Iran: Israel Will Soon be Annihilated

[epicSocialism4tw]

Oh great. Here we go....


Iran Leader: Israel Will Be Annihilated
Apr 14 12:34 PM US/Eastern
Email this story

By ALI AKBAR DAREINI
Associated Press Writer


TEHRAN, Iran


The president of Iran again lashed out at Israel on Friday and said it was "heading toward annihilation," just days after Tehran raised fears about its nuclear activities by saying it successfully enriched uranium for the first time.

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad called Israel a "permanent threat" to the Middle East that will "soon" be liberated. He also appeared to again question whether the Holocaust really happened.

"Like it or not, the Zionist regime is heading toward annihilation," Ahmadinejad said at the opening of a conference in support of the Palestinians. "The Zionist regime is a rotten, dried tree that will be eliminated by one storm."

Ahmadinejad provoked a world outcry in October when he said Israel should be "wiped off the map."

On Friday, he repeated his previous line on the Holocaust, saying: "If such a disaster is true, why should the people of this region pay the price? Why does the Palestinian nation have to be suppressed and have its land occupied?"

The land of Palestine, he said, referring to the British mandated territory that includes all of Israel, Gaza and the West Bank, "will be freed soon."

He did not say how this would be achieved, but insisted to the audience of at least 900 people: "Believe that Palestine will be freed soon."

"The existence of this (Israeli) regime is a permanent threat" to the Middle East, he added. "Its existence has harmed the dignity of Islamic nations."

The three-day conference on Palestine is being attended by officials of Hamas, the ruling party in the Palestinian territories.

Iran has previously said it will give money to the Palestinian Authority to make up for the withdrawal of donations by Western nations who object to Hamas' refusal to recognize Israel and renounce violence. But no figure has been published.

On Tuesday, Ahmadinejad announced that Iran had successfully enriched uranium using a battery of 164 centrifuges, a significant step toward the large-scale production of enriched uranium required for either fueling nuclear reactors or making nuclear weapons.

The United States, France and Israel accuse Iran of using a civilian nuclear program to secretly build a weapon. Iran denies this, saying its program is confined to generating electricity.

The U.N. Security Council has given Iran until April 28 to cease enrichment. But Iran has rejected the demand.

The chief of Israeli military intelligence, Maj. Gen. Amos Yadlin, was quoted Wednesday as saying Iran could develop a nuclear bomb "within three years, by the end of the decade."

[WABronco]

****!

What the hell is the matter with these psychos??

[baja]

Interesting this all has been prophesied a very long time ago.

[Bronx33]

Originally Posted by baja fan

Interesting this all has been prophesied a very long time ago.

I wonder how the story really ends.

[Vegas_Bronco]

And there are those who think our 'occupation' of IRAQ 'has no more meaningful purpose' - gee frickin wiz!!!

The UN has been asking for years for them to stop without a glimpse of cooperation and isn't it feared that China and Russia are supporting the development of the weapons in IRAQ?

We better win a super bowl fast!!!

[ludo21]

Things are getting heated over there, i just hope cooler heads prevail, but war is imminent, it has been boiling for FAR too long.

[RMT]

Originally Posted by baja fan

Interesting this all has been prophesied a very long time ago.

You are correct, Baja ... the illegal immigrant issue can also be playing a part in the move to a "one world government" - again, prophesied a long time ago. We could eventually be known as "North America" instead of the United States ... who knows, but it sure appears we're headed in that direction.

[24champ]

Yup its a tinderbox over there in the Middle East. One match is all its going to take.

[WABronco]

Originally Posted by 24champbailey

Yup its a tinderbox over there in the Middle East. One match is all its going to take.

Let's just drop a huge concrete dome over the entire region. Whoever survives is wiped out when the dome collapses.

All better...

[Popps]

These ragheads better be careful. Depending who you ask, Israel has somewhere between a moderate and a heavy nuclear arsenal. Estimates range between 100-200 warheads.

These crazy towel wrappers are going to bark up the wrong tree with this ****. Israel is one country you do NOT want to test. Just look at their history... there's no question what they'd do if push came to shove.

[cutthemdown]

Originally Posted by baja fan

Interesting this all has been prophesied a very long time ago.

Weve heard that before

[epicSocialism4tw]

Originally Posted by Popps

These ragheads better be careful. Depending who you ask, Israel has somewhere between a moderate and a heavy nuclear arsenal. Estimates range between 100-200 warheads.
These crazy towel wrappers are going to bark up the wrong tree with this ****. Israel is one country you do NOT want to test. Just look at their history... there's no question what they'd do if push came to shove.

Israel doesnt put up with threats like we do. They'll get intel and strike first without quarter.

[Bronx33]

Originally Posted by Popps

These ragheads better be careful. Depending who you ask, Israel has somewhere between a moderate and a heavy nuclear arsenal. Estimates range between 100-200 warheads.

These crazy towel wrappers are going to bark up the wrong tree with this ****. Israel is one country you do NOT want to test. Just look at their history... there's no question what they'd do if push came to shove.

Israel has been getting ready for this for a long time, iran jst might be a papertiger and will find out the hard way if they do push the button. The palastinians could give a ratz a** too and they will get wacked too maybe jordon, egypt ect. (ACCURACY IS A WHOLE NEW DEPT)

[watermock]

cowabunga mother****er, time to take someone out.

[baja]

Originally Posted by watermock

cowabunga mother****er, time to take someone out.

Be carefull what you wish for if it happens eventually you will feel it even in Iowa.

[Cito Pelon]

Interesting stuff. Lot of posturing, posing, and bluffing. The Iranians absolutely do not want International oversight. They can become an impoverished country in five years just like Iraq became after UN sanctions were enacted, and enforced.

We'll see. I sense there may be some better cooperation between the Big Powers in regards to rogue nations. At some point, competition for "spheres of influence" reaches a point where the return for the investment doesn't pay off real well. At some point, the Big Powers are going to have to cooperate better to put a screeching halt to nuclear wanna-be's. And at that point, a new game begins . . . . It never ends, get used to it. Competition for supremacy never ends.

[Bronx33]

Originally Posted by Cito Pelon

Interesting stuff. Lot of posturing, posing, and bluffing. The Iranians absolutely do not want International oversight. They can become an impoverished country in five years just like Iraq became after UN sanctions were enacted, and enforced.

We'll see. I sense there may be some better cooperation between the Big Powers in regards to rogue nations. At some point, competition for "spheres of influence" reaches a point where the return for the investment doesn't pay off real well. At some point, the Big Powers are going to have to cooperate better to put a screeching halt to nuclear wanna-be's. And at that point, a new game begins . . . . It never ends, get used to it. Competition for supremacy never ends.

Gee i wonder why, the poor will be glad they have some light and a nuke they don't want (i have been talking to an iranian chick) for a couple weeks now and have read some interesting stuff in reguards to what they think of the current regime.

[baja]

Originally Posted by Bronx33

Gee i wonder why, the poor will be glad they have some light and a nuke they don't want (i have been talking to an iranian chick) for a couple weeks now and have read some interesting stuff in reguards to what they think of the current regime.

And that is?

[Bronx33]

Originally Posted by baja fan

And that is?

http://abovethewall2.blogspot.com/20....html#comments

Neda is her name she doesn't post a whole lot which is understandable.

[Cito Pelon]

Originally Posted by Bronx33

Gee i wonder why, the poor will be glad they have some light and a nuke they don't want (i have been talking to an iranian chick) for a couple weeks now and have read some interesting stuff in reguards to what they think of the current regime.

The Persians, just like all the rest of us humans, have an elite that has a lot of power in proportion to their numbers. That's why I'm all for spreading democracy.

This planet has never had more than 8-10 stable democracies at any one time, so I'd say that's a good path to pursue - something different than what we have had. Hell, there's only 8-10 stable democracies on this earth right now. This planet needs some stabilization really badly right now, and I think democratization that's the path to go. Hold free elections, or you power-hungry elites will get your ass kicked by the Democracies. Naturally, the Chinese and Russians have to help us out. Best of luck to you younger folks, you have a tough row to hoe.

Us older folks have been battling the Chinese and Russians for what, 300 years? And still haven't come to an accomodation with them. We're still pretty much at a stalemate, so best of luck to the next generation.

[Bronx33]

Originally Posted by Cito Pelon

The Persians, just like all the rest of us humans, have an elite that has a lot of power in proportion to their numbers. That's why I'm all for spreading democracy.

This planet has never had more than 8-10 stable democracies at any one time, so I'd say that's a good path to pursue - something different than what we have had. Hell, there's only 8-10 stable democracies on this earth right now. This planet needs some stabilization really badly right now, and I think democratization that's the path to go. Hold free elections, or you power-hungry elites will get your ass kicked by the Democracies. Naturally, the Chinese and Russians have to help us out. Best of luck to you younger folks, you have a tough row to hoe.

Us older folks have been battling the Chinese and Russians for what, 300 years? And still haven't come to an accomodation with them. We're still pretty much at a stalemate, so best of luck to the next generation.

Refusal to change and better lives is the problem and unfortunately for some these folks are in charge.

[Cito Pelon]

Originally Posted by Bronx33

Refusal to change and better lives is the problem and unfortunately for some these folks are in charge.

Human nature hates change. Change=instability. However, there is no stopping progress. Human society will progress. Always has. It's just a matter of how well it is managed, how bloody and brutal the process is allowed to become.

I'm a big believer in the Hegelian Dialectic. I can chart the Dialectic through human history. There's always been a Thesis, an Antithesis, Conflict; then the Synthesis. The Synthesis becomes the new Thesis, a new Antithesis always arises, then Conflict again, then another Synthesis, and so on and so on . . . . . .the record is there for all to see. It gets progressively more complicated, and therefore can become more bloody and brutal, but the basic theory is sound and predictable. Naturally, there are innumerable factors at every stage, including the ultimate outcome of the game, and that's where the fun is. It's just a game, and it's a lot of fun - if you win.

[baja]

Originally Posted by Cito Pelon

Human nature hates change. Change=instability. However, there is no stopping progress. Human society will progress. Always has. It's just a matter of how well it is managed, how bloody and brutal the process is allowed to become.

I'm a big believer in the Hegelian Dialectic. I can chart the Dialectic through human history. There's always been a Thesis, an Antithesis, Conflict; then the Synthesis. The Synthesis becomes the new Thesis, a new Antithesis always arises, then Conflict again, then another Synthesis, and so on and so on . . . . . .the record is there for all to see. It gets progressively more complicated, and therefore can become more bloody and brutal, but the basic theory is sound and predictable. Naturally, there are innumerable factors at every stage, including the ultimate outcome of the game, and that's where the fun is. It's just a game, and it's a lot of fun - if you win.

OK tell me how the story ends...

[Cito Pelon]

Originally Posted by Cito Pelon

. . . . . . and that's where the fun is. It's just a game, and it's a lot of fun - if you win.

I have to amend that - even if you do not win, the opportunity to play at the Big Table in geopolitics is fun in itself. There is no bigger game, and in all fairness, you have to welcome competition.

[Cito Pelon]

Originally Posted by baja fan

OK tell me how the story ends...

I said the theory is sound and predictable. The outcome is not. I have some ideas that you well know, but nothing is written in stone. Too many wildcards, too many opportunities for mis-management.