, 22 and Lelie is plenty imo. If they want more, screw em'. We have a huge thread on the niner trade tho..... but tis offseason, so we need a few more.

04-17-2006, 07:05 PM	#5
DrFate Lord of Order Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Tower of Fate Posts: 4,388	I thought the '22nd' he meant was in round 4? I think San Fran would take both our 1sts and Lelie. That trade would favor them.

04-17-2006, 07:14 PM	#8
jossjeff Pro Bowler Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: RaiderNation Posts: 721	If I was San Fran I would do that deal. #15 and #22 for and Lelie for #6. JMO. Hope it doesn't happen cause I don't want you ****ers getting V Davis. But just 'sayin. If I was San Fran I'd do that deal.

04-17-2006, 07:34 PM	#10
Killericon YES A DT!!!!!! Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: From Calgary, in Halifax for School Posts: 7,730 Adopt-a-Bronco: watermock	Maybe #15, Our 2nd rounder and Lelie........I can't see anything less than that.

04-17-2006, 07:38 PM	#11
eddie mac Ireland's No1 Bronco Eddie Mac 87 gone but never forgott Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: IRELAND Posts: 15,572 Adopt-a-Bronco: Rod Smith	No f***ing way. The 1st scenario is acceptable, but if they give up 2 1st day picks and Ash for VD, they're dilusional.

04-17-2006, 09:04 PM	#12
Barry Ramey Ring of Famer Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 1,700	Why not the Broncos deal the 15 and 22, plus Lelie and a 4th rounder to the Packers for Walker and the 5th pick? Broncos get Walker and TE Davis in this deal and Packers get a WR and extra picks to try to fix that defense.

04-17-2006, 09:18 PM	#13
yerner Ring of Famer Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Charlottesville VA Posts: 3,303	Why are we trading a 3 players for a tight end? I wouldnt trade for sharp in his prime for that. its a tight end. ill take ash and two first rounders. seriously why the all the want for trades?

04-17-2006, 09:22 PM	#15
Requiem ~~~ ~ ~ ~ Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Earth Division Posts: 19,515 Adopt-a-Bronco: Gilgamesh	#15 and #22 is enough, it doesn't have to include Lelie. If you want to keep two draft picks and dish Lelie -- send #15, Lelie and a conditional pick, (let's just say a 2007 3rd.) and that'd probably do it.

04-17-2006, 09:24 PM	#16
yavoon Ring of Famer Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 10,260	lelie's trade value is prety contingent on what he is willing to sign for. no one is going to borrow lelie for a year for him to leave elsewhere. if he gives in and reups with his new team for cheap all is good, if they meet and he has healthy demands(near market value) then his trade value plummets.